The Close
- Care home
- 30 beds
- No nursing
- Dementia care
- Registered since 2010
- Heacham, Norfolk, East of England
Good
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
At a glance
6 ratings
Its last inspection improved it from Requires improvement to Good.
12 months
since the latest rating was published.
173 of 288
rated care homes in Norfolk are rated Good, like this one.
The Close: inspection record
Rated Good in October 2025, up from Requires improvement.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Compare nearby
- G Phoenix House Good, 0.1 miles away
- G Summerville House Good, 1.7 miles away
- G Rebecca Court Good, 2 miles away
- G The Gables Residential Home Good, 2.2 miles away
- G Millbridge Care Home Good, 2.3 miles away
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 16 October 2025 (assessment visit 3 September 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
Date of assessment: 17 to 29 September 2025. The Close is a care home providing accommodation and personal care for older people and people living with dementia. The service is registered to accommodate up to 30 people. At the time of our assessment 27 people were living in the service.
- Safe Good
- Effective Good
- Caring Good
- Responsive Good
- Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary
At the last inspection in January 2022, we rated the home as requires improvement and the home was in breach of regulation in relation to safe care and treatment. At this inspection we found the service had made improvements and were no longer in breach. The service’s rating has changed to good.
We identified areas that needed improvement within the environment. Some pipes needed to be covered to prevent scalding, not all equipment was appropriately inspected and improvements were needed to the in-house maintenance water testing. We raised these concerns with the provider and throughout our assessment these issues were acted upon and resolved.
We received mixed feedback from staff. Most felt they needed an increase in staffing numbers to meet people’s needs more safely. We raised this with the provider, and they reviewed and increased their staffing levels and were collaborating with the staff to see where the requirements were needed. We found staff had not received training on the international dysphagia diet initiative (IDDSI) when people living in the service required IDDSI levels to mitigate their risk of choking and maintain a nutritious diet. However, staff had received support and guidance from speech and language therapy (SALT) team to mitigate this risk and the provider arranged training to commence imminently.
We found the service’s policies and procedures were not always clear and accurate for staff to follow. We addressed this with the provider, and they rectified some policies and had a plan to address the remaining ones. Throughout our assessment the provider was transitioning over to an electronic care planning software and this continued alongside the provider addressing the issues we had identified.
We received positive feedback from people in the service and their relatives. There was a good working relationship with healthcare professionals that visited the service. This meant peoples care and supports needs were monitored and managed to ensure they received safe care and treatment. Referrals were submitted promptly, and guidance was being followed and embedded within peoples care records.
-
Safe
Good
Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.
At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment, the rating has changed to good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.
-
Effective
Good
Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment, and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.
At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment, the rating has changed to good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.
-
Caring
Good
Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity, and respect.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment, the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.
-
Responsive
Good
Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.
At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment, the rating has changed to good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.
-
Well-led
No rating
Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.
At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment, the rating has remained requires improvement. This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care.
Questions to ask when you visit
- Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 16 October 2025. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
- Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
- Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.
Registration details
- Registered manager
- Vilasini Pethiyagoda
- Registered with the CQC since
- What it provides
- Care home service without nursing
- Who it supports
- Dementia, Older People
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)8 inspection reports, latest 23 March 2022. Latest assessment published 16 October 2025; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.
The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
- Provider
- Norfolk Care Limited
- Ownership type
- Organisation
- Companies House number
- 05358284 (opens Companies House)
Getting help from Norfolk County Council
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at Norfolk County Council
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 0344 800 8020, Monday to Friday, 9am to 5pm
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: Norfolk County Council
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does The Close provide nursing care?
- No. The Care Quality Commission lists The Close as a care home without nursing.
- How many beds does The Close have?
- The Care Quality Commission's register lists 30 beds at The Close.
- When was The Close last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for The Close was published on 16 October 2025.
- Who runs The Close?
- The Close is run by Norfolk Care Limited.
- What is The Close's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 16 October 2025.
Contact
- Phone
- 01485 540041
- Address
- The Close Residential Home, 53 Lynn Road, Snettisham, Kings Lynn, PE31 7PT Map (opens Google Maps)
Compare nearby
- G Phoenix House Good, 0.1 miles away
- G Summerville House Good, 1.7 miles away
- G Rebecca Court Good, 2 miles away
- G The Gables Residential Home Good, 2.2 miles away
- G Millbridge Care Home Good, 2.3 miles away