Rated Care Homes

Wyndham Manor Care Home

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 5 ratings

    Its last inspection moved it down from Good to Requires improvement.

  • 16 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 16 of 78

    rated care homes in Cumberland are rated Requires improvement, like this one.

Wyndham Manor Care Home: inspection record

Care home, 68 beds, Cumberland

Rated Requires improvement in June 2025, down from Good.

Wyndham Manor Care Home: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Floshfield (Good, 0.8 miles away) and Bethshan Nursing Home Limited (Good, 2.1 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    Floshfield Good, 0.8 miles away
  2. G
    Bethshan Nursing Home Limited Good, 2.1 miles away
  3. RI
    The Gables Requires improvement, 2.2 miles away
  4. G
  5. G
    Highfield House Good, 2.7 miles away

See all care homes in Cumberland

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 26 June 2025 (assessment visit 5 April 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment: 16 April 2024 – 29 May 2025.

Wyndham Manor is a care home providing personal care and accommodation for up to 68 people. At the time of the inspection there were 40 people living in the home, some of whom were living with dementia.

  • Safe No rating
  • Effective No rating
  • Caring No rating
  • Responsive No rating
  • Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary

We carried out the assessment because we had received concerns from the local authority and the provider themselves about people’s care and the management of the home. We found a breach of the legal regulation in relation to good governance.

We identified shortfalls in relation to record keeping and the management of medicines, nutrition and continence care. Lessons learned in relation to accidents and incidents, safeguarding allegations and complaints had not always been identified, analysed and shared with staff.

An effective system was not fully in place to ensure staff were trained and supported. Prior to our assessment, supervision and appraisal meetings had not been carried out as planned, and where they had been carried out, issues identified had not always been followed up. There were gaps and shortfalls in staff knowledge and skills in relation to areas such as catheter care, the Mental Capacity Act (2005) (MCA) and nutrition.

The provider had already identified many of the issues we found. They had introduced new recording and monitoring systems as well as a new electronic care management system. It was not possible to check how effective these new systems were, since they had just been introduced and were not yet embedded into practice. Training was being organised and a new supervision and appraisal planner had been implemented.

The registered manager was on leave at the time of our inspection. The deputy manager was providing management cover with support from the senior management team. The provider was strengthening management systems at the home and was recruiting an additional deputy manager.

Prior to our assessment, the provider had put a voluntary suspension on admissions to the home to allow improvements to be made and ensure people’s safety. The provider had contacted the local authority commissioning team about the voluntary suspension. The home is being supported by the local authority’s 'Quality Improvement Process' to implement the changes the provider had identified.

We will request an action plan and meet with the provider following this report being published to discuss how they will make changes to ensure they improve their rating to at least good.

  1. Safe

    No rating

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    At our last inspection we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed.

  2. Effective

    No rating

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last inspection we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant the effectiveness of people’s care, treatment and support did not always achieve good outcomes or was inconsistent.

  3. Caring

    No rating

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant people did not always feel well-supported, cared for or treated with dignity and respect.

  4. Responsive

    No rating

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last inspection we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant people’s needs were not always met.

  5. Well-led

    No rating

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last inspection we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care.

    The service was in breach of the legal regulation in relation to good governance.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 26 June 2025. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Effective was rated Requires improvement on 26 June 2025. Ask about staff training and how health appointments are arranged.
  3. Caring was rated Requires improvement on 26 June 2025. Ask how staff protect dignity and how residents are involved in decisions about their care.
  4. Responsive was rated Requires improvement on 26 June 2025. Ask to see how care plans are kept up to date, how complaints are handled and what activities are on offer.

Registration details

Registered manager
Susan Edwards
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

13 inspection reports, latest 2 March 2022. Latest assessment published 26 June 2025; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
06294700 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Cumberland Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Wyndham Manor Care Home provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Wyndham Manor Care Home as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Wyndham Manor Care Home have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 68 beds at Wyndham Manor Care Home.
When was Wyndham Manor Care Home last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Wyndham Manor Care Home was published on 26 June 2025.
Who runs Wyndham Manor Care Home?
Wyndham Manor Care Home is run by Wyndham Court Limited.
What is Wyndham Manor Care Home's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 26 June 2025.

Contact

Phone
01946 810020
Address
Wyndham Street, Cleator Moor, CA25 5AN Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Floshfield (Good, 0.8 miles away) and Bethshan Nursing Home Limited (Good, 2.1 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    Floshfield Good, 0.8 miles away
  2. G
    Bethshan Nursing Home Limited Good, 2.1 miles away
  3. RI
    The Gables Requires improvement, 2.2 miles away
  4. G
  5. G
    Highfield House Good, 2.7 miles away

See all care homes in Cumberland