Rated Care Homes

Ashdale House

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 5 ratings

    Its last inspection improved it from Requires improvement to Good.

  • 7 years

    since the latest rating was published. A rating this old may not show how the service is today.

  • 214 of 258

    rated care homes in East Sussex are rated Good, like this one.

Ashdale House: inspection record

Care home, 11 beds, East Sussex

Rated Good in March 2020, up from Requires improvement.

Ashdale House: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Little Acorns Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    The Emilie Galloway Home of Rest Good, 0.1 miles away
  3. RI
    Grange House Requires improvement, 0.1 miles away
  4. G
    Ingham House Good, 0.1 miles away
  5. G
    Berry Pomeroy Good, 0.2 miles away

See all care homes in East Sussex

See all care homes in Eastbourne

About the service

From the Care Quality Commission's inspection report published 4 March 2020. Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Ashdale House is a residential care home providing personal care to eight people with a learning disability. The service can support up to 11 people.

Read the rest of CQC's summary

The care service had been designed, developed and registered before 'Registering the Right Support' and other best practice guidance was published. However, the registered manager was working to ensure that developments were designed in line with the values that underpin the Registering the Right Support and other best practice guidance. These values include choice, promotion of independence and inclusion. People with learning disabilities and autism using the service can live as ordinary a life as any citizen. People using the service receive planned and co-ordinated person-centred support that is appropriate and inclusive for them.

What inspectors found

The provider, registered manager and staff team had worked hard to address the areas for improvement following the last inspection. Staff training had continued to be developed and become embedded. New opportunities for learning had been identified and staff learning continued. Mental capacity assessments were individual and decision specific. People's care plans were person centred and records related to decisions made, were well completed. Changes had been made to the quality assurance system and this now identified areas that needed development. There was a positive culture at the home.

Read the rest of CQC's summary

People were supported by staff who treated them with kindness and care. Staff were patient, they understood people's needs, choices and knew what was important to each person. People were enabled to make their own decisions and choices about the care and support they received. Care and support was person centred.

People were enabled to maintain their own interests and friendships. Staff supported them to take part in activities of their choice to meet their individual needs and wishes and were meaningful to them. People had an activity planner so they knew what they were doing each day. These had been developed with staff.

Risk assessments provided guidance about individual and environmental risks. Staff understood the risks associated with the people they supported. They were able to tell us how they supported people to keep them safe and help to retain their independence. People were supported to receive their medicines when they needed them.

People were protected from the risks of harm, abuse or discrimination because staff knew what actions they should take if they identified concerns. There were enough staff, who had been safely recruited, working to provide the support people needed.

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the

least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

The service applied the principles and values of Registering the Right Support and other best practice guidance. These ensure that people who use the service can live as full a life as possible and achieve the best possible outcomes that include control, choice and independence.

The outcomes for people using the service reflected the principles and values of Registering the Right Support by promoting choice and control, independence and inclusion. People's support focused on them having as many opportunities as possible for them to gain new skills and become more independent.

Staff received training and support that enabled them to deliver the specific support that people needed. People's health and well-being needs were met. They were supported to see their GP and access healthcare services when they were unwell and to maintain their ongoing health needs. Peoples nutritional needs were met. They were supported to eat and drink a variety of food that they enjoyed and had chosen.

Quality assurance systems had been developed and identified all areas for improvement. People's records were person centred and provided guidance for staff. There was a positive culture at the home.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. The last rating is 7 years old. Ask what has changed since then.
  2. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  3. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Jomon Cherian
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

9 inspection reports, latest 4 March 2020. The reports are on the Care Quality Commission website.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
Alliance Home Care (Learning Disabilities) LimitedBrand: Allied Care Limited
Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
03233603 (opens Companies House)

Alliance Home Care (Learning Disabilities) Limited runs 3 services, all in the South East. 3 are rated Good or Outstanding.

Other services run by Alliance Home Care (Learning Disabilities) Limited

  1. G
    Ashgrange House Good. Care home, East Sussex
  2. G
    Lingfield Good. Care home, West Sussex

Getting help from East Sussex County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Ashdale House provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Ashdale House as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Ashdale House have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 11 beds at Ashdale House.
When was Ashdale House last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Ashdale House was published on 4 March 2020.
Who runs Ashdale House?
Ashdale House is run by Alliance Home Care (Learning Disabilities) Limited. It runs 3 services, all in the South East.
What is Ashdale House's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 4 March 2020.

Contact

Phone
01323 728000
Address
14 Silverdale Road, Eastbourne, BN20 7AU Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Little Acorns Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    The Emilie Galloway Home of Rest Good, 0.1 miles away
  3. RI
    Grange House Requires improvement, 0.1 miles away
  4. G
    Ingham House Good, 0.1 miles away
  5. G
    Berry Pomeroy Good, 0.2 miles away

See all care homes in East Sussex

See all care homes in Eastbourne