Rated Care Homes

Park View

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 3 ratings

    Its last inspection moved it down from Good to Requires improvement.

  • 4 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 21 of 181

    rated care homes in Somerset are rated Requires improvement, like this one.

Park View: inspection record

Care home, 4 beds, Somerset

Rated Requires improvement in June 2026, down from Good.

Park View: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Cherry Trees (Good, 0.1 miles away) and The Light House (Good, 0.2 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    Cherry Trees Good, 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    The Light House Good, 0.2 miles away
  3. G
    Beaufort House Good, 0.2 miles away
  4. RI
    Stratton House Nursing Home Requires improvement, 0.3 miles away
  5. G
    The Towans Care Home Good, 0.3 miles away

See all care homes in Somerset

See all care homes in Burnham-on-Sea

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 4 June 2026 (assessment visit 11 March 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of Assessment: 21 April to 29 April 2026. Park View is a residential care home providing accommodation and personal care to autistic people and/or people who have a learning disability. The home is based in a residential area within walking distance of the town centre and sea front. The service is registered to accommodate up to 4 people. At the time of the inspection 3 people were living in the main house and 1 person was living in the self-contained annex.
We assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted. This was a targeted inspection to follow up on the breaches of regulation identified at the last inspections.

  • Safe No rating
  • Effective Good
  • Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary

At our previous inspection we had found breaches of regulation. At this inspection we found improvements had been made relating to safe care and treatment, medicines and need for consent. The service was no longer in breach of these regulations.
The provider was also previously in breach of the legal regulation relating to governance and the provider remains in breach of this regulation. Since the last inspection the provider had taken action to put systems in place to monitor the quality of the service, and we found no evidence that people had been placed at risk of harm. However, some of these systems were not fully embedded and were not consistently effective in monitoring the quality and safety of the service or in ensuring that records were properly and accurately maintained. As such, some shortfalls in governance systems remained resulting in a continued breach of regulation in good governance.

The provider had made some improvements to learning from incidents, but analysis of trends and timely learning was not always effective. Safeguarding systems were not robust or consistently effective, resulting in unclear actions and risks not always being promptly addressed.
Risk management had improved overall, but some risk mitigation required to be recorded, and behaviour support plans required further development to be fully effective and clear for staff.
Medicines and infection control were managed safely.
People’s needs had been assessed and reviewed, with care documentation reflecting individual preferences and involving relatives and representatives.
Consent processes followed the Mental Capacity Act, with people, their relatives or representatives involved in decision-making. The provider had begun monitoring outcomes more effectively, with improved reviews and involvement from people and professionals.
Care and support were planned and delivered in line with legislation and good practice, supporting activities and family contact.

  1. Safe

    No rating

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question inadequate. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement.

    This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Well-led

    No rating

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has remained requires improvement.

    This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to good governance.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 4 June 2026. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 4 June 2026. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
  3. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.

Registration details

Registered manager
Lee Lomax
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Older People, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

6 inspection reports, latest 14 April 2021. Latest assessment published 4 June 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
National Autistic Society (The)Brand: National Autistic Society
Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
01205298 (opens Companies House)
Charity number
269425

National Autistic Society (The) runs 17 services in England, 5 of them in the South West. 12 are rated Good or Outstanding and 5 are rated Requires improvement or Inadequate.

Other services run by National Autistic Society (The)

  1. G
    Cherry Trees Good. Care home, Somerset
  2. G
    Clayton Brook House Good. Care home, Lancashire, North West
  3. G
    Crossways Good. Care home, Suffolk, East of England
  4. G
    Echo Square House Good. Care home, Kent, South East

See all 17 services run by National Autistic Society (The)

Getting help from Somerset Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Park View provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Park View as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Park View have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 4 beds at Park View.
When was Park View last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Park View was published on 4 June 2026.
Who runs Park View?
Park View is run by National Autistic Society (The). It runs 17 services in England, 5 of them in the South West.
What is Park View's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 4 June 2026.

Contact

Phone
01278 789444
Address
1 Westfield Road, Burnham On Sea, TA8 2AW Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Cherry Trees (Good, 0.1 miles away) and The Light House (Good, 0.2 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    Cherry Trees Good, 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    The Light House Good, 0.2 miles away
  3. G
    Beaufort House Good, 0.2 miles away
  4. RI
    Stratton House Nursing Home Requires improvement, 0.3 miles away
  5. G
    The Towans Care Home Good, 0.3 miles away

See all care homes in Somerset

See all care homes in Burnham-on-Sea