Rated Care Homes

Woodland Manor Care Home

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 6 ratings

    Its last inspection improved it from Inadequate to Good.

  • 6 years

    since the latest rating was published. A rating this old may not show how the service is today.

  • 78 of 113

    rated care homes in Buckinghamshire are rated Good, like this one.

Woodland Manor Care Home: inspection record

Care home with nursing, 64 beds, Buckinghamshire

Rated Good in October 2020, up from Inadequate.

Woodland Manor Care Home: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Greene House Good, 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Micholl's House Good, 0.1 miles away
  3. G
    Morton House Good, 0.1 miles away
  4. G
    Queen Elizabeth House Good, 0.1 miles away
  5. RI
    Russell House Requires improvement, 0.1 miles away

See all care homes in Buckinghamshire

See all care homes in Horn Hill

About the service

From the Care Quality Commission's inspection report published 24 October 2020. Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Woodland Manor Care Home is a care home providing personal and nursing care to 41 people aged 65 and over at the time of the inspection. The service can support up to 64 people.

Read the rest of CQC's summary

Woodland Manor Care Home accommodates 64 people across four separate units. Two units provide residential care and two units provide nursing care. The service supports people living with dementia. The home is purpose built, with all bedrooms having an en-suite shower, shared communal dining and sitting room facilities. It has a separate dining room for special occasions, a cafe bistro at the entrance to the home, a cinema and activity room which is accessible to people.

What inspectors found

People and the majority of relatives we spoke with for feedback were happy with the care provided. Some people would prefer to be at home but overall felt they got the care and support they required. Relatives were generally happy with the care and some relatives gave us examples of where their family members health had improved. All of the relatives, whilst finding the restrictions on visits incredibly tough, acknowledged that the service had done a great job in managing and responding to the COVID -19 pandemic and preventing an outbreak.

Read the rest of CQC's summary

Systems were in place to keep people safe. Risks to them were identified and managed. Safe medicine practices were promoted, and measures were in place to prevent cross infection. Accidents and incidents were monitored, and systems were in place to promote learning from accidents/incidents and prevent reoccurrence. Staff were suitably recruited, deployed and the required staffing levels were maintained. The shifts were managed, and tasks were allocated which resulted in people getting the required care in a timely manner.

People were supported by staff who were suitably inducted, trained and supported. The training and induction was tailored to different roles and regular monitoring of staff practice took place to ensure the training was embedded into practice. The management team had a presence on the units and assisted on shifts which further supported staff. People's health and nutritional needs were identified and met, and they had access to health professionals to further promote their well-being. People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; Whilst systems and policies were in place to support this the registered manager had identified that further training was needed.

We did not review the caring domain at this inspection. However, we observed staff were kind, caring, gentle and responsive to people's needs. People and relatives were complimentary of individual staff and gave examples where they felt they had gone the extra mile in relation to supporting them and their family member.

Person centred care was promoted and continued to be developed. People's care, support and communication needs were identified and met. People had access to one to one and group activities and the activity team had supported people and their relatives to keep in touch during the pandemic. People's end of life wishes, and preferences were identified, where the person and their family members had participated in that discussion. The service was supporting people on end of life care and staff had been trained and supported in that role. Systems were in place to deal with concerns and complaints. Some relatives raised concerns with us about their experiences of care. We have directed them to the provider to explore further.

People were supported by a service that was well managed and monitored. The registered manager had worked incredibly hard to improve the service and bring about positive changes and processes. They had built a strong management team to support them. As a result, communication, team work and staff morale had improved which resulted in positive outcomes for people. Regular auditing and reviewing of practices and processes took place which enabled the registered manager to have oversight of what areas needed further improvement.

People and the majority of relatives were positive about the improvements the registered manager had brought to the service. They described the registered manager as "accessible", "approachable", "honest", "listens and provides clarity'. A relative commented "I think the home is extremely well managed. I have found [registered managers name] firm but caring. She explains herself clearly, she is very hardworking, dedicated to her job and goes that extra mile. I am happy to trust my mother's care to a home managed by her".

Staff described the registered manager as "firm", "fair", "friendly", "knowledgeable", "experienced and professional'. A staff member told us they, "Felt happier, better supported, appreciated, valued and clear of what was expected from them." Another staff member commented, "It is more friendly here now. Staff work well as a team. Morale is good and staff feel like they can progress. Everyone gets the opportunity."

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. The last rating is 6 years old. Ask what has changed since then.
  2. Ask how nursing cover works at night and at weekends.
  3. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.

Registration details

Registered manager
Cristian Grozav
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service with nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

6 inspection reports, latest 24 October 2020. The reports are on the Care Quality Commission website.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
Porthaven Care Homes No 2 LimitedBrand: Porthaven Care Homes
Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
08167625 (opens Companies House)

Porthaven Care Homes No 2 Limited runs 8 services in England, 5 of them in the South East. 8 are rated Good or Outstanding.

Other services run by Porthaven Care Homes No 2 Limited

  1. G
    Bourne Wood Manor Care Home Good. Care home with nursing, Surrey
  2. G
    Lavender Oaks Care Home Good. Care home with nursing, Sutton, London
  3. G
    Lincroft Meadow Care Home Good. Care home with nursing, Oxfordshire
  4. G
    Penhurst Gardens Care Home Good. Care home with nursing, Oxfordshire

See all 8 services run by Porthaven Care Homes No 2 Limited

Getting help from Buckinghamshire Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Woodland Manor Care Home provide nursing care?
Yes. The Care Quality Commission lists Woodland Manor Care Home as a care home with nursing.
How many beds does Woodland Manor Care Home have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 64 beds at Woodland Manor Care Home.
When was Woodland Manor Care Home last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Woodland Manor Care Home was published on 24 October 2020.
Who runs Woodland Manor Care Home?
Woodland Manor Care Home is run by Porthaven Care Homes No 2 Limited. It runs 8 services in England, 5 of them in the South East.
What is Woodland Manor Care Home's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 24 October 2020.

Contact

Phone
01494 917600
Address
Micholls Avenue, Chalfont St Peter, Gerrards Cross, SL9 0EB Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Greene House Good, 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Micholl's House Good, 0.1 miles away
  3. G
    Morton House Good, 0.1 miles away
  4. G
    Queen Elizabeth House Good, 0.1 miles away
  5. RI
    Russell House Requires improvement, 0.1 miles away

See all care homes in Buckinghamshire

See all care homes in Horn Hill