Rowland House Care Home
- Care home
- 7 beds
- No nursing
- Registered since 2011
- Thames Ditton, Surrey, South East
Requires improvement
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
At a glance
4 ratings
Its last inspection moved it down from Good to Requires improvement.
11 months
since the latest rating was published.
56 of 302
rated care homes in Surrey are rated Requires improvement, like this one.
Rowland House Care Home: inspection record
Rated Requires improvement in November 2025, down from Good.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Compare nearby
Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Linwood (Good, 0.1 miles away) and Emberbrook Care Home (Good, 0.2 miles away).
Nearest care homes:
- G Linwood Good, 0.1 miles away
- G Emberbrook Care Home Good, 0.2 miles away
- – Thames View Not yet rated, 0.3 miles away
- G Beech Lodge - Thames Ditton Good, 0.4 miles away
- RI Oakley House Ltd Requires improvement, 0.5 miles away
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 11 November 2025 (assessment visit 15 September 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
Date of assessment: 30 September 2025.
Rowland House Care Home is a service for people with an acquired brain injury or neurological conditions. There were 5 people living in the service at the time of our visit.
- Safe Good
- Effective Good
- Caring Good
- Responsive No rating
- Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary
The service was without a registered manager. However, the provider had placed an interim manager to oversee the service. The interim manager had been in post for 3 months.
Improvements were needed to ensure staff were providing activities and meaningful opportunities on a regular basis to people. In addition, work needed to continue to embed a consistent improved culture of person-centred care to ensure it was sustained across all aspects of the service. Further work was required to develop external links and partnerships to help people stay connected with the wider community and enhance their quality of life and staff needed to be given the opportunity to be more involved in the running of the service through staff meetings.
Medicines storage arrangements needed to improve to help ensure medicines were stored in line with manufacturers guidance and some areas that were at risk of harbouring infection required action. The interim manager had, however, identified these areas as shortfalls and were already working on making the necessary changes.
People’s care plans lacked information around their life histories as well as their end of life wishes. Both would help staff to get to know people better and help provide them with greater detail to help them provide care in line with people’s preferences.
The interim manager had made positive changes to the service since being in post and staff fed back that they felt happier working at the service. They told us there were enough of them to provide care for people and that they felt management supported and listened to them.
There were good processes in place for recruitment of staff, recording and analysing accidents and incidents and reporting any issues of concern to the relevant authorities. Where external healthcare input was needed staff sought this promptly and they worked with these professionals to help provide people with the most appropriate care.
-
Safe
Good
Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.
At our last assessment we rated this key question Good. At this assessment the rating has remained Good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.
-
Effective
Good
Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.
At our last assessment we rated this key question Good. At this assessment the rating has remained Good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.
-
Caring
Good
Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.
At our last assessment we rated this key question Good. At this assessment the rating has remained Good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.
-
Responsive
No rating
Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.
At our last assessment we rated this key question Good. At this assessment the rating has changed to Requires Improvement. This meant people’s needs were not always met.
-
Well-led
No rating
Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.
At our last assessment we rated this key question Good. At this assessment the rating has changed to Requires Improvement. This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care.
Questions to ask when you visit
- Responsive was rated Requires improvement on 11 November 2025. Ask to see how care plans are kept up to date, how complaints are handled and what activities are on offer.
- Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 11 November 2025. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
- Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
Registration details
- Registered manager
- Vicki Mcnally
- Registered with the CQC since
- What it provides
- Care home service without nursing, Rehabilitation services
- Who it supports
- Older People, Physical Disability, Younger Adults
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)7 inspection reports, latest 16 July 2021. Latest assessment published 11 November 2025; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.
The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
- Provider
- Titleworth Neuro LimitedBrand: Active Care
- Ownership type
- Organisation
- Companies House number
- 01416615 (opens Companies House)
Getting help from Surrey County Council
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at Surrey County Council
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 0300 200 1005, Monday to Friday, 9am to 5pm
- Contact adult social care online
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: Surrey County Council
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does Rowland House Care Home provide nursing care?
- No. The Care Quality Commission lists Rowland House Care Home as a care home without nursing.
- How many beds does Rowland House Care Home have?
- The Care Quality Commission's register lists 7 beds at Rowland House Care Home.
- When was Rowland House Care Home last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Rowland House Care Home was published on 11 November 2025.
- Who runs Rowland House Care Home?
- Rowland House Care Home is run by Titleworth Neuro Limited.
- What is Rowland House Care Home's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 11 November 2025.
Contact
- Phone
- 020 8972 9143
- Address
- 1a Lime Tree Avenue, Thames Ditton, KT7 0NY Map (opens Google Maps)
Compare nearby
Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Linwood (Good, 0.1 miles away) and Emberbrook Care Home (Good, 0.2 miles away).
Nearest care homes:
- G Linwood Good, 0.1 miles away
- G Emberbrook Care Home Good, 0.2 miles away
- – Thames View Not yet rated, 0.3 miles away
- G Beech Lodge - Thames Ditton Good, 0.4 miles away
- RI Oakley House Ltd Requires improvement, 0.5 miles away