Rated Care Homes

Hill View Care Home

  • Care home
  • 1 beds
  • No nursing
  • Dementia care
  • Registered since 2011
  • Surrey, South East
G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 3 ratings

    First rated Requires improvement in 2016, most recently Good in September 2019.

  • 7 years

    since the latest rating was published. A rating this old may not show how the service is today.

  • 234 of 302

    rated care homes in Surrey are rated Good, like this one.

Hill View Care Home: inspection record

Care home, 1 beds, Surrey

Rated Good in September 2019.

Hill View Care Home: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Cedar Lodge Nursing Home Good, 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Holly Lodge Nursing Home Good, 0.1 miles away
  3. G
    Camberley Manor Good, 0.9 miles away
  4. –
    Whitebourne Not yet rated, 0.9 miles away
  5. G
    The Rivers Good, 1.1 miles away

See all care homes in Surrey

About the service

From the Care Quality Commission's inspection report published 17 September 2019. Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

The service combines a care home and a Domiciliary Care Agency (DCA). The care home provides care and support for one person living with autism. The DCA service supports two people with learning disabilities and autism in a supported living environment.

Read the rest of CQC's summary

Supported living means people have their own tenancy and can choose who supports them.

The Secretary of State has asked the Care Quality Commission (CQC) to conduct a thematic review and to make recommendations about the use of restrictive interventions in settings that provide care for people with or who might have mental health problems, learning disabilities and/or autism. Thematic reviews look in-depth at specific issues concerning quality of care across the health and social care sectors. They expand our understanding of both good and poor practice and of the potential drivers of improvement.

As part of thematic review, we carried out a survey with the manager at this inspection. This considered whether the service used any restrictive intervention practices (restraint, seclusion and segregation) when supporting people.

The service used positive behaviour support principles to support people in the least restrictive way. No restrictive intervention practices were used.

The care home service has been developed and designed in line with the principles and values that underpin Registering the Right Support and other best practice guidance. This ensures that people who use the service can live as full a life as possible and achieve the best possible outcomes. The principles reflect the need for people with learning disabilities and/or autism to live meaningful lives that include control, choice, and independence. People using the service receive planned and co-ordinated person-centred support that is appropriate and inclusive for them.

What inspectors found

People from both the care home and supported living service said they were happy with the service provided. One said; "I like the staff" and another "The staff are nice."

Read the rest of CQC's summary

People, when asked said they felt safe with the staff supporting them. Systems were in place to safeguard people. Risks to them were identified and managed. The support required with medicines was assessed, agreed and provided to people. Infection control measures were in place to prevent cross infection. Staff were suitably recruited. People were supported by a mostly long serving staff team. Staffing levels were flexible to enable the service to provide a bespoke service to people to meet their needs.

People were supported by staff who completed an induction, training and were supervised. The support required by people with health and nutritional needs was identified and provided. People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

People confirmed staff were kind and caring. Their privacy and independence were promoted. Systems were in place to deal with concerns and complaints. This enabled people to raise concerns about their care if they needed to.

People had person centred care plans in place. They were actively involved in their care and contributed to the development of care plans and reviews. Some people had staff support to access activities and holidays. This was flexible and provided in response to people's choices. People's communication needs were identified, and some people had end of life wishes explored and recorded.

People were supported by a service that was well managed. Records were accessible and up to date. The service was audited, and action taken to address any areas identified that needed improving. People and staff were complimentary of the registered provider and described them as; "Always making themselves available, very hands on and caring." Staff were committed to providing good outcomes for people.

The service applied the principles and values of Registering the Right Support and other best practice guidance. These ensure that people who use the service can live as full a life as possible and achieve the best possible outcomes that include control, choice and independence.

The outcomes for people using the service reflected the principles and values of Registering the Right Support by promoting choice and control, independence and inclusion. People's support focused on them having as many opportunities as possible for them to gain new skills and become more independent.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. The last rating is 7 years old. Ask what has changed since then.
  2. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  3. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing, Supported living service
Who it supports
Dementia, Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Mental Health, Older People, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

7 inspection reports, latest 17 September 2019. The reports are on the Care Quality Commission website.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Individual

Getting help from Surrey County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Hill View Care Home provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Hill View Care Home as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Hill View Care Home have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 1 beds at Hill View Care Home.
When was Hill View Care Home last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Hill View Care Home was published on 17 September 2019.
Who runs Hill View Care Home?
Hill View Care Home is run by Kher Khulpateea.
What is Hill View Care Home's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 17 September 2019.

Contact

Phone
01252 838199
Address
5 Essex Close, Frimley, Camberley, GU16 9FH Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Cedar Lodge Nursing Home Good, 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Holly Lodge Nursing Home Good, 0.1 miles away
  3. G
    Camberley Manor Good, 0.9 miles away
  4. –
    Whitebourne Not yet rated, 0.9 miles away
  5. G
    The Rivers Good, 1.1 miles away

See all care homes in Surrey