Rated Care Homes

The Close

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 6 ratings

    Its last inspection improved it from Requires improvement to Good.

  • 12 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 173 of 288

    rated care homes in Norfolk are rated Good, like this one.

The Close: inspection record

Care home, 30 beds, Norfolk

Rated Good in October 2025, up from Requires improvement.

The Close: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Phoenix House Good, 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Summerville House Good, 1.7 miles away
  3. G
    Rebecca Court Good, 2 miles away
  4. G
    The Gables Residential Home Good, 2.2 miles away
  5. G
    Millbridge Care Home Good, 2.3 miles away

See all care homes in Norfolk

See all care homes in Heacham

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 16 October 2025 (assessment visit 3 September 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment: 17 to 29 September 2025. The Close is a care home providing accommodation and personal care for older people and people living with dementia. The service is registered to accommodate up to 30 people. At the time of our assessment 27 people were living in the service.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary

At the last inspection in January 2022, we rated the home as requires improvement and the home was in breach of regulation in relation to safe care and treatment. At this inspection we found the service had made improvements and were no longer in breach. The service’s rating has changed to good.

We identified areas that needed improvement within the environment. Some pipes needed to be covered to prevent scalding, not all equipment was appropriately inspected and improvements were needed to the in-house maintenance water testing. We raised these concerns with the provider and throughout our assessment these issues were acted upon and resolved.

We received mixed feedback from staff. Most felt they needed an increase in staffing numbers to meet people’s needs more safely. We raised this with the provider, and they reviewed and increased their staffing levels and were collaborating with the staff to see where the requirements were needed. We found staff had not received training on the international dysphagia diet initiative (IDDSI) when people living in the service required IDDSI levels to mitigate their risk of choking and maintain a nutritious diet. However, staff had received support and guidance from speech and language therapy (SALT) team to mitigate this risk and the provider arranged training to commence imminently.

We found the service’s policies and procedures were not always clear and accurate for staff to follow. We addressed this with the provider, and they rectified some policies and had a plan to address the remaining ones. Throughout our assessment the provider was transitioning over to an electronic care planning software and this continued alongside the provider addressing the issues we had identified.

We received positive feedback from people in the service and their relatives. There was a good working relationship with healthcare professionals that visited the service. This meant peoples care and supports needs were monitored and managed to ensure they received safe care and treatment. Referrals were submitted promptly, and guidance was being followed and embedded within peoples care records.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment, the rating has changed to good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment, and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment, the rating has changed to good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity, and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment, the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment, the rating has changed to good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    No rating

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment, the rating has remained requires improvement. This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 16 October 2025. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
  2. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  3. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Vilasini Pethiyagoda
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

8 inspection reports, latest 23 March 2022. Latest assessment published 16 October 2025; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
05358284 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Norfolk County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does The Close provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists The Close as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does The Close have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 30 beds at The Close.
When was The Close last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for The Close was published on 16 October 2025.
Who runs The Close?
The Close is run by Norfolk Care Limited.
What is The Close's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 16 October 2025.

Contact

Phone
01485 540041
Address
The Close Residential Home, 53 Lynn Road, Snettisham, Kings Lynn, PE31 7PT Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Phoenix House Good, 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Summerville House Good, 1.7 miles away
  3. G
    Rebecca Court Good, 2 miles away
  4. G
    The Gables Residential Home Good, 2.2 miles away
  5. G
    Millbridge Care Home Good, 2.3 miles away

See all care homes in Norfolk

See all care homes in Heacham