Rated Care Homes

Apple Trees Care & Reablement Centre

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 4 ratings

    Its last inspection improved it from Requires improvement to Good.

  • 12 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 177 of 254

    rated care homes in Lincolnshire are rated Good, like this one.

Apple Trees Care & Reablement Centre: inspection record

Care home, 64 beds, Lincolnshire

Rated Good in October 2025, up from Requires improvement.

Apple Trees Care & Reablement Centre: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Royal Windsor Care Home Good, 0.2 miles away
  2. RI
    Kings Court Nursing Home Requires improvement, 0.9 miles away
  3. G
    Belvoir House Care Home Good, 0.9 miles away
  4. G
    Newton House Good, 1 mile away
  5. O
    OSJCT Gregory House Outstanding, 1.1 miles away

See all care homes in Lincolnshire

See all care homes in Grantham

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 29 October 2025 (assessment visit 29 May 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

The service’s assessment started on 2 September 2025

The service demonstrated a strong commitment to ensuring people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. A positive safety culture was evident, with staff actively encouraged to report incidents and engage in learning. The service applied the principles of the Mental Capacity Act and Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards appropriately, with clear documentation of best interest decisions.

  • Safe Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

Staffing levels generally met the assessed needs of the service, with agency staff used to maintain safe coverage when required. Recruitment processes were safe and thorough, and staff received comprehensive training across key areas such as safeguarding, infection control, and medicine administration.

The physical environment was safe, secure, and well-maintained. Infection prevention and control measures were well embedded. Cleanliness was consistently maintained and staff followed clear protocols and used PPE appropriately.

Medicines were managed safely. Staff were trained in safe administration, and any errors were investigated with findings shared to support learning and improvement.

Leadership within the service was strong, inclusive, and aligned with a clear strategic vision. Staff understood and applied the provider’s values in their daily practice, with a focus on person-centred care and upholding people’s rights. This was reflected in the way staff supported people to make decisions, even when communication was challenging.

Managers were visible, approachable, and supportive. Staff consistently reported feeling valued and able to raise concerns. An open-door policy was in place, and whistle blowing procedures were clearly understood and accessible. This fostered a culture of openness.

Communication across the service was effective. Staff, residents, and families were encouraged to share feedback, and management responded proactively. Regular meetings and supervisions provided structured opportunities for dialogue and reflection.

Governance arrangements were well established. A comprehensive quality monitoring programme was in place, with regular audits and clear accountability. The registered manager and deputy manager worked closely to strengthen quality assurance, particularly in areas such as care planning, medicine management, and incident reporting.

Partnership working was a notable strength. The service maintained strong relationships with health professionals and local authorities, which supported seamless care delivery and positive outcomes. The active recovery unit was an example of how the service supported individuals to regain independence and return to their homes safely.

Continuous learning and innovation were embedded in the service. Staff had access to structured training programs, including specialist modules tailored to the needs of the people they supported. The registered manager participated in the provider’s regular home manager’s meetings, and the provider employs specialist staff to ensure best practice is shared across services.

  1. Safe

    Good

    This means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to Good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Responsive

    Good

    This means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question Good. At this assessment the rating has remained Good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  3. Well-led

    Good

    This means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.At our last assessment we rated this key question Requires Improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to Good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  2. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Lee Morgan
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People, Physical Disability, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

4 inspection reports, latest 20 April 2021. Latest assessment published 29 October 2025; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
The Orders Of St. John Care TrustBrand: Orders of St John Care Trust
Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
03073089 (opens Companies House)
Charity number
1048355

The Orders Of St. John Care Trust runs 56 services in England, 9 of them in the East Midlands. 51 are rated Good or Outstanding, 3 are rated Requires improvement or Inadequate and 2 have no rating yet.

Other services run by The Orders Of St. John Care Trust

  1. O
    Grace Care Centre Outstanding. Care home with nursing, South Gloucestershire, South West
  2. O
    Monkscroft Care Centre Outstanding. Care home with nursing, Gloucestershire, South West
  3. O
    OSJCT Gregory House Outstanding. Care home, Lincolnshire
  4. O
    OSJCT Hartsholme House Outstanding. Care home, Lincolnshire

See all 56 services run by The Orders Of St. John Care Trust

Getting help from Lincolnshire County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Apple Trees Care & Reablement Centre provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Apple Trees Care & Reablement Centre as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Apple Trees Care & Reablement Centre have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 64 beds at Apple Trees Care & Reablement Centre.
When was Apple Trees Care & Reablement Centre last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Apple Trees Care & Reablement Centre was published on 29 October 2025.
Who runs Apple Trees Care & Reablement Centre?
Apple Trees Care & Reablement Centre is run by The Orders Of St. John Care Trust. It runs 56 services in England, 9 of them in the East Midlands.
What is Apple Trees Care & Reablement Centre's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 29 October 2025.

Contact

Phone
01476 542700
Address
Arlington Gardens, Grantham, NG31 7GQ Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Royal Windsor Care Home Good, 0.2 miles away
  2. RI
    Kings Court Nursing Home Requires improvement, 0.9 miles away
  3. G
    Belvoir House Care Home Good, 0.9 miles away
  4. G
    Newton House Good, 1 mile away
  5. O
    OSJCT Gregory House Outstanding, 1.1 miles away

See all care homes in Lincolnshire

See all care homes in Grantham