Rated Care Homes

The Firs Residential Home

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 4 ratings

    Its last inspection moved it down from Good to Requires improvement.

  • 18 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 41 of 219

    rated care homes in Derbyshire are rated Requires improvement, like this one.

The Firs Residential Home: inspection record

Care home, 28 beds, Derbyshire

Rated Requires improvement in April 2025, down from Good.

The Firs Residential Home: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Alexandra Care Home (Good, 1.2 miles away) and Woodhall Park Nursing Home (Good, 1.3 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    Alexandra Care Home Good, 1.2 miles away
  2. G
    Woodhall Park Nursing Home Good, 1.3 miles away
  3. RI
    The Grange Residential Care Home Requires improvement, 1.5 miles away
  4. G
    The Old Vicarage Good, 1.5 miles away
  5. G
    Sawley Good, 1.6 miles away

See all care homes in Derbyshire

See all care homes in Long Eaton

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 3 April 2025 (assessment visit 21 February 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment: 27 February to 6 March 2025. The Firs Residential Home is a care home providing regulated activity to people over the age of 65, people living with dementia and people who have mental health conditions. There were 21 people using the service at the time of our assessment. This assessment was carried out following information of concern we had received about the quality of the care in the service. We found 2 breaches of the legal regulations in relation to safe care and treatment and good governance. We found no evidence that people had been harmed, however, systems were either not in place or robust enough to demonstrate governance was effectively managed. We found medicines were not always managed safely in the service as records relating to the administration of people’s medicines were not fully completed and fridge and room temperature records contained gaps in the recording, this was not in line with best practice or the providers policy. We also found some areas of the environment had not been well maintained, hazards we identified had not been assessed or mitigated prior to the provider’s refurbishment plan for the service commencing. The service lacked effective systems and processes to aid the management oversight, audits which had been completed did not identify or action the issues we found. People’s care plans and risk assessments had been fully completed, and appropriate referrals were made to support people with any changes in their needs. Staff were recruited safely and had received training appropriate for their roles. People, relatives and staff all had opportunity to feedback on their experience of the service and we found the provider worked with people and staff to provide an inclusive and fair culture. We have asked the provider for an action plan in response to the concerns found at this assessment.

  • Safe No rating
  • Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary
  1. Safe

    No rating

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has remained requires improvement. This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed. The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to the ways people’s medicines were managed.

  2. Well-led

    No rating

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care. The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to governance at the service.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 3 April 2025. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 3 April 2025. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
  3. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.

Registration details

Registered manager
Josie Wilson
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Mental Health, Older People, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

7 inspection reports, latest 5 June 2019. Latest assessment published 3 April 2025; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
05323590 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Derbyshire County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does The Firs Residential Home provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists The Firs Residential Home as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does The Firs Residential Home have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 28 beds at The Firs Residential Home.
When was The Firs Residential Home last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for The Firs Residential Home was published on 3 April 2025.
Who runs The Firs Residential Home?
The Firs Residential Home is run by The Firs Care Home Limited.
What is The Firs Residential Home's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 3 April 2025.

Contact

Phone
01332 872535
Address
9 Stevens Lane, Breaston, Derby, DE72 3BU Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Alexandra Care Home (Good, 1.2 miles away) and Woodhall Park Nursing Home (Good, 1.3 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    Alexandra Care Home Good, 1.2 miles away
  2. G
    Woodhall Park Nursing Home Good, 1.3 miles away
  3. RI
    The Grange Residential Care Home Requires improvement, 1.5 miles away
  4. G
    The Old Vicarage Good, 1.5 miles away
  5. G
    Sawley Good, 1.6 miles away

See all care homes in Derbyshire

See all care homes in Long Eaton