Rated Care Homes

Wisteria Lodge

O

Outstanding

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 3 ratings

    Its last inspection improved it from Good to Outstanding.

  • This month

    The latest rating was published.

  • 25 of 420

    rated care homes in Hampshire are rated Outstanding, like this one.

Wisteria Lodge: inspection record

Care home with nursing, 30 beds, Hampshire

Rated Outstanding in October 2026, up from Good.

Wisteria Lodge: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Durlands Road Good, 0.3 miles away
  2. –
    Acacia House Nursing Home Not yet rated, 0.5 miles away
  3. G
    Pear Tree Court Good, 0.5 miles away
  4. G
    Caroline House Good, 0.6 miles away
  5. RI
    Whitehaven Residential Home Requires improvement, 0.7 miles away

See all care homes in Hampshire

See all care homes in Blendworth

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 6 October 2026 (assessment visit 27 July 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment: 27 July to 4 August 2026. Wisteria Lodge is a care home registered to support older people who require nursing care, some of whom live with dementia.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Outstanding
  • Caring Outstanding
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Outstanding
Read the rest of CQC's summary

We carried out our inspection based on the information we held about the service and the length of time since the last inspection.

Leaders and staff at Wisteria Lodge had created an exceptional home where people and their families felt genuinely welcomed, safe, valued and supported. A deeply embedded culture of kindness, compassion and respect was evident throughout the service. People’s dignity, independence and emotional wellbeing were consistently prioritised, with staff demonstrating an outstanding understanding of what mattered most to each person and using this knowledge to shape highly personalised care.

People’s safety was promoted through a strong culture of openness, professional curiosity and accountability. Staff understood their responsibilities for safeguarding and raising concerns, and risks associated with people’s health conditions and support needs were proactively identified, assessed and managed. Medicines were administered safely. Staffing levels were continually reviewed to ensure they reflected people’s needs, and staff had the skills, knowledge and confidence to provide safe, effective care.

People received holistic assessments using recognised good practice tools, ensuring their physical, emotional and social needs were understood. Staff responded promptly when people’s health changed and worked exceptionally well with people, their relatives and a wide range of specialist professionals. This collaborative approach ensured people received coordinated, responsive care and achieved consistently positive outcomes.

People were at the heart of the service. Care was exceptionally personalised and reflected people’s preferences, routines, relationships and aspirations. Staff knew people exceptionally well and used this knowledge to support meaningful activity, social engagement and independence. The provider also demonstrated outstanding practice in supporting people at the end of their lives, ensuring care was compassionate, dignified and individualised.

Leaders had established consistently high standards across every aspect of the service. Expectations were clear, and staff were given the guidance, development and support needed to achieve them. Leaders recognised that staff wellbeing was fundamental to delivering high-quality care and had developed a range of meaningful initiatives to value, recognise and reward staff.

Robust governance arrangements provided strong oversight of quality, safety and outcomes. Audits were effective in identifying opportunities for improvement, with learning translated into meaningful changes in practice. People, relatives and staff were actively listened to, and their feedback resulted in improvements. Leaders had fostered an exceptional culture of learning, innovation and continuous improvement, where staff were encouraged to reflect, challenge practice and seek better ways of working.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Outstanding

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to outstanding. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently better than expected compared to similar services. People’s feedback described it as exceptional and distinctive.

  3. Caring

    Outstanding

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has been changed to outstanding. This meant people were truly respected and valued as individuals; and empowered as partners in their care in an exceptional service.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Outstanding

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to outstanding. This meant service leadership was exceptional and distinctive. Leaders and the culture they created drove and improved high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask how nursing cover works at night and at weekends.
  2. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  3. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Martina Brown
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service with nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

8 inspection reports, latest 6 February 2021. Latest assessment published 6 October 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
06412403 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Hampshire County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Wisteria Lodge provide nursing care?
Yes. The Care Quality Commission lists Wisteria Lodge as a care home with nursing.
How many beds does Wisteria Lodge have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 30 beds at Wisteria Lodge.
When was Wisteria Lodge last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Wisteria Lodge was published on 6 October 2026.
Who runs Wisteria Lodge?
Wisteria Lodge is run by Wisteria Lodge Limited.
What is Wisteria Lodge's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Outstanding, published on 6 October 2026.

Contact

Address
82 London Road, Horndean, Waterlooville, PO8 0BU Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Durlands Road Good, 0.3 miles away
  2. –
    Acacia House Nursing Home Not yet rated, 0.5 miles away
  3. G
    Pear Tree Court Good, 0.5 miles away
  4. G
    Caroline House Good, 0.6 miles away
  5. RI
    Whitehaven Residential Home Requires improvement, 0.7 miles away

See all care homes in Hampshire

See all care homes in Blendworth