Wood Hill Lodge
- Care home
- 99 beds
- Nursing care
- Dementia care
- Registered since 2022
- Central Sheffield, Sheffield, Yorkshire and the Humber
Good
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
At a glance
2 ratings
Its last inspection improved it from Inadequate to Good.
8 months
since the latest rating was published.
87 of 107
rated care homes in Sheffield are rated Good, like this one.
Wood Hill Lodge: inspection record
Rated Good in February 2026, up from Inadequate.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Compare nearby
- RI Neu Living Requires improvement, less than 0.1 miles away
- RI Wood Hill Grange Requires improvement, less than 0.1 miles away
- G Pexton Grange Good, 0.3 miles away
- RI Norbury Court Requires improvement, 0.4 miles away
- G Loxley Court Good, 0.4 miles away
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 3 February 2026 (assessment visit 14 May 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
Date of Assessment: 25 November to 18 December 2025. The service is a care home providing personal and nursing care to people with mental health conditions, physical disabilities and people living with dementia. The service is divided into several units and can support up to 99 people. At the time of our assessment 59 people were using the service. Some units were closed at the time of our assessment.
- Safe No rating
- Effective Good
- Caring Good
- Responsive Good
- Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary
We carried out an assessment looking at all quality statements to be able to provide an overall rating as the service is not rated. We had carried out a focused assessment in May 2024 and looked at safe and well led, which are currently rated requires improvement. Our decision to inspect the service was to determine if improvements had been made and to give an overall rating.
People were protected and kept safe. There were enough staff with the right skills, qualifications and experience and staff received training and support to maintain good quality care. Staff managed medicines and people received their medicines safely. However, we identified some issues, which were addressed immediately by the provider. People's needs were assessed and care and treatment was delivered in line with people's needs. Care delivery we observed was predominantly person-centred. Care plans were regularly reviewed, and people were referred to local healthcare services as required. Staff followed clinical guidance for people’s care and support. The registered manager had the skills, knowledge, and experience to lead effectively, they did so with openness and honesty. The service had a good learning culture and people could raise concerns. We identified some concerns with the environment, which the provider assured us was being improved. Following our site visit works commenced to address this. Governance had improved, and the provider was continually looking at ways to further improve systems. However, the systems needed embedding into practice and sustaining.
-
Safe
No rating
Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has remained requires improvement. This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed.
-
Effective
Good
Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. This is the first assessment of this key question under the new provider. This key question has been rated good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.
-
Caring
Good
Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. This is the first assessment of this key question under the new provider. This key question has been rated good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.
-
Responsive
Good
Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.At our last assessment we rated this key question good. This is the first assessment of this key question under the new provider. This key question has been rated good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.
-
Well-led
Good
Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.
Questions to ask when you visit
- Safe was rated Requires improvement on 3 February 2026. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
- Ask how nursing cover works at night and at weekends.
- Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
Registration details
- Registered manager
- Bose Ogunbiyi
- Registered with the CQC since
- What it provides
- Care home service with nursing
- Who it supports
- Dementia, Mental Health, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)2 inspection reports, latest 2 December 2023. Latest assessment published 3 February 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.
The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
- Provider
- Portland Care 4 LimitedBrand: Portland Care Sheffield Limited
- Ownership type
- Organisation
- Companies House number
- 13919768 (opens Companies House)
Getting help from Sheffield City Council
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at Sheffield City Council
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 0114 273 4908
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: Sheffield City Council
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does Wood Hill Lodge provide nursing care?
- Yes. The Care Quality Commission lists Wood Hill Lodge as a care home with nursing.
- How many beds does Wood Hill Lodge have?
- The Care Quality Commission's register lists 99 beds at Wood Hill Lodge.
- When was Wood Hill Lodge last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Wood Hill Lodge was published on 3 February 2026.
- Who runs Wood Hill Lodge?
- Wood Hill Lodge is run by Portland Care 4 Limited.
- What is Wood Hill Lodge's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 3 February 2026.
Contact
- Phone
- 0114 395 2093
- Address
- 522 Grimesthorpe Road, Sheffield, S4 8LE Map (opens Google Maps)
Compare nearby
- RI Neu Living Requires improvement, less than 0.1 miles away
- RI Wood Hill Grange Requires improvement, less than 0.1 miles away
- G Pexton Grange Good, 0.3 miles away
- RI Norbury Court Requires improvement, 0.4 miles away
- G Loxley Court Good, 0.4 miles away