Rated Care Homes

Cornerways

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 2 ratings

    Rated Good at every inspection since 2016.

  • 7 years

    since the latest rating was published. A rating this old may not show how the service is today.

  • 34 of 41

    rated care homes in Wokingham are rated Good, like this one.

Cornerways: inspection record

Care home, 8 beds, Wokingham

Rated Good in July 2019.

Cornerways: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Abbeyfield Winnersh Good, 0.6 miles away
  2. G
  3. RI
    Austen House Requires improvement, 1.3 miles away
  4. G
    Beech House Good, 1.6 miles away
  5. G
    Loddon Court Good, 1.7 miles away

See all care homes in Wokingham

About the service

From the Care Quality Commission's inspection report published 10 July 2019. Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Cornerways is a care home without nursing registered to provide care for up to eight people who may have learning disabilities, behaviour that may challenge, physical disabilities, mental health needs and/or autistic spectrum conditions. At the time of our inspection there were eight people living at the service.

Read the rest of CQC's summary

The service has been developed and designed in line with the principles and values that underpin Registering the Right Support and other best practice guidance. This ensures that people who use the service can live as full a life as possible and achieve the best possible outcomes. The principles reflect the need for people with learning disabilities and/or autism to live meaningful lives that include control, choice, and independence. People using the service receive planned and co-ordinated person-centred support that is appropriate and inclusive for them.

What inspectors found

The service applied the principles and values of Registering the Right Support and other best practice guidance. These ensure that people who use the service can live as full a life as possible and achieve the best possible outcomes that include control, choice and independence.

Read the rest of CQC's summary

The outcomes for people using the service reflected the principles and values of Registering the Right Support by promoting choice and control, independence and inclusion. People's support focused on them having as many opportunities as possible for them to gain new skills and become more independent.

We have recommended that future ongoing staff training be updated in line with the latest best practice guidelines for social care staff.

People felt safe living at the service. Relatives felt their family members were kept safe in the service. The registered manager and staff understood their responsibilities to raise concerns and report incidents or allegations of abuse. Risks to people's personal safety had been assessed and plans were in place to minimise those risks.

Staff recruitment and staffing levels supported people to stay safe while working towards their goals and going about their lives. The management of medicines was safe, and people received their prescribed medicine on time. There were contingency plans in place to respond to emergencies. The premises and equipment were cleaned and well maintained.

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

People received effective care and support from staff who knew them well. The registered manager had planned and booked training to ensure staff had appropriate knowledge to support people. People enjoyed

the food and could choose what they ate and where to eat. People had their healthcare needs identified and were able to access healthcare professionals such as their GP.

We observed kind and friendly interactions between staff and people. People confirmed staff respected their privacy and dignity. The registered manager was working with the staff team to ensure caring and kind support was consistent. People and their families were involved in the planning of their care.

The registered manager encouraged feedback from people and families, which they used to make improvements to the service and protected against the risks of receiving unsafe and inappropriate care and treatment. The staff team recognised and responded to changes in risks to people and ensured a timely response and appropriate action was taken. People were encouraged to live a fulfilled life with activities of their choosing and were supported to keep in contact with their families.

The registered manager had quality assurance systems in place to monitor the running of the service, the quality of the service being delivered and took actions promptly to address any issues. The registered manager appreciated staff's contribution to ensure people received the best care and support. Staff felt the registered manager was supportive and open with them and communicated what was happening at the service and with the people living there. People and relatives felt the service was managed well and that they could approach the management and staff with any concerns.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. The last rating is 7 years old. Ask what has changed since then.
  2. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  3. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Ligia-Camelia Birt
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

6 inspection reports, latest 10 July 2019. The reports are on the Care Quality Commission website.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
Voyage 1 LimitedBrand: Voyage
Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
02215899 (opens Companies House)

Voyage 1 Limited runs 278 services in England, 76 of them in the South East. 239 are rated Good or Outstanding, 24 are rated Requires improvement or Inadequate and 15 have no rating yet.

Other services run by Voyage 1 Limited

  1. O
    1 Sheringham Avenue Outstanding. Care home, Enfield, London
  2. O
    23 Cecil Road Outstanding. Care home, Derbyshire, East Midlands
  3. O
    4 Pages Orchard Outstanding. Care home, Oxfordshire
  4. O
    Bewick House Outstanding. Care home, Darlington, North East

See all 278 services run by Voyage 1 Limited

Getting help from Wokingham Borough Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Cornerways provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Cornerways as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Cornerways have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 8 beds at Cornerways.
When was Cornerways last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Cornerways was published on 10 July 2019.
Who runs Cornerways?
Cornerways is run by Voyage 1 Limited. It runs 278 services in England, 76 of them in the South East.
What is Cornerways's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 10 July 2019.

Contact

Address
32 Arbor Lane, Winnersh, Wokingham, RG41 5JD Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Abbeyfield Winnersh Good, 0.6 miles away
  2. G
  3. RI
    Austen House Requires improvement, 1.3 miles away
  4. G
    Beech House Good, 1.6 miles away
  5. G
    Loddon Court Good, 1.7 miles away

See all care homes in Wokingham