Tunstall Hall Care Centre
- Care home
- 33 beds
- No nursing
- Dementia care
- Registered since 2010
- Market Drayton, Shropshire, West Midlands
Requires improvement
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
At a glance
4 ratings
First rated Good in 2016, most recently Requires improvement in July 2025.
15 months
since the latest rating was published.
18 of 101
rated care homes in Shropshire are rated Requires improvement, like this one.
Tunstall Hall Care Centre: inspection record
Rated Requires improvement in July 2025.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Compare nearby
Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Bradbury Court (Good, 1.3 miles away) and Woodcroft (Outstanding, 1.7 miles away).
Nearest care homes:
- RI Maer Lane Requires improvement, 1.2 miles away
- G Bradbury Court Good, 1.3 miles away
- O Woodcroft Outstanding, 1.7 miles away
- G Cheswardine Hall Nursing & Residential Home Good, 3.5 miles away
- – Shropshire Respite Centre Not yet rated, 4.1 miles away
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 18 July 2025 (assessment visit 27 February 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
Date of Assessment: 27 February 2025 to 19 May 2025
The assessment was in response to concerns received regarding staff training around dementia care and how the provider supported people living with dementia.
- Safe No rating
- Caring No rating
- Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary
The service is a residential care home providing personal care and support to older people some of whom were living with dementia.
The provider was previously in breach of the legal regulation in relation to governance. Improvements were not found at this assessment, and the provider remained in breach of this regulation.
Risk assessments were in place but risks to people were not always managed safely, particularly in relation to their nutrition and fluid intake. Safeguarding referrals and CQC notifications had not always been submitted when needed which meant relevant agencies were not always aware of risk in the home. People’s medicines were not always stored safely and we found some discrepancies with the recording of medicine administration.
People were not always referred to in a dignified way in care plans and in the way staff spoke about them. Staff told us they had observed some colleagues speak with people in a way that was not always kind and caring.
The culture in the home was not always person-centred. Whilst people were supported by a sufficient number of staff to meet their needs, practices at the home did not always ensure people’s needs were met at a time of their choice. Some practices such as the way in which meals and drinks were served were task-centred and did not always meet people’s individual needs. Staff told us the morale at the home was poor and they did not always feel they were treated equally. Staff were not always confident concerns would be addressed by management which made them reluctant to raise them.
Quality systems were not always effective in checking the quality of the home and identifying concerns so action could be taken to address them.
Whilst the provider was proactive in addressing concerns raised during the assessment process, they had failed to act on all the concerns raised at the last inspection such as in relation to medicines storage.
Despite the concerns we found, relatives provided positive feedback about the home and were confident people were safe living at the home. The home was clean, and staff wore Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) as required.
People were supported by a sufficient number of staff to meet their needs although some practices in the home meant their needs were not met at a time of their choice. Staff were safely recruited and supervisions were held with them to check their competence. Referrals were made to other health professionals when needed to meet their needs safely.
People were supported to maintain their independence and engage in activities inside and outside of the home.
Dementia training was undertaken during the assessment process to improve staff knowledge regarding how to meet people’s needs safely and more effectively. Professionals told us there had been an improvement in the provider’s engagement with them.
-
Safe
No rating
Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has remained requires improvement.
This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed.
-
Caring
No rating
Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant people were not always well-supported, cared for or treated with dignity and respect.
-
Well-led
No rating
Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.
At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has remained requires improvement.
This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care.
The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to the leadership and governance at the home. We have asked the provider for an action plan in response to the concerns found at this assessment.
Questions to ask when you visit
- Safe was rated Requires improvement on 18 July 2025. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
- Caring was rated Requires improvement on 18 July 2025. Ask how staff protect dignity and how residents are involved in decisions about their care.
- Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 18 July 2025. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
Registration details
- Registered manager
- Lesley Smith
- Registered with the CQC since
- What it provides
- Care home service without nursing
- Who it supports
- Dementia, Older People
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)7 inspection reports, latest 10 September 2022. Latest assessment published 18 July 2025; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.
The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
- Provider
- St Philips Care LimitedBrand: St Philips Care
- Ownership type
- Organisation
- Companies House number
- 03298131 (opens Companies House)
St Philips Care Limited runs 21 services in England, 2 of them in the West Midlands. 17 are rated Good or Outstanding and 4 are rated Requires improvement or Inadequate.
Other services run by St Philips Care Limited
- G Barrow Hall Care Centre Good. Care home with nursing, North Lincolnshire, Yorkshire and the Humber
- G Bowburn Care Centre Good. Care home, County Durham, North East
- G Burntwood Hall Care Centre Good. Care home, Barnsley, Yorkshire and the Humber
- G Canwick Court Care Centre Good. Care home, Lincolnshire, East Midlands
Getting help from Shropshire Council
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at Shropshire Council
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 0345 678 9044, Monday to Thursday, 8.45am to 5pm, Friday, 8.45am to 4pm
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: Shropshire Council
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does Tunstall Hall Care Centre provide nursing care?
- No. The Care Quality Commission lists Tunstall Hall Care Centre as a care home without nursing.
- How many beds does Tunstall Hall Care Centre have?
- The Care Quality Commission's register lists 33 beds at Tunstall Hall Care Centre.
- When was Tunstall Hall Care Centre last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Tunstall Hall Care Centre was published on 18 July 2025.
- Who runs Tunstall Hall Care Centre?
- Tunstall Hall Care Centre is run by St Philips Care Limited. It runs 21 services in England, 2 of them in the West Midlands.
- What is Tunstall Hall Care Centre's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 18 July 2025.
Contact
- Phone
- 01630 652774
- Address
- Tunstall Hall, Newcastle Road, Market Drayton, TF9 4AA Map (opens Google Maps)
Compare nearby
Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Bradbury Court (Good, 1.3 miles away) and Woodcroft (Outstanding, 1.7 miles away).
Nearest care homes:
- RI Maer Lane Requires improvement, 1.2 miles away
- G Bradbury Court Good, 1.3 miles away
- O Woodcroft Outstanding, 1.7 miles away
- G Cheswardine Hall Nursing & Residential Home Good, 3.5 miles away
- – Shropshire Respite Centre Not yet rated, 4.1 miles away