Rated Care Homes

Rose Villa Nursing Home

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 6 ratings

    Its last inspection improved it from Inadequate to Good.

  • 1 month

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 52 of 72

    rated care homes in Hull are rated Good, like this one.

Rose Villa Nursing Home: inspection record

Care home with nursing, 36 beds, Hull

Rated Good in September 2026, up from Inadequate.

Rose Villa Nursing Home: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Ash Lodge Care Home Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Beverley Court Residential Home Good, 0.2 miles away
  3. G
    Murreyfield Care Centre Good, 0.2 miles away
  4. G
    Riverbank Good, 0.3 miles away
  5. G
    Lake View Manor Good, 0.3 miles away

See all care homes in Hull

See all care homes in Summergangs

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 4 September 2026 (assessment visit 10 July 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment: 14 to 27 July 2026. Rose Villa Nursing Home is a care home registered to support up to 36 people. This includes older people, people living with dementia and/or a physical disability. At the time of our inspection there were 26 people using the service. The assessment included 2 on site visits, with other information and evidence reviewed remotely. The assessment was completed to follow up on the action we told the provider to take at the previous assessment.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary

The last assessment for this service was completed on 8 January 2026 and there were breaches of regulation identified around safe care and treatment, dignity, person centred care, staffing and governance of the service. During this assessment we found improvements had been made. However, the provider remained in breach of the legal regulations in relation to governance.

The provider had made notable progress since the last assessment. The management team demonstrated a clear commitment to improvement, with quality assurance systems becoming more utilised and embedded. Some concerns remained regarding the consistency and effectiveness of care delivery and governance arrangements.

Records were not always accurate or fully completed, with discrepancies identified in accident and incident documentation. Policies and procedures were in place. However, staff did not always follow them consistently in practice.

Care records demonstrated that support was not always delivered in line with people's agreed care plans. For example, pressure area care was not always consistently provided in accordance with people’s assessed needs and documented guidance.

Audits were being completed regularly. However, actions identified through these processes were not always followed up or completed promptly. The provider’s governance tracker did not always capture actions identified during audits, resulting in insufficient monitoring to ensure that identified issues were addressed and that the necessary improvements were completed in a timely manner.

Significant improvements have been made across a range of areas within the service. Improvements to the environment had enhanced the quality and safety of the premises, including refurbishment works, replacement flooring, and the resolution of previous concerns relating to odours in communal areas. Fire safety arrangements had strengthened, with improvements to fire doors and ongoing staff training and fire drills.

Care planning and risk management processes had improved, with more detailed care plans and clearer risk assessments to guide staff practice. Governance arrangements were more established, supported by a comprehensive suite of policies, regular auditing processes, and increased provider oversight.

The registered manager demonstrated a stronger focus on quality assurance and was responsive to feedback during the assessment and showed a clear commitment to driving further improvements.

The provider has strengthened its oversight arrangements and maintained a clear focus on improving the quality and safety of care. These improvements contributed to the service's continued progress and improvement outcomes.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    No rating

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has remained requires improvement. This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to governance at the service.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 4 September 2026. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
  2. Ask how nursing cover works at night and at weekends.
  3. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.

Registration details

Registered manager
Adele Whelan
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service with nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People, Physical Disability, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

8 inspection reports, latest 15 October 2022. Latest assessment published 4 September 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
04434303 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Hull City Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Rose Villa Nursing Home provide nursing care?
Yes. The Care Quality Commission lists Rose Villa Nursing Home as a care home with nursing.
How many beds does Rose Villa Nursing Home have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 36 beds at Rose Villa Nursing Home.
When was Rose Villa Nursing Home last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Rose Villa Nursing Home was published on 4 September 2026.
Who runs Rose Villa Nursing Home?
Rose Villa Nursing Home is run by Rose Villa Care Home Limited.
What is Rose Villa Nursing Home's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 4 September 2026.

Contact

Phone
01482 472151
Address
269- 271 Beverley Road, Hull, HU5 2ST Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Ash Lodge Care Home Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Beverley Court Residential Home Good, 0.2 miles away
  3. G
    Murreyfield Care Centre Good, 0.2 miles away
  4. G
    Riverbank Good, 0.3 miles away
  5. G
    Lake View Manor Good, 0.3 miles away

See all care homes in Hull

See all care homes in Summergangs