Alsley Lodge
- Care home
- 33 beds
- No nursing
- Registered since 2011
- Towngate, Lancashire, North West
Outstanding
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
At a glance
4 ratings
Its last inspection improved it from Requires improvement to Outstanding.
11 months
since the latest rating was published.
14 of 381
rated care homes in Lancashire are rated Outstanding, like this one.
Alsley Lodge: inspection record
Rated Outstanding in November 2025, up from Requires improvement.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Compare nearby
- G Stocks Hall Mawdesley Good, 2.2 miles away
- – Croston Park Not yet rated, 2.3 miles away
- G Park Grove Care Home Good, 2.7 miles away
- RI Brandreth Lodge Nursing Home Requires improvement, 3.1 miles away
- G Stocks Hall Nursing Home - Burscough Good, 3.2 miles away
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 26 November 2025 (assessment visit 5 August 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
Date of assessment: 11 August to 20 August 2025. The service is a residential care home, supporting up to 33 older people. At the time of our assessment, 32 people were living at the home.
- Safe Good
- Effective Outstanding
- Caring Outstanding
- Responsive Good
- Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary
An unannounced inspection took place to review the quality of care and compliance with legal regulations. At the last inspection, the service was in breach of the legal regulations relating to person-centred care, safe care and treatment and good governance. At this inspection, enough improvements had been made, and the provider was no longer in breach of these legal regulations.
Managers had improved systems to investigate, record and learn from incidents and staff had a good understanding of safeguarding. Information about risk was now robust and people were supported effectively when they communicated a need, emotion or distress. The environment was found to be safe and hygienic, with the appropriate checks in place. Recruitment processes and staffing levels had improved. Staff now had their competence routinely checked, and medicines management systems were safer.
People and their relatives had more involvement in the care planning process, and there was a good level of information in people’s care plans and records. Managers and staff had an excellent understanding of people’s nutrition and hydration needs, and supported people to achieve positive outcomes. Information sharing between the team and healthcare partners was effective, and robust systems had been introduced to monitor people’s health and wellbeing, and prevent deterioration. Assessments of people’s capacity were now carried out in line with The Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA).
Staff treated people exceptionally well and helped protect their dignity. Managers and staff had an excellent understanding of people’s backgrounds, needs and preferences and celebrated people’s strengths. There was a varied range of activities available, and people were supported to maintain their independence. Staff understood and responded to signs of distress quickly. Staff wellbeing and morale was good.
Care plans were now person-centred, and continuity of care was prioritised. People’s communication needs were met, and the home was very accessible; with managers advocating for people to ensure they had the care and treatment they needed, when they needed it. Advanced decisions and people’s end of life needs and wishes were well documented, and the service facilitated positive working relationships with a local funeral service and the hospice.
There was a positive, compassionate culture at the service and staff confirmed they were able to speak up. The registered manager and deputy manager were capable and led the home effectively. Digital systems had been introduced, improving checks and audits and contributing to an excellent level of oversight. Managers shared learning and resources with other services and developed positive connections within the local community. Managers and staff strived to continuously raise standards and enhance people’s quality of life.
-
Safe
Good
Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.
At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.
-
Effective
Outstanding
Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.
At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to outstanding. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently better than expected, compared to similar services.
-
Caring
Outstanding
Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.
At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to outstanding. This meant people were truly respected and valued as individuals; and empowered as partners in their care in an exceptional service.
-
Responsive
Good
Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.
At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.
-
Well-led
Good
Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.
At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.
Questions to ask when you visit
- Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
- Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.
Registration details
- Registered manager
- Amy McEvoy
- Registered with the CQC since
- What it provides
- Care home service without nursing
- Who it supports
- Older People
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)6 inspection reports, latest 11 July 2020. Latest assessment published 26 November 2025; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.
The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
- Provider
- Raycare LimitedBrand: Carewise Homes
- Ownership type
- Organisation
- Companies House number
- 05312918 (opens Companies House)
Raycare Limited runs 3 services in England, 2 of them in the North West. 3 are rated Good or Outstanding.
Other services run by Raycare Limited
- G Hillcroft Residential Care Home Good. Care home, Lancashire
- G Summerhill Good. Care home, Northumberland, North East
Getting help from Lancashire County Council
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at Lancashire County Council
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 0300 123 6720. Out-of-hours emergencies: 0300 123 6722
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: Lancashire County Council
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does Alsley Lodge provide nursing care?
- No. The Care Quality Commission lists Alsley Lodge as a care home without nursing.
- How many beds does Alsley Lodge have?
- The Care Quality Commission's register lists 33 beds at Alsley Lodge.
- When was Alsley Lodge last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Alsley Lodge was published on 26 November 2025.
- Who runs Alsley Lodge?
- Alsley Lodge is run by Raycare Limited. It runs 3 services in England, 2 of them in the North West.
- What is Alsley Lodge's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Outstanding, published on 26 November 2025.
Contact
- Phone
- 01704 821713
- Address
- Station Road, Rufford, Ormskirk, L40 1TB Map (opens Google Maps)
Compare nearby
- G Stocks Hall Mawdesley Good, 2.2 miles away
- – Croston Park Not yet rated, 2.3 miles away
- G Park Grove Care Home Good, 2.7 miles away
- RI Brandreth Lodge Nursing Home Requires improvement, 3.1 miles away
- G Stocks Hall Nursing Home - Burscough Good, 3.2 miles away