Whitehaven Residential Home
- Care home
- 15 beds
- No nursing
- Dementia care
- Registered since 2011
- Blendworth, Hampshire, South East
Requires improvement
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
At a glance
3 ratings
Its last inspection moved it down from Good to Requires improvement.
6 months
since the latest rating was published.
59 of 420
rated care homes in Hampshire are rated Requires improvement, like this one.
Whitehaven Residential Home: inspection record
Rated Requires improvement in April 2026, down from Good.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Compare nearby
Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Pear Tree Court (Good, 0.4 miles away) and Wisteria Lodge (Outstanding, 0.7 miles away).
Nearest care homes:
- – Bere Grove Care Home Not yet rated, 0.3 miles away
- – Acacia House Nursing Home Not yet rated, 0.4 miles away
- G Pear Tree Court Good, 0.4 miles away
- O Wisteria Lodge Outstanding, 0.7 miles away
- G Durlands Road Good, 0.8 miles away
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 13 April 2026 (assessment visit 10 February 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
Date of Assessment: 2 to 16 March 2025. This was a responsive inspection of the following key questions, safe, effective, responsive and well led. It was completed to follow up on the enforcement action taken after our previous inspection. This service is a residential care home for up to 15 people, providing support for older people who may be living with dementia.
- Safe No rating
- Effective No rating
- Responsive Good
- Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary
The provider was previously in breach of legal regulations in relation to consent, safe care and treatment, safeguarding, safety of the premises and governance. Whilst we found improvements had been made, further work was required, and the provider remained in breach of these regulations.
The provider did not always control potential risks in the care environment, for example, the required works in relation to fire safety were still in the process of being completed.
The provider did not have clear responsibilities, systems of accountability and good governance systems. They did not always ensure records were robust and fully evidenced the care people received.
The provider could not demonstrate they always had a positive culture of safety, due to a lack of records. The provider did not demonstrate how they always managed risk to people well. The provider did not always make sure that medicines and treatments were safe and met people’s needs, capacities and preferences.
The provider had not obtained written evidence of people’s consent to their care or recorded how they ensured legal requirements were met where people lacked the capacity to consent. Therefore, they could not always evidence the assessments they completed when people had restrictions in place.
The provider was previously in breach of legal regulation in relation to notifications. Improvements were found at this assessment, and the provider was no longer in breach of this regulation.
Through our observations, speaking with relatives, professionals, staff and the provider. We were assured people received the care they required in a person centred manner. We saw a low level of impact of the breaches on the delivery of people’s care and their experience and safety. This was due to the stable staff team who knew people well and understood their care needs and risks.
Although further work was required to achieve compliance with the breaches. We saw the provider was motivated and had made progress. In some areas, such as with the work on fire safety, progress had been inhibited due to factors, outside their control. The provider understood the need to be able to evidence the work both they and staff completed.
It will take further time for them to be able to fully establish and embed all of the systems they need and to delegate responsibilities to staff. To ensure the whole team is clear about the expectations of them within their role and their contribution to achieving the aims and objectives of the service.
We have asked the provider for an action plan in response to the concerns found at this assessment.
-
Safe
No rating
Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question inadequate. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed.
The provider was previously in breach of legal regulations in relation to safe care and treatment, safeguarding and safety of the premises. Whilst we found improvements had been made, further work was required, and the provider remained in breach of these regulations.
-
Effective
No rating
Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.
At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has remained requires improvement. This meant the effectiveness of people’s care, treatment and support did not always achieve good outcomes or was inconsistent.
The provider was previously in breach of legal regulations in relation to consent. Whilst we found improvements had been made, further work was required, and the provider remained in breach of this regulation.
-
Responsive
Good
Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.
At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.
-
Well-led
No rating
Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.
At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has remained requires improvement. This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care.
The provider was previously in breach of legal regulations in relation to governance. Whilst we found improvements had been made, further work was required, and the provider remained in breach of this regulation.
The provider was previously in breach of the legal regulation in relation to notifications. Improvements were found at this assessment, and the provider was no longer in breach of this regulation.
Questions to ask when you visit
- Safe was rated Requires improvement on 13 April 2026. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
- Effective was rated Requires improvement on 13 April 2026. Ask about staff training and how health appointments are arranged.
- Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 13 April 2026. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
Registration details
- Registered manager
- Beverley Walton
- Registered with the CQC since
- What it provides
- Care home service without nursing
- Who it supports
- Dementia, Older People
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)7 inspection reports, latest 25 February 2021. Latest assessment published 13 April 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.
The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
- Provider
- Whitehaven Rest Home Limited
- Ownership type
- Organisation
- Companies House number
- 04479261 (opens Companies House)
Getting help from Hampshire County Council
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at Hampshire County Council
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 0300 555 1386, Monday, Wednesday and Thursday 8.30am to 5pm, Tuesday 9.30am to 5pm, Friday 8.30am to 4.30pm
- Contact adult social care online
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: Hampshire County Council
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does Whitehaven Residential Home provide nursing care?
- No. The Care Quality Commission lists Whitehaven Residential Home as a care home without nursing.
- How many beds does Whitehaven Residential Home have?
- The Care Quality Commission's register lists 15 beds at Whitehaven Residential Home.
- When was Whitehaven Residential Home last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Whitehaven Residential Home was published on 13 April 2026.
- Who runs Whitehaven Residential Home?
- Whitehaven Residential Home is run by Whitehaven Rest Home Limited.
- What is Whitehaven Residential Home's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 13 April 2026.
Contact
- Phone
- 023 9259 2300
- Address
- 22 Whitehaven, Horndean, Waterlooville, PO8 0DN Map (opens Google Maps)
Compare nearby
Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Pear Tree Court (Good, 0.4 miles away) and Wisteria Lodge (Outstanding, 0.7 miles away).
Nearest care homes:
- – Bere Grove Care Home Not yet rated, 0.3 miles away
- – Acacia House Nursing Home Not yet rated, 0.4 miles away
- G Pear Tree Court Good, 0.4 miles away
- O Wisteria Lodge Outstanding, 0.7 miles away
- G Durlands Road Good, 0.8 miles away