Bushell House
- Care home
- 31 beds
- No nursing
- Registered since 2011
- Fulwood Row, Lancashire, North West
Good
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
At a glance
4 ratings
Rated Good at every inspection since 2015.
7 months
since the latest rating was published.
306 of 381
rated care homes in Lancashire are rated Good, like this one.
Bushell House: inspection record
Rated Good in April 2026.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Compare nearby
- G Crystal Hall Good, 0.5 miles away
- RI Belmont Care Home Requires improvement, 2.3 miles away
- G Neurological Centre - Lancashire Good, 2.4 miles away
- G Meadowfield House Home for Older People Good, 2.5 miles away
- G Preston Private Care Home Good, 2.5 miles away
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 1 April 2026 (assessment visit 25 February 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
Date of assessment: 12 and 13 March 2026. Bushell House is a care home (without nursing) and is registered to provide support for older people.
- Safe Good
- Effective Good
- Caring Good
- Responsive Outstanding
- Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary
The provider had a good learning culture and people could raise concerns. People were protected and kept safe from the risk of abuse. Staff understood and managed risks. There were enough staff with the right skills, qualifications and experience. Managers made sure staff received training and regular appraisals to maintain high-quality care. Staff managed medicines well and involved people in planning any changes.
People were involved in assessments of their needs. Staff reviewed assessments taking account of people’s communication, personal and health needs. Care was based on latest evidence and good practice. People had enough to eat and drink to stay healthy. Staff worked with all agencies involved in people’s care, for the best outcomes and smooth transitions when moving services. They monitored people’s health to support healthy living. Staff made sure people understood their care and treatment to enable them to give informed consent.
People were treated with kindness and compassion. Staff protected their privacy and dignity. People had choice in their care and were encouraged to maintain relationships with family and friends. Staff responded to people in a timely way. The provider supported staff wellbeing.
People were involved in decisions about their care. Staff provided information people could understand. People knew how to give feedback and were confident the provider took it seriously and acted on it. The service was easy to access and worked to eliminate discrimination. People received fair and equal care and treatment. People were involved in planning their care and understood options around choosing to withdraw or not receive care.
Leaders and staff had a shared vision and culture based on listening, learning and trust. Leaders were visible, knowledgeable and supportive, helping staff develop in their roles. Staff felt supported to give feedback and were treated equally, free from bullying or harassment. Staff understood their roles and responsibilities. Managers worked with the local community to deliver the best possible care and were receptive to new ideas. There was a culture of continuous improvement with staff given time and resources to try new ideas.
-
Safe
Good
Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.
-
Effective
Good
Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.
-
Caring
Good
Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.
-
Responsive
Outstanding
Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to outstanding. This meant services were tailored to meet the needs of individuals and delivered to ensure flexibility, choice and continuity of care.
-
Well-led
Good
Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.
Questions to ask when you visit
- Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
- Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.
Registration details
- Registered manager
- Rebecca Marrow
- Registered with the CQC since
- What it provides
- Care home service without nursing
- Who it supports
- Older People
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)7 inspection reports, latest 26 November 2020. Latest assessment published 1 April 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.
The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
- Provider
- Trustees of Bushell House
- Ownership type
- Organisation
- Charity number
- 221797
Getting help from Lancashire County Council
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at Lancashire County Council
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 0300 123 6720. Out-of-hours emergencies: 0300 123 6722
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: Lancashire County Council
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does Bushell House provide nursing care?
- No. The Care Quality Commission lists Bushell House as a care home without nursing.
- How many beds does Bushell House have?
- The Care Quality Commission's register lists 31 beds at Bushell House.
- When was Bushell House last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Bushell House was published on 1 April 2026.
- Who runs Bushell House?
- Bushell House is run by Trustees of Bushell House.
- What is Bushell House's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 1 April 2026.
Contact
- Phone
- 01772 865225
- Address
- Mill Lane, Goosnargh, Preston, PR3 2BJ Map (opens Google Maps)
Compare nearby
- G Crystal Hall Good, 0.5 miles away
- RI Belmont Care Home Requires improvement, 2.3 miles away
- G Neurological Centre - Lancashire Good, 2.4 miles away
- G Meadowfield House Home for Older People Good, 2.5 miles away
- G Preston Private Care Home Good, 2.5 miles away