Rated Care Homes

Frinton House

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 4 ratings

    First rated Inadequate in 2016, most recently Good in April 2026.

  • 6 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 214 of 258

    rated care homes in East Sussex are rated Good, like this one.

Frinton House: inspection record

Care home, 7 beds, East Sussex

Rated Good in April 2026.

Frinton House: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Lucerne House Good, 0.2 miles away
  2. G
    Jubilee Court Good, 0.2 miles away
  3. G
    Summer Wood Residential Care Home Good, 0.2 miles away
  4. RI
    Arden House Residential Care Home Requires improvement, 0.2 miles away
  5. G
    St Nectans Residential Care Home Good, 0.2 miles away

See all care homes in East Sussex

See all care homes in Bexhill-on-Sea

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 27 April 2026 (assessment visit 20 February 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment 26 February to 2 March 2026. The assessment was carried out due to the age of the current rating. Frinton House is a residential care home providing accommodation for up to 7 autistic people or people living with a learning disability who required support with personal care. There was a mixture of male and female residents that covered an age range from 18 to 65. There were 7 people living at the home at the time of our assessment.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Outstanding
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

We assessed the service against the principles of ‘Right Support, Right Care, Right Culture.’ This framework provides guidance about whether the registered manager guaranteed that people living with a learning disability or autistic people were treated with respect, dignity, equality and were given choices. It also ensures people lived as independently as possible and had access to the local community. The registered manager understood these principles fully and they were embedded within the culture of the home.

People were treated with exceptional kindness and received daily 1 to 1 support that empowered them to live the lives they wanted to and to achieve their goals. Maintaining people’s dignity was engrained into the ethos of the home. We observed many interactions between staff and people and in all cases, staff were attentive without being intrusive and supportive without being restrictive. This was reflected in the way people presented to us as visitors. People were consistently happy, smiling and wanting to engage and share their experiences with us. People’s independence was promoted in all aspects of their lives from achieving daily tasks to realising longer term ambitions for example, attending college, volunteering and going abroad on holiday.

People lived safely at the home free from avoidable harm and supported by a staffing team that knew them well and who were appropriately trained in all key areas. The management of risk was exceptional. People were able to mobilise around the home freely with minimal and non-intrusive support from staff. The environment had been adapted to meet people’s needs, was clean and decorated according to people’s wishes. Infection control and medicines were managed well.

People had their needs assessed before moving to the homeand this was done with people, their loved ones and professionals involved in their care. People’s nutrition and hydration needs were met, and staff had a good understanding of consent and supporting people safely.

Care was person centred. All care plans and the consequent support provided by staff was tailored and focussed on individuals. People were able to express their views about the home and people and relatives knew how to complain or raise issues if needed.

The registered manager’s vision and focus every year was to enhance the lives of the people they supported. The culture at the home was one of improving people’s lives, supporting the person and placing any disabilities as secondary to the person themselves. It was clear how this attitude had impacted on people with all their lives improving each year with the support of the registered manager and whole staffing team. Staff were able to raise issues as needed and there was a robust governance system in place.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good.

    This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good.

    This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Outstanding

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to outstanding.

    This meant people were truly respected and valued as individuals; and empowered as partners in their care in an exceptional service.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good.

    This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good.

    This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  2. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Emily Ruiz
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

7 inspection reports, latest 1 June 2018. Latest assessment published 27 April 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
04081379 (opens Companies House)

Consensus Support Services Limited runs 59 services in England, 11 of them in the South East. 53 are rated Good or Outstanding, 3 are rated Requires improvement or Inadequate and 3 have no rating yet.

Other services run by Consensus Support Services Limited

  1. O
    Cheshire House Outstanding. Care home, Trafford, North West
  2. O
    Haydock House Outstanding. Care home, North Northamptonshire, East Midlands
  3. O
    Heatherington House Outstanding. Care home, North Northamptonshire, East Midlands
  4. O
    Holland House Outstanding. Care home, North Northamptonshire, East Midlands

See all 59 services run by Consensus Support Services Limited

Getting help from East Sussex County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Frinton House provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Frinton House as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Frinton House have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 7 beds at Frinton House.
When was Frinton House last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Frinton House was published on 27 April 2026.
Who runs Frinton House?
Frinton House is run by Consensus Support Services Limited. It runs 59 services in England, 11 of them in the South East.
What is Frinton House's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 27 April 2026.

Contact

Phone
01424 214430
Address
22 Buckhurst Road, Bexhill On Sea, TN40 1QE Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Lucerne House Good, 0.2 miles away
  2. G
    Jubilee Court Good, 0.2 miles away
  3. G
    Summer Wood Residential Care Home Good, 0.2 miles away
  4. RI
    Arden House Residential Care Home Requires improvement, 0.2 miles away
  5. G
    St Nectans Residential Care Home Good, 0.2 miles away

See all care homes in East Sussex

See all care homes in Bexhill-on-Sea