Rated Care Homes

Meadowcroft Care Home

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 3 ratings

    Rated Good at every inspection since 2016.

  • 4 years

    since the latest rating was published. A rating this old may not show how the service is today.

  • 250 of 309

    rated care homes in West Sussex are rated Good, like this one.

Meadowcroft Care Home: inspection record

Care home, 20 beds, West Sussex

Rated Good in April 2023.

Meadowcroft Care Home: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Elreg House Good, 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Cavell House Good, 0.5 miles away
  3. RI
    New Elmcroft Requires improvement, 0.5 miles away
  4. G
    Kathleens Lodge Rest Home Ltd Good, 0.6 miles away
  5. G
    Kingsland House Good, 0.7 miles away

See all care homes in West Sussex

See all care homes in Shoreham-by-Sea

About the service

From the Care Quality Commission's inspection report published 6 April 2023. Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Meadowcroft is a residential care home providing personal care to up to 20 people. The service provides support to older people living with age related frailties or dementia. At the time of our inspection there were 15 people using the service.

What inspectors found

People told us they felt safe and could speak with staff or management if they did not. One person told us, "I have no concerns and feel safe in their capable hands." Staff understood their duty to recognise and report signs of potential abuse, they received training and had access to safeguarding procedures. People's medicines were stored and administered safely. Staff had received relevant training and competency assessments prior to supporting people with their medicines.

Read the rest of CQC's summary

People's health risks were assessed and mitigated, care plans guided staff to support people safely. Where people were at risk of falls, the registered manager investigated possible causes and put measures in place to minimise reoccurrence. People were kept safe from the spread of infection, staff received infection prevention and control training and had appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE).

People were supported by enough staff who knew them well. Staff completed an induction period which included shadowing an experienced member of staff. The registered manager supervised staff and discussed further training opportunities with them.

People confirmed staff asked their consent before offering support. Staff told they always requesting permission before supporting a person, our observations confirmed this. People were cared for by staff who upheld their dignity and autonomy. When people spoke of the care staff, comments included, "I am very happy here, the staff are very helpful. They know me well." A relative commented, "I have a lot of respect for the home and the staff, they have so much patience."

People were able to freely move around the service as they pleased. Dementia friendly signage and clocks helped people remain orientated to time and place. People's bedrooms were personalised to their needs and wishes. People had brought furniture from their previous residence, and their ornaments, paintings, and photographs were displayed.

People contributed to their care plans and received care tailored to their individual needs. Relatives were involved in their loved ones' care and were kept well informed. One relative said, "I am kept up to date with changes or if the doctor is needed. They tell me everything including how much [person] has eaten."

People were encouraged to plan and attend social activities; staff responded to people's requests and met their wishes when they asked to spend time with staff on a one to one basis. The community was welcomed into the service, this included entertainment, visiting children and animals. The registered manager told us,

"I personally believe that age is no barrier for living a full and active life. I really believe that is the truth." People could welcome their loved ones into the service and were enabled to go out with them.

People were complimentary about the registered manager's leadership style. The registered manager involved people using the service and encouraged feedback, including complaints. One relative told us, "I think [registered manager] is very experienced, they run the home firmly and fairly, there is no doubt about who is boss, it's good, you need a strong leader. They are very nice to residents and the staff seem happy."

The registered manager undertook various quality assurance processes and had a clear vision for the service. The quality assurance processes were effective, findings contributed to an action plan for continued improvements. Staff and management were keen to learn and work with health and social care professionals. One social care professional told us, "I think since the new provider has taken over the staff are more approachable, you see staff around more."

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. The last rating is 4 years old. Ask what has changed since then.
  2. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  3. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

1 inspection report, latest 6 April 2023. The reports are on the Care Quality Commission website.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
13606296 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from West Sussex County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Meadowcroft Care Home provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Meadowcroft Care Home as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Meadowcroft Care Home have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 20 beds at Meadowcroft Care Home.
When was Meadowcroft Care Home last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Meadowcroft Care Home was published on 6 April 2023.
Who runs Meadowcroft Care Home?
Meadowcroft Care Home is run by Meadowcroft Shoreham Limited.
What is Meadowcroft Care Home's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 6 April 2023.

Contact

Phone
01273 452582
Address
30 Buckingham Road, Shoreham-by-sea, BN43 5UB Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Elreg House Good, 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Cavell House Good, 0.5 miles away
  3. RI
    New Elmcroft Requires improvement, 0.5 miles away
  4. G
    Kathleens Lodge Rest Home Ltd Good, 0.6 miles away
  5. G
    Kingsland House Good, 0.7 miles away

See all care homes in West Sussex

See all care homes in Shoreham-by-Sea