Rated Care Homes

Rivers

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 3 ratings

    Rated Good at every inspection since 2015.

  • 7 years

    since the latest rating was published. A rating this old may not show how the service is today.

  • 186 of 249

    rated care homes in Nottinghamshire are rated Good, like this one.

Rivers: inspection record

Care home, 6 beds, Nottinghamshire

Rated Good in February 2020.

Rivers: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Langold View Good, 0.7 miles away
  2. G
    Rose Farm Good, 1.5 miles away
  3. RI
    Brailsford House Requires improvement, 2.4 miles away
  4. G
    Blyth Country House Care Home Good, 2.8 miles away
  5. G
    Rock House Residential Home Good, 3.1 miles away

See all care homes in Nottinghamshire

See all care homes in Harworth

About the service

From the Care Quality Commission's inspection report published 27 February 2020. Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Rivers is a residential care home providing personal or nursing care for people who have mental health needs, learning disabilities or autistic spectrum support needs. The care home is an adapted residential building, and there were 6 people receiving a service at the time of the inspection.

Read the rest of CQC's summary

The service has been developed and designed in line with the principles and values that underpin Registering the Right Support and other best practice guidance. This ensures that people who use the service can live as full a life as possible and achieve the best possible outcomes. The principles reflect the need for people with learning disabilities and/or autism to live meaningful lives that include control, choice, and independence. People using the service receive planned and co-ordinated person-centred support that is appropriate and inclusive for them.

The service was registered for the support of up to 6 people; and the building design was similar to neighbouring large domestic homes. There were deliberately no identifying signs or anything else outside to indicate it was a care home. Staff were also discouraged from wearing anything that suggested they were care staff when coming and going with people.

What inspectors found

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and usually in their best interests; the systems in the service supported this practice, although the provider's policy on transport costs did not. People's best interests were not always identified by the provider; and best interest decision processes were not always in place. For example, there was no evidence that people had given their consent to pay travel charges decided by the provider. The registered manager told us they were supporting people to have the charges reviewed. Following the inspection, the provider told us they intended to review their transport cost recovery policy.

Read the rest of CQC's summary

People received support to meet their assessed personal care and development needs; from staff who were well trained and supported by the provider. People were involved in choosing and cooking food they liked, and meal times were social occasions. The care home environment met people's housing needs; and the staff team linked with external agencies to ensure people received the care and health support they needed.

People were kept safe by the provider's procedures and by staff who understood how to protect people from potential abuse. Risks were assessed, and action taken to reduce them when necessary. Staff had background checks carried out when they were recruited, so the provider could be assured of their suitability to support vulnerable people. Medicines were safely managed, and the care home was clean and homely. When incidents happened, the registered manager reviewed them and identified any lessons that could be learned to reduce the chance of recurrence.

Staff supported people with kindness and respect; and people told us they liked the staff. People were involved in making decisions about how their care was provided, and the team supported people to raise issues about things they were unhappy about. Privacy and dignity was respected at all times.

People's support was individualised, and they had access to varied activities of their choice. People's communication needs were met by staff who took the time to explain things to them. Important family links were supported and maintained, and the service had received no formal complaints since the previous inspection.

The service had a positive atmosphere and people were supported to achieve their longer-term goals through a series of planned smaller steps. The registered manager understood how to deal with incidents in an open and transparent way and ensured the necessary notifications to other agencies had been made. The support team understood their roles and were committed to providing a high-quality service for people. The registered manager was linked into other agencies and forums, so they could keep up to date and continue to learn about how services can continue to improve.

The service applied the principles and values of Registering the Right Support and other best practice guidance. These ensure that people who use the service can live as full a life as possible and achieve the best possible outcomes that include control, choice and independence.

The outcomes for people using the service reflected the principles and values of Registering the Right Support by promoting choice and control, independence and inclusion. People's support focused on them having as many opportunities as possible for them to gain new skills and become more independent.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Effective was rated Requires improvement on 27 February 2020. Ask about staff training and how health appointments are arranged.
  2. The last rating is 7 years old. Ask what has changed since then.
  3. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.

Registration details

Registered manager
Christopher Hogben
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Mental Health, Physical Disability, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

5 inspection reports, latest 27 February 2020. The reports are on the Care Quality Commission website.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
Voyage 1 LimitedBrand: Voyage
Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
02215899 (opens Companies House)

Voyage 1 Limited runs 278 services in England, 33 of them in the East Midlands. 239 are rated Good or Outstanding, 24 are rated Requires improvement or Inadequate and 15 have no rating yet.

Other services run by Voyage 1 Limited

  1. O
    1 Sheringham Avenue Outstanding. Care home, Enfield, London
  2. O
    23 Cecil Road Outstanding. Care home, Derbyshire
  3. O
    4 Pages Orchard Outstanding. Care home, Oxfordshire, South East
  4. O
    Bewick House Outstanding. Care home, Darlington, North East

See all 278 services run by Voyage 1 Limited

Getting help from Nottinghamshire County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Rivers provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Rivers as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Rivers have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 6 beds at Rivers.
When was Rivers last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Rivers was published on 27 February 2020.
Who runs Rivers?
Rivers is run by Voyage 1 Limited. It runs 278 services in England, 33 of them in the East Midlands.
What is Rivers's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 27 February 2020.

Contact

Phone
01909 731429
Address
Blyth Road, Oldcotes, Worksop, S81 8HU Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Langold View Good, 0.7 miles away
  2. G
    Rose Farm Good, 1.5 miles away
  3. RI
    Brailsford House Requires improvement, 2.4 miles away
  4. G
    Blyth Country House Care Home Good, 2.8 miles away
  5. G
    Rock House Residential Home Good, 3.1 miles away

See all care homes in Nottinghamshire

See all care homes in Harworth