Rated Care Homes

Longmead House

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 4 ratings

    Its last inspection improved it from Inadequate to Requires improvement.

  • 14 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 56 of 302

    rated care homes in Surrey are rated Requires improvement, like this one.

Longmead House: inspection record

Care home, 23 beds, Surrey

Rated Requires improvement in August 2025, up from Inadequate.

Longmead House: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Cherry Lodge Rest Home (Good, 0.2 miles away) and Bracken Lodge (Good, 0.3 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    Cherry Lodge Rest Home Good, 0.2 miles away
  2. RI
    Buxton Lodge Care Home Requires improvement, 0.2 miles away
  3. G
    Bracken Lodge Good, 0.3 miles away
  4. G
    Westhill Care Home Good, 0.4 miles away
  5. G
    Courthill Care Home Good, 0.5 miles away

See all care homes in Surrey

See all care homes in Caterham

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 18 August 2025 (assessment visit 25 June 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment: 3 July 2025 to 15 July 2025.

Longmead House is a care home with nursing for up to 23 older people, including people living with dementia. There were 7 people living at the home at the beginning of our assessment and 11 people living at the home at the end of our assessment.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive No rating
  • Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary

People in care homes receive accommodation and nursing or personal care as a single package under one contractual agreement. CQC regulates both the premises and the care provided, and both were looked at during this assessment.

We carried out this assessment to follow up on action we had told the provider to take following our last inspection on 18 July 2023 when we rated the service inadequate.

The service has been in special measures since that date. The purpose of special measures is to ensure that services providing inadequate care make significant improvements.

At this assessment we found improvements had been made. The service is no longer rated inadequate overall or in any of the key questions. Therefore, this service is no longer in special measures.

At our last inspection, the provider was in breach of legal regulations in relation to safety, safe recruitment, person-centredcare, and governance.

At this assessment, we found improvements had been made to safety and safe recruitment, and the provider was no longer in breach of these regulations. However, the provider remained in breach of regulations relating to person-centredcareand governance.

People did not have opportunities to take part in meaningful activities, to be involved in their local community, or to go out other than with their friends and families. This meant people’s lives lacked variety, stimulation and engagement.

The provider had invested in significant improvements to the fabric of the building since our last inspection, but was not involved in the day-to-day running of the service. This meant the provider did not have effective oversight of the service, or processes to ensure good governance was maintained in the manager’s absence.

There were enough trained and experienced staff on duty to meet people’s needs and keep them safe. Staff kept the home clean and hygienic. People’s medicines were managed safely. Lessons were learned when incidents occurred, and learning was shared with staff. Staff understood their responsibility to recognise and report abuse, and knew how to do this.

The manager and staff listened to and understood people’s needs, views and wishes. Staff worked well together to ensure people’s needs were met. Staff supported one another well and that there was a good sense of teamwork at the home. The manager and staff worked well with other professionals to achieve good outcomes for people.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question inadequate. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

    The provider was previously in breach of legal regulations in relation to safe care and treatment, and fit and proper persons employed. Improvements were found at this assessment and the provider was no longer in breach of these regulations.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    No rating

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs. At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment rating has remained requires improvement. This meant people’s needs were not always met.

    The provider was previously in breach of the legal regulation in relation to person-centred care. Improvements were not found at this assessment, and the provider remained in breach of this regulation.

  5. Well-led

    No rating

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. At our last assessment we rated this key question inadequate. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant the provider’s oversight of the service did not always support the delivery of sustainable, high-quality care.

    The provider was previously in breach of the legal regulation in relation to good governance. Improvements were not found at this assessment, and the provider remained in breach of this regulation.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Responsive was rated Requires improvement on 18 August 2025. Ask to see how care plans are kept up to date, how complaints are handled and what activities are on offer.
  2. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 18 August 2025. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
  3. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.

Registration details

Registered manager
Kressoon Balloo
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

7 inspection reports, latest 1 September 2023. Latest assessment published 18 August 2025; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Individual

Getting help from Surrey County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Longmead House provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Longmead House as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Longmead House have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 23 beds at Longmead House.
When was Longmead House last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Longmead House was published on 18 August 2025.
Who runs Longmead House?
Longmead House is run by Bridget Catherina McAleese.
What is Longmead House's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 18 August 2025.

Contact

Phone
01883 340686
Address
1 Buxton Lane, Caterham, CR3 5HG Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Cherry Lodge Rest Home (Good, 0.2 miles away) and Bracken Lodge (Good, 0.3 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    Cherry Lodge Rest Home Good, 0.2 miles away
  2. RI
    Buxton Lodge Care Home Requires improvement, 0.2 miles away
  3. G
    Bracken Lodge Good, 0.3 miles away
  4. G
    Westhill Care Home Good, 0.4 miles away
  5. G
    Courthill Care Home Good, 0.5 miles away

See all care homes in Surrey

See all care homes in Caterham