Rated Care Homes

Belle Vue Country House

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 5 ratings

    Rated Good at every inspection since 2015.

  • 3 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 250 of 309

    rated care homes in West Sussex are rated Good, like this one.

Belle Vue Country House: inspection record

Care home with nursing, 41 beds, West Sussex

Rated Good in July 2026.

Belle Vue Country House: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Aniska Lodge Good, 1.6 miles away
  2. RI
    Homelands Nursing Home Requires improvement, 2.5 miles away
  3. G
  4. G
    Ullswater Cottage Good, 3.6 miles away
  5. RI
    Pelham House Residential Care Home with Dementia Requires improvement, 4 miles away

See all care homes in West Sussex

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 28 July 2026 (assessment visit 26 May 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Dates of Assessment: 2 July to 9 July 2026. Belle Vue Country House is a care home, providing accommodation, nursing and personal care to people living with varying stages of dementia and mental health conditions. The service can accommodate up to 41 people, at the time of our assessment 29 people were living at the service.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

At this assessment, we found sustained improvements across the service. The registered manager had achieved their registration with CQC since our last assessment and had worked with their team to address previous shortfalls. The provider was previously in breach of legal regulations in relation to the overall governance of the service, consent and how the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA) was applied. Improvements were found at this assessment, and the provider was no longer in breach of these regulations.

MCA assessments were now completed for people who lacked mental capacity and best interest decisions were made and documented in line with legislation. Staff offered choices to people and requested consent before supporting them but respected their wishes if they declined.

Leadership and governance arrangements had improved since the last assessment. The registered manager and management team had created an open and inclusive culture, with clear oversight of quality and safety. Auditing systems were more effective, and learning from incidents and feedback was used to drive continuous improvement.

Staff understood their responsibilities to protect people at risk of abuse and now had access to up to date policies should they need to escalate any concerns. Staff demonstrated an understanding of safeguarding processes and appropriate action was taken when concerns were identified. Medicines were now well organised and stored safely. Staff continued to administer medicines in a person-centred way.

Staff treated people with dignity and respect and adapted their approach based on individual needs and preferences. Improvements had been made to people’s experiences, including more personalised bedrooms and enhanced activities that reflected people’s interests.

People’s needs were assessed before admission and regularly reviewed. Staff worked effectively with external professionals to achieve positive outcomes for people, including improvements in wound care, nutrition and overall wellbeing. People were supported to live healthier lives and maintain independence wherever possible.

The general environment had improved; works had been completed to upgrade bathrooms, toilets and people’s bedrooms which meant infection prevention and control processes could now be effectively practiced. Systems to ensure equipment was serviced within timeframes were in place and upgrades to the fire system had been completed. Works had been carried out to provide a more suitable environment for people living with dementia, including signage to support their independence when walking around the service.

Feedback was now regularly sought from people and their relatives; meetings were held to discuss changes within the service and seek ideas. Staff told us they felt valued, well supported and able to contribute to changes within the service.

The registered manager had built up a support network to keep themselves up to date with best practice guidance. They told us of plans they had to continually improve the service to promote good outcomes for people including expanding on activities and outings.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

    At our last assessment we identified concerns regarding consent and how the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA) was applied. During this assessment, we found improvements had been made. MCA assessments were completed where people lacked capacity and best interest decisions were documented appropriately. Staff sought consent before providing care and people were supported to make their own decisions wherever possible. These improvements demonstrated the provider had addressed the concerns previously identified under Regulation 11.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

    At our last assessment we identified concerns regarding governance and oversight. During this assessment, we found improvements had been made. Auditing and monitoring systems were more effective, leaders had greater oversight of quality and safety, and learning was used to drive improvement. These changes demonstrated the provider had addressed the concerns previously identified under Regulation 17.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask how nursing cover works at night and at weekends.
  2. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  3. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Elsan Alias
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service with nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Mental Health, Older People, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

6 inspection reports, latest 19 May 2022. Latest assessment published 28 July 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
02293796 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from West Sussex County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Belle Vue Country House provide nursing care?
Yes. The Care Quality Commission lists Belle Vue Country House as a care home with nursing.
How many beds does Belle Vue Country House have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 41 beds at Belle Vue Country House.
When was Belle Vue Country House last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Belle Vue Country House was published on 28 July 2026.
Who runs Belle Vue Country House?
Belle Vue Country House is run by Newcare Homes Limited.
What is Belle Vue Country House's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 28 July 2026.

Contact

Phone
01444 461207
Address
Warninglid Lane, Warninglid, RH17 5TQ Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Aniska Lodge Good, 1.6 miles away
  2. RI
    Homelands Nursing Home Requires improvement, 2.5 miles away
  3. G
  4. G
    Ullswater Cottage Good, 3.6 miles away
  5. RI
    Pelham House Residential Care Home with Dementia Requires improvement, 4 miles away

See all care homes in West Sussex