Rated Care Homes

Gowlands

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 3 ratings

    Rated Good at every inspection since 2016.

  • 12 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 295 of 361

    rated care homes in Essex are rated Good, like this one.

Gowlands: inspection record

Care home, 10 beds, Essex

Rated Good in October 2025.

Gowlands: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. RI
    Brook Care Home Requires improvement, 0.3 miles away
  2. G
    Broomhills Good, 0.5 miles away
  3. G
    Broadoaks Good, 0.6 miles away
  4. G
    Stambridge Meadows Care Home Good, 1.4 miles away
  5. G

See all care homes in Essex

See all care homes in Rochford

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 24 October 2025 (assessment visit 27 August 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of Assessment: 2 September 2025 to 16 September 2025.

This service is a residential home providing short stay respite care to people with a learning disability and autistic people. The service is able to accommodate up to 9 people staying at the same time.

  • Safe No rating
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

We assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted.

The provider had processes in place to investigate safeguarding concerns. However, incidents and accidents were not always robustly monitored and reviewed to ensure all appropriate actions were taken. Not all risks to people’s health and safety had been assessed and recorded to ensure staff had detailed guidance about how to manage risks to people safely. There were enough staff available to meet people’s needs. Staff worked well together and understood how people liked to be supported. However, the provider had not always ensured staff recruitment and training processes were monitored robustly.

Staff and leaders had a shared vision and culture which placed people at the centre of the service. Leaders were visible, knowledgeable and supportive. At the time of the inspection, leaders were still in the process of embedding governance processes following a period of management and staffing changes. We found the provider’s governance processes were not yet implemented effectively and this meant safety and quality issues in the service were not always promptly identified and addressed. However, the provider was responsive to feedback given during the inspection, taking immediate action to make improvements and address concerns.

Staff managed people’s medicines safely. People were treated with kindness and compassion, and staff protected their privacy and dignity. People were treated as individuals and staff supported them in line with their preferences. Staff responded to people in a timely way to minimise any distress or discomfort.

People received fair and equal care. The provider worked in partnership with other health professionals to promote good outcomes for people. Staff monitored people’s health to support healthy living and identify any changes or concerns.

The provider supported staff wellbeing. Staff felt encouraged to give feedback and were treated equally, free from bullying or harassment. Staff understood their roles and responsibilities and were given the time and resources to try new ideas to continuously improve people’s experience of care.

  1. Safe

    No rating

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 24 October 2025. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  3. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Hannah Foot
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Children 0-18 years, Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

7 inspection reports, latest 16 March 2018. Latest assessment published 24 October 2025; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
02650043 (opens Companies House)
Charity number
1004432

Hamelin Trust runs 2 services, all in the East of England. 2 are rated Good or Outstanding.

Other services run by Hamelin Trust

  1. G
    The Bungalow Good. Care home, Essex

Getting help from Essex County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Gowlands provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Gowlands as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Gowlands have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 10 beds at Gowlands.
When was Gowlands last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Gowlands was published on 24 October 2025.
Who runs Gowlands?
Gowlands is run by Hamelin Trust. It runs 2 services, all in the East of England.
What is Gowlands's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 24 October 2025.

Contact

Phone
01702 541761
Address
Sutton Bridge Farm, Sutton Road, Rochford, SS4 1XS Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. RI
    Brook Care Home Requires improvement, 0.3 miles away
  2. G
    Broomhills Good, 0.5 miles away
  3. G
    Broadoaks Good, 0.6 miles away
  4. G
    Stambridge Meadows Care Home Good, 1.4 miles away
  5. G

See all care homes in Essex

See all care homes in Rochford