Rated Care Homes

Elm Lodge

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 3 ratings

    Rated Good at every inspection since 2017.

  • 2 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 214 of 258

    rated care homes in East Sussex are rated Good, like this one.

Elm Lodge: inspection record

Care home, 27 beds, East Sussex

Rated Good in August 2026.

Elm Lodge: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
  2. G
    Aston House Good, 0.1 miles away
  3. G
    Homelea Residential Care Home Good, 0.1 miles away
  4. G
    Dorley House Residential Care Home Good, 0.1 miles away
  5. –
    Alice Court Care Home Not yet rated, 0.1 miles away

See all care homes in East Sussex

See all care homes in Eastbourne

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 11 August 2026 (assessment visit 7 July 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

About the service

Elm Lodge is a residential care home providing accommodation for up to 27 people. At the time of the visit there were 26 people living at the service.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

Support was delivered over 2 floors. People were supported to access all communal areas of the home including the garden.

Who the service is for

The service supports older people including people living with dementia and physical health needs.

Key findings

We carried out this assessment on 29 July 2026. This service was previously rated as good. We carried out this assessment to confirm whether the rating of good remains accurate. This report does not provide detailed information on areas where we found practice continues to meet a good standard. Instead, our findings focus on any areas where the service needs to improve or where we found exceptional practice.

People told us they felt safe living at the home. Relatives confirmed people received safe and effective care and spoke positively about the high level of kindness and support provided by staff and the positive impact this had on their loved one.

People were supported by enough staff who had the skills, knowledge and experience to support them safely and meet their specific health and care needs. Staff completed regular training to ensure people’s needs could be safely met.

Staff consistently spoke about people being at the heart of the home and we saw respectful, engaging interactions by staff throughout the inspection. Several staff including the registered and deputy manager had worked at Elm Lodge for many years. Staff told us they saw Elm Lodge as an extension of their home and considered people living there were like family. People told us, “Over time I have built up a lovely relationship with some staff, they are very important to me” and “The staff are very kind.”

People can only be deprived of their liberty to receive care and treatment with appropriate legal authority. In care homes, this can be done through a procedure called the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS), which is part of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA). We checked whether the service was working within the principles of the MCA and how they managed DoLS within the service. We found that staff and management worked within the MCA. DoLS authorisations were appropriately applied for and overseen. People were not subject to unlawful or excessive restrictions they had choice, control and freedom over their lives.

Relatives feedback included how people were not restricted and staff understood people’s needs. One told us, “People are supported to walk around rather than being encouraged to sit down in one place which would lead to increased levels of anxiety.” Another told us their relative was more alert and required less medication for anxiety than they had in a previous home.

Risks were assessed and reviewed. This included risk relating to people’s dementia, falls, infection, poor cognition or confusion. All identified risks were reviewed regularly and referrals made to other health professionals when required.

Care plans were detailed and included relevant information to ensure staff had access to the information needed to meet people’s needs. Daily notes were detailed and person centred. Medicines were administered safely with clear management oversight and involvement of GP’s and other health professionals when required. Staff demonstrated a good understanding of medicines prescribed for people and how these should be safely administered.

There were systems in place to ensure the environment was safe. The home had a designated maintenance employee. All required environmental and service checks were completed. Relatives described the environment as, “No frills” with one telling us, “I have been to big care homes with loads of vases of flowers and smart carpets but that does not always mean good care. Here it is lovely, the staff are amazing and the care is second to none.”

The registered manager worked closely with the staff team and staff told us, “The manager is excellent.”

Systems and processes were in place to monitor the quality and safety of the service. The registered manager regularly attended courses and training to ensure best practice and to continue to develop and improve the service.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained a good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  2. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Svetlana Cvetanovska
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

5 inspection reports, latest 21 April 2021. Latest assessment published 11 August 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Individual

Getting help from East Sussex County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Elm Lodge provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Elm Lodge as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Elm Lodge have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 27 beds at Elm Lodge.
When was Elm Lodge last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Elm Lodge was published on 11 August 2026.
Who runs Elm Lodge?
Elm Lodge is run by Dr V Sapatnekar.
What is Elm Lodge's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 11 August 2026.

Contact

Phone
01323 419257
Address
107-109 Enys Road, Eastbourne, BN21 2ED Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
  2. G
    Aston House Good, 0.1 miles away
  3. G
    Homelea Residential Care Home Good, 0.1 miles away
  4. G
    Dorley House Residential Care Home Good, 0.1 miles away
  5. –
    Alice Court Care Home Not yet rated, 0.1 miles away

See all care homes in East Sussex

See all care homes in Eastbourne