Regency Park
- Care home
- 3 beds
- No nursing
- Registered since 2022
- Widnes, Halton, North West
Good
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
At a glance
1 rating
Only one rating on record, so there is no trend to show yet.
2 months
since the latest rating was published.
18 of 24
rated care homes in Halton are rated Good, like this one.
Regency Park: inspection record
Rated Good in August 2026.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Compare nearby
- G Madeline McKenna Court Good, 0.7 miles away
- G Glenwood Care Home Good, 0.7 miles away
- G Bankfield Road Good, 0.8 miles away
- G Maeres House Good, 1 mile away
- RI Widnes Hall Requires improvement, 1.1 miles away
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 7 August 2026 (assessment visit 12 June 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
Date of assessment: 17 June to 6 July 2026
Regency Park is a 'care home'. People in care homes receive accommodation and nursing and/or personal care as a single package under one contractual agreement, depending on their registration with us. Regency Park is a care home without nursing care. CQC regulates both the premises and the care provided, and both were assessed during this assessment. At the time of the assessment, the service was supporting three people.
- Safe No rating
- Effective Good
- Caring Good
- Responsive Good
- Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary
We assessed the service against the principles of 'Right Support, Right Care, Right Culture' to make judgements about whether the provider ensured autistic people and people with a learning disability were treated with respect, equality, and dignity, and had choice, independence, and access to their local community.
Medicines were not always managed safely. We identified that medicines were not always administered in line with prescribing instructions. For example, one medicines that should have been given on an empty stomach was not always administered correctly, and one medicine requiring titration had not been managed in accordance with prescribing guidance.
Care plans and risk assessments were in place and provided staff with guidance on how to support people safely. However, some care plans required updating to reflect changes in people's needs and circumstances.
Communication aids were used to support person-centred care. Staff knew people well and involved people and, where appropriate, their relatives in care planning. People were encouraged to develop their independence, make choices, and take positive risks.
Significant changes in people's lives were planned for in advance to help them prepare and understand what to expect. This included supporting people through important transitions, such as leaving college.
People had individual goals and outcomes in place, which were regularly reviewed to ensure they remained relevant and meaningful.
The service worked effectively with health and social care professionals, and referrals were made in a timely manner when required to support people's health and wellbeing.
The provider was in breach of regulations relating to safe care and treatment including the management of medicines.
-
Safe
No rating
Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. This the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated requires improvement. This meant people were not always safe and protected from avoidable harm.
The provider was in breach of legal regulations 12 relating to people’s safe care and treatment including the management of medicines.
-
Effective
Good
Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.
This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.
-
Caring
Good
Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.
-
Responsive
Good
Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.
This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.
-
Well-led
Good
Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.
This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.
Questions to ask when you visit
- Safe was rated Requires improvement on 7 August 2026. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
- Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
- Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.
Registration details
- Registered manager
- Ellie Murphy
- Registered with the CQC since
- What it provides
- Care home service without nursing
- Who it supports
- Children 0-18 years, Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
- Provider
- Bright Futures Care Limited
- Ownership type
- Organisation
- Companies House number
- 08157115 (opens Companies House)
Bright Futures Care Limited runs 21 services, all in the North West. 9 are rated Good or Outstanding and 12 have no rating yet.
Other services run by Bright Futures Care Limited
- O Riverside Point Outstanding. Care home, Warrington
- G Bridgewell House Good. Care home, Warrington
- G Lakenheath Good. Care home, Warrington
- G Rivenhall Good. Care home, Warrington
Getting help from Halton Borough Council
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at Halton Borough Council
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 0303 333 4301 to ask for an assessment. 0151 907 8306 for other Adult Social Care enquiries
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: Halton Borough Council
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does Regency Park provide nursing care?
- No. The Care Quality Commission lists Regency Park as a care home without nursing.
- How many beds does Regency Park have?
- The Care Quality Commission's register lists 3 beds at Regency Park.
- When was Regency Park last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Regency Park was published on 7 August 2026.
- Who runs Regency Park?
- Regency Park is run by Bright Futures Care Limited. It runs 21 services, all in the North West.
- What is Regency Park's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 7 August 2026.
Contact
- Phone
- 01925 759162
- Address
- 6 Regency Park, Widnes, WA8 9PH Map (opens Google Maps)
Compare nearby
- G Madeline McKenna Court Good, 0.7 miles away
- G Glenwood Care Home Good, 0.7 miles away
- G Bankfield Road Good, 0.8 miles away
- G Maeres House Good, 1 mile away
- RI Widnes Hall Requires improvement, 1.1 miles away