Rated Care Homes

The Beeches Residential Home

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 3 ratings

    Its last inspection moved it down from Good to Requires improvement.

  • 1 month

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 28 of 156

    rated care homes in Suffolk are rated Requires improvement, like this one.

The Beeches Residential Home: inspection record

Care home, 44 beds, Suffolk

Rated Requires improvement in September 2026, down from Good.

The Beeches Residential Home: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Stowlangtoft Hall Nursing Home (Outstanding, 2.1 miles away) and Montana Residential Home (Outstanding, 3.3 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. O
    Stowlangtoft Hall Nursing Home Outstanding, 2.1 miles away
  2. RI
    Ashmore Nursing Home Requires improvement, 3 miles away
  3. O
    Montana Residential Home Outstanding, 3.3 miles away
  4. G
    Fornham House Residential Home Good, 5.4 miles away
  5. –
    Abbeygate Manor Not yet rated, 5.4 miles away

See all care homes in Suffolk

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 28 September 2026 (assessment visit 29 June 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of inspection 20 July 2026 to 1 September 2026.

The Beeches Residential Care Home is a care service registered to support 44 people. At the time of our inspection, there were 37 people living at the service, many of whom were living with dementia. We carried out this inspection due to the length of time since the previous inspection.

  • Safe No rating
  • Effective No rating
  • Caring No rating
  • Responsive No rating
  • Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary

At this inspection we found 6 breaches of the legal requirements in relation to dignity, mental health act, safe care and treatment, premises and equipment, staffing and good governance.

This service supports a large number of people living with advanced dementia, many of whom require high levels of supervision, reassurance, meaningful engagement and specialist support. Staff were generally observed to be caring, compassionate and committed to people's well-being, and relatives were positive about the kindness shown by staff. However, the service was not consistently organised or resourced in a way that enabled people to receive safe, effective and person-centred care.

Many of the concerns identified were linked to insufficient staffing levels, ineffective deployment of staff and weaknesses in leadership oversight. Although staff knew people well and were well intentioned, there were not always enough staff available to provide the level of personalised support required. As a result, care was often task-focused rather than centred around people's individual preferences, choices and wellbeing. People were not always supported to maintain their independence, choice and control, particularly during busy periods of the day.

The inspection also found that staff did not always have access to sufficiently detailed dementia-specific training. As many people living at the service experienced advanced dementia and behaviours associated with distress, staff were at times faced with complex situations they did not feel fully confident or equipped to manage. This reduced assurance that people consistently received care informed by current dementia care best practice.

Concerns identified across care planning, risk management, medicines, environmental safety, safeguarding and governance indicated that leadership oversight and quality assurance systems had not been sufficiently effective in identifying and addressing risks. There was no evidence that the provider had been aware of the full extent of these concerns prior to the inspection. Following feedback from the inspection team, the provider responded positively, demonstrated openness to learning and improvement, and sought external specialist support. The provider has also since engaged a dementia care consultant and other specialist professionals to help review practice and support the required improvements. A comprehensive action plan has been developed, with immediate action taken to address environmental risks, staffing levels, care records, medicines management and governance arrangements. While these actions were positive, many remain at an early stage and require embedding to ensure sustained improvement.

Overall, whilst staff demonstrated kindness and commitment to the people they supported, the service was not consistently delivering care that was safe, responsive and person-centred for people living with advanced dementia. Improvements were required to strengthen governance, leadership, staffing, dementia care practice and oversight.

  1. Safe

    No rating

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last inspection we rated this key question good. At this inspection the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to people’s safe care and treatment, staffing, the Mental Capacity Act, the ways people’s medicines were managed and the safety of the premises.

  2. Effective

    No rating

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last inspection we rated this key question good. At this inspection the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant the effectiveness of people’s care, treatment and support did not always achieve good outcomes or was inconsistent.

  3. Caring

    No rating

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last inspection we rated this key question good. At this inspection the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant people did not always feel well-supported, cared for or treated with dignity and respect.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to people’s dignity.

  4. Responsive

    No rating

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last inspection we rated this key question good. At this inspection the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant people’s needs were not always met.

  5. Well-led

    No rating

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last inspection we rated this key question good. At this inspection the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to governance at the service.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 28 September 2026. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Effective was rated Requires improvement on 28 September 2026. Ask about staff training and how health appointments are arranged.
  3. Caring was rated Requires improvement on 28 September 2026. Ask how staff protect dignity and how residents are involved in decisions about their care.
  4. Responsive was rated Requires improvement on 28 September 2026. Ask to see how care plans are kept up to date, how complaints are handled and what activities are on offer.

Registration details

Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

6 inspection reports, latest 24 April 2021. Latest assessment published 28 September 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
04712597 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Suffolk County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does The Beeches Residential Home provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists The Beeches Residential Home as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does The Beeches Residential Home have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 44 beds at The Beeches Residential Home.
When was The Beeches Residential Home last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for The Beeches Residential Home was published on 28 September 2026.
Who runs The Beeches Residential Home?
The Beeches Residential Home is run by S & A Care Limited.
What is The Beeches Residential Home's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 28 September 2026.

Contact

Phone
01359 230773
Address
39-43 High Street, Ixworth, Bury St Edmunds, IP31 2HJ Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Stowlangtoft Hall Nursing Home (Outstanding, 2.1 miles away) and Montana Residential Home (Outstanding, 3.3 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. O
    Stowlangtoft Hall Nursing Home Outstanding, 2.1 miles away
  2. RI
    Ashmore Nursing Home Requires improvement, 3 miles away
  3. O
    Montana Residential Home Outstanding, 3.3 miles away
  4. G
    Fornham House Residential Home Good, 5.4 miles away
  5. –
    Abbeygate Manor Not yet rated, 5.4 miles away

See all care homes in Suffolk