Rosevilla Residential Home
- Care home
- 45 beds
- No nursing
- Dementia care
- Registered since 2011
- Winwick, Warrington, North West
Good
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
At a glance
7 ratings
First rated Good in 2015, most recently Good in May 2026.
5 months
since the latest rating was published.
39 of 51
rated care homes in Warrington are rated Good, like this one.
Rosevilla Residential Home: inspection record
Rated Good in May 2026.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Compare nearby
- RI St Mary's Continuing Care Requires improvement, 0.2 miles away
- G Segal Gardens Good, 0.9 miles away
- G Lyme House Good, 1 mile away
- G The Old Vicarage Nursing and Residential Care Centre Good, 1.1 miles away
- G Linear Park Residential Care Home Good, 1.2 miles away
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 13 May 2026 (assessment visit 17 April 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
About the service
Rosevilla Residential Home is a residential service providing accommodation and personal care. At the time of the inspection there was 43 people using the service.
- Safe Good
- Effective Good
- Caring Good
- Responsive Good
- Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary
The service is provided over 2 floors, has large gardens and spacious communal areas.
Who the service is for
This service is registered to support older people, younger adults and people living with dementia.
Our view of the service
We carried out this inspection on 27 April 2026. This service was previously rated as good. We carried out this assessment to confirm whether the rating of good remains accurate. This report does not provide detailed information on areas where we found practice continues to meet a good standard. Instead, our findings focus on any areas where the service needs to improve or where we found exceptional practice.
People can only be deprived of their liberty to receive care and treatment with appropriate legal authority. In care homes, this can be done through a procedure called the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS), which is part of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA). We checked whether the service was working within the principles of the MCA and how they managed DoLS within the service. We found that staff and management worked within the principles of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA). Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS) authorisations were appropriately applied for and overseen. People were not subject to unlawful or excessive restrictions they had choice, control and freedom over their lives.
People were supported by a stable staff team who knew them well, and we observed positive, kind and respectful interactions throughout the day. People told us they felt safe and well cared for. Relatives spoke positively about the care, environment and staff approach, describing the service as welcoming and responsive. People appeared comfortable, well-presented and engaged in daily life, including during shared mealtimes and activities.
Care and support were delivered in a personcentred way. Staff offered choice and promoted independence, including around daily routines, meals and activities. Risks were well managed and proportionate, with clear care planning to promote people’s safety.
Medicines were managed safely, with good oversight and evidence of learning where recording issues had been identified. The environment was clean, well maintained and safe, with suitable adaptations and equipment to meet people’s needs, including for those living with dementia.
Staffing levels during the inspection were sufficient to meet people’s needs. Staff were appropriately trained and supported.
Leaders were visible and responsive. There was evidence of learning from incidents, complaints and previous concerns, with improvements made in recent years. Overall, the service demonstrated a caring culture with committed leadership and a focus on people’s experiences and outcomes.
-
Safe
Good
Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm
-
Effective
Good
Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.
-
Caring
Good
Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect and involved as partners in their care.
-
Responsive
Good
Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.
-
Well-led
Good
Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.
Questions to ask when you visit
- Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
- Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.
Registration details
- Registered manager
- Peter Nesarajah
- Registered with the CQC since
- What it provides
- Care home service without nursing
- Who it supports
- Dementia, Older People, Younger Adults
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)10 inspection reports, latest 10 February 2024. Latest assessment published 13 May 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.
The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
- Ownership type
- Organisation
- Companies House number
- 04741967 (opens Companies House)
Getting help from Warrington Borough Council
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at Warrington Borough Council
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 01925 443322
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: Warrington Borough Council
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does Rosevilla Residential Home provide nursing care?
- No. The Care Quality Commission lists Rosevilla Residential Home as a care home without nursing.
- How many beds does Rosevilla Residential Home have?
- The Care Quality Commission's register lists 45 beds at Rosevilla Residential Home.
- When was Rosevilla Residential Home last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Rosevilla Residential Home was published on 13 May 2026.
- Who runs Rosevilla Residential Home?
- Rosevilla Residential Home is run by Rosevilla Residential Home Limited.
- What is Rosevilla Residential Home's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 13 May 2026.
Contact
- Phone
- 01925 228637
- Address
- Penkford Lane, Collins Green, Warrington, WA5 4EE Map (opens Google Maps)
Compare nearby
- RI St Mary's Continuing Care Requires improvement, 0.2 miles away
- G Segal Gardens Good, 0.9 miles away
- G Lyme House Good, 1 mile away
- G The Old Vicarage Nursing and Residential Care Centre Good, 1.1 miles away
- G Linear Park Residential Care Home Good, 1.2 miles away