Kingston House
- Care home
- 3 beds
- No nursing
- Registered since 2011
- Liskeard, Cornwall, South West
Requires improvement
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
At a glance
6 ratings
First rated Good in 2015, most recently Requires improvement in August 2026.
2 months
since the latest rating was published.
35 of 190
rated care homes in Cornwall are rated Requires improvement, like this one.
Kingston House: inspection record
Rated Requires improvement in August 2026.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Compare nearby
Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Pengover Residential and Nursing Home (Good, 0.1 miles away) and Beech Lawn Nursing and Residential Home (Good, 0.3 miles away).
Nearest care homes:
- G Pengover Residential and Nursing Home Good, 0.1 miles away
- G Beech Lawn Nursing and Residential Home Good, 0.3 miles away
- G Kilmar House Good, 0.3 miles away
- G Liskeard Eventide Home Good, 0.4 miles away
- RI Dimensions Somerset Pendean Court Requires improvement, 0.5 miles away
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 18 August 2026 (assessment visit 8 June 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
Date of assessment: 10 to 17 June 2026.
Kingston House is a care home that provides accommodation and personal care for up to 3 people with learning disabilities or autistic people. At the time of the inspection 2 people were using the service.
- Safe No rating
- Effective Good
- Caring Good
- Responsive Good
- Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary
We assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted.
Theproviderwas previously in breach of the legal regulations in relation to safe care and treatment, governance and staff recruitment.
At this assessment, we found some improvements had been made and that people now received safe care and treatment. In addition, the service now has a register manager who was providing effective leadership to the staff team.
However, the service’s recruitment practices remained unsafe, risks in relation to the environment had not been effectively managed and governance systems had again failed to ensure compliance with the regulations.
Staff had not been recruited safely. Necessary checks to confirm the identity of perspective staff had not been completed and evidence of their previous good conduct had not been collected. This meant people using the service were unnecessarily exposed to risk.
Risk in the environment of the service had not been appropriately mitigated. Necessary repairs had not been completed to address identified failures with the service’s electrical system and risks associated with uncovered radiators and an unrestricted window had not been mitigated.
People were comfortable in the service and staff were kind and attentive. People’s interests were encouraged and decisions respected. Staff knew people well and effectively met people’s communication needs.
Staffing levels were sufficient to meet people’s needs. Training had been regularly updated to ensure staff had the skills to meet people’s needs and regular supervision was provided.
Staff understood their role in protecting people from abuse and all forms of discrimination. Care plans were accurate and risks in relation to people’s care needs had been identified and mitigated. People were safely supported with medicines and all accidents and incidents were appropriately investigated to identify any areas of learning.
Formal assessments of people’s capacity to make specific decisions had been completed, necessary Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards applications made and conditions complied with.
The service worked effectively with professionals to ensure people’s needs were met and to develop individualised activities that impacted positively on people’s wellbeing.
The service was now led by a registered manager who provided effective leadership and support to the staff team. However, the provider’s governance systems were not entirely effective and had failed to ensure compliance with the requirements of the regulations.
Theproviderremained in breach of the regulations in relation to safe recruitment and governance. A further breach of the regulation in relation to premises and equipment was also identified.
In instances where CQC has begun a process of regulatory action, we may publish this information on our website after any representations and/or appeals have been concluded, if the action has been taken forward.
-
Safe
No rating
Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.
At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has remained requires improvement.
This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed.
The provider was in breach of legal regulation in relation to recruitment and safe premises and equipment.
-
Effective
Good
Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good.
This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.
-
Caring
Good
Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good.
This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.
-
Responsive
Good
Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good.
This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.
-
Well-led
No rating
Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.
At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has remained requires improvement.
This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care. The provider was in breach of legal regulation in relation to governance.
Questions to ask when you visit
- Safe was rated Requires improvement on 18 August 2026. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
- Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 18 August 2026. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
- Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
Registration details
- Registered manager
- Anne Nicholas
- Registered with the CQC since
- What it provides
- Care home service without nursing
- Who it supports
- Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)8 inspection reports, latest 14 December 2023. Latest assessment published 18 August 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.
The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
- Provider
- Westlake Care
- Ownership type
- Partnership
Westlake Care runs 2 services, all in the South West. 1 is rated Good or Outstanding and 1 is rated Requires improvement or Inadequate.
Other services run by Westlake Care
- G Brookland House Good. Care home, Plymouth
Getting help from Cornwall Council
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at Cornwall Council
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 0300 1234 131, Monday, Tuesday, Thursday and Friday 9am to 5pm, Wednesday 10am to 5pm
- Contact adult social care online
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: Cornwall Council
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does Kingston House provide nursing care?
- No. The Care Quality Commission lists Kingston House as a care home without nursing.
- How many beds does Kingston House have?
- The Care Quality Commission's register lists 3 beds at Kingston House.
- When was Kingston House last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Kingston House was published on 18 August 2026.
- Who runs Kingston House?
- Kingston House is run by Westlake Care. It runs 2 services, all in the South West.
- What is Kingston House's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 18 August 2026.
Contact
- Phone
- 01579 346993
- Address
- Miners Way, Liskeard, PL14 3ET Map (opens Google Maps)
Compare nearby
Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Pengover Residential and Nursing Home (Good, 0.1 miles away) and Beech Lawn Nursing and Residential Home (Good, 0.3 miles away).
Nearest care homes:
- G Pengover Residential and Nursing Home Good, 0.1 miles away
- G Beech Lawn Nursing and Residential Home Good, 0.3 miles away
- G Kilmar House Good, 0.3 miles away
- G Liskeard Eventide Home Good, 0.4 miles away
- RI Dimensions Somerset Pendean Court Requires improvement, 0.5 miles away