Rated Care Homes

Lord Hardy Court

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 4 ratings

    Rated Good at every inspection since 2014.

  • 4 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 59 of 72

    rated care homes in Rotherham are rated Good, like this one.

Lord Hardy Court: inspection record

Care home, 60 beds, Rotherham

Rated Good in June 2026.

Lord Hardy Court: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    The Abbeys Good, 1.1 miles away
  2. O
    Fitzwilliam Lodge Outstanding, 1.2 miles away
  3. G
    Westfield House Good, 1.2 miles away
  4. G
    Jubilee Care Home Good, 1.3 miles away
  5. G
    Holly House Residential Home Good, 1.4 miles away

See all care homes in Rotherham

See all care homes in Rawmarsh

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 30 June 2026 (assessment visit 20 April 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of Assessment: 3 June to 15 June 2026. The service is a residential care home providing support to older people, including people living with dementia. The service also provides support to people with a learning disability. We carried out an assessment looking at all the quality statements and all key questions. Our decision to inspect the service was due to the age of the rating. At our last assessment the service was rated good and at this inspection the service had remained good.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

We expect health and social care providers to guarantee people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices and independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted. ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ is the guidance CQC follows to make assessments and judgements about services supporting people with a learning disability and autistic people and providers must have regard to it.

We found the provider was meeting the principles of Right support, right care, right culture. People received their medicines safely and as prescribed. People lived in a clean environment. The provider was in the process of refurbishment to improve the service design. People were treated with respect and dignity. There were systems to investigate and learn from accidents, incidents and safeguarding concerns.

The service was a large home, bigger than most domestic style properties. Lord Hardy Court accommodates up to 60 people in one adapted building that is divided into four units. Each unit can accommodate up to 15 people, and 1 unit was being occupied by people with a learning disability. This is larger than current best practice guidance, however, people were happy and content in their living environment and had access to outside space freely.

Accidents and incidents were analysed and trends and patterns identified to mitigate future risks. Lessons were learnt from safety events and staff were involved in changing practice to improve the service. The service was clean and well presented. Maintenance checks were carried out in line with expected standards. People receive their medicines as prescribed; however, we identified some minor issues which were acted on immediately. Staff were recruited safely and pre-employment checks completed appropriately. Risks associated with people's care are identified and managed to keep people safe.

People's needs were assessed and care delivered in line with them. People had access to healthcare professionals and care plans clearly documented their advice and showed this was followed. People had access to good nutrition and hydration, and modified diets were provided where required. Staff and teams worked well together and daily records were clearly written. Handover sessions took place to ensure important information was passed between staff

Staff were caring in their approach and included people as partners in their own care. People had access to social activities and there was a good sense of involvement of people and listening to their voice. People had access to information which was displayed around the home and available in their bedrooms. Complaints were recorded and responded to appropriately, and duty of candour applied, and lessons learned were identified.

The management team had governance systems in place which helped them identify and address issues as they arose. Timely action was taken to ensure the quality of the service was maintained.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  2. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Mental Health, Older People, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

8 inspection reports, latest 5 May 2021. Latest assessment published 30 June 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation

Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council runs 5 services, all in Yorkshire and the Humber. 4 are rated Good or Outstanding and 1 has no rating yet.

Other services run by Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council

  1. G
    Conway Good. Care home, Rotherham
  2. G
    Davies Court Good. Care home, Rotherham
  3. G
    Home Enabling Service - Rotherham MBC Good. Home care, Rotherham
  4. –
    RMBC – Supported Living Not yet rated. Home care, Rotherham

Getting help from Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Lord Hardy Court provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Lord Hardy Court as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Lord Hardy Court have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 60 beds at Lord Hardy Court.
When was Lord Hardy Court last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Lord Hardy Court was published on 30 June 2026.
Who runs Lord Hardy Court?
Lord Hardy Court is run by Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council. It runs 5 services, all in Yorkshire and the Humber.
What is Lord Hardy Court's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 30 June 2026.

Contact

Phone
01709 336188
Address
Green Rise, Upper Haugh, Rawmash, Rotherham, S62 7DH Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    The Abbeys Good, 1.1 miles away
  2. O
    Fitzwilliam Lodge Outstanding, 1.2 miles away
  3. G
    Westfield House Good, 1.2 miles away
  4. G
    Jubilee Care Home Good, 1.3 miles away
  5. G
    Holly House Residential Home Good, 1.4 miles away

See all care homes in Rotherham

See all care homes in Rawmarsh