Rated Care Homes

Hebburn Court Nursing Home

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 5 ratings

    Its last inspection improved it from Inadequate to Good.

  • 3 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 27 of 30

    rated care homes in South Tyneside are rated Good, like this one.

Hebburn Court Nursing Home: inspection record

Care home with nursing, 55 beds, South Tyneside

Rated Good in July 2026, up from Inadequate.

Hebburn Court Nursing Home: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. –
    Hebburn Day Care (New Respite & Community Branch) Not yet rated, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Bedewell Grange Good, 0.1 miles away
  3. G
    Hebburn Manor Good, 0.3 miles away
  4. G
    21 North View Good, 0.5 miles away
  5. G
    The White House Nursing Home Good, 0.5 miles away

See all care homes in South Tyneside

See all care homes in Hebburn

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 17 July 2026 (assessment visit 5 May 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment 23 June 2026. Hebburn Court Nursing Home provides accommodation with nursing and personal care for up to 53 people, some of whom were living with dementia. When we inspected 26 people were living at the service.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

This inspection was to follow up on breaches identified at out last assessment. At the last inspection in June 2025, the service was rated requires improvement and was in breach of regulation relating to good governance. At this inspection, we found improvements had been made and rated the service good. The provider was no longer in breach of regulations relating to good governance.

The provider had acted on the shortfalls with oversight of accident and incident and medicines management identified at the last assessment, particularly recording of ‘as required’ medicines. However, further improvements were required to ensure staff accurately recorded when time critical medicines had been administered. The registered manager acted immediately to resolve this.

The provider had systems in place to assess and manage risks, and the environment was clean and well maintained. Regular fire safety checks, including monthly drills, were completed.

Staff supported people well during mealtimes, with people receiving the support they needed to have enough to eat and drink.

People had regular access to a range of health and social care professionals, care plans included recommendations from professionals to help ensure people received appropriate care. Where people lacked capacity, Mental Capacity Act (MCA) assessments and best interest decisions were documented for restrictions placed on them.

The provider’s quality assurance processes were more structured and were now effective in identifying areas for improvement and learning. This included a range of audits to check on falls management, medicines and infection prevention and control (IPC).

Staff received good support and spoke positively about improvements in the service, describing better management support and investment in the home.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs. At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask how nursing cover works at night and at weekends.
  2. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  3. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Deborah Poulter
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service with nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Mental Health, Older People, Physical Disability, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
13259398 (opens Companies House)

GB Healthcare Group Ltd runs 3 services in England, 1 of them in the North East. 2 are rated Good or Outstanding and 1 is rated Requires improvement or Inadequate.

Other services run by GB Healthcare Group Ltd

  1. G
    Cottingham Hall Good. Care home, Hull, Yorkshire and the Humber
  2. I
    Blossom Lodge Inadequate. Care home with nursing, Barnsley, Yorkshire and the Humber

Getting help from South Tyneside Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Hebburn Court Nursing Home provide nursing care?
Yes. The Care Quality Commission lists Hebburn Court Nursing Home as a care home with nursing.
How many beds does Hebburn Court Nursing Home have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 55 beds at Hebburn Court Nursing Home.
When was Hebburn Court Nursing Home last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Hebburn Court Nursing Home was published on 17 July 2026.
Who runs Hebburn Court Nursing Home?
Hebburn Court Nursing Home is run by GB Healthcare Group Ltd. It runs 3 services in England, 1 of them in the North East.
What is Hebburn Court Nursing Home's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 17 July 2026.

Contact

Address
The Old Vicarage, Witty Avenue, Hebburn, NE31 2SE Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. –
    Hebburn Day Care (New Respite & Community Branch) Not yet rated, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Bedewell Grange Good, 0.1 miles away
  3. G
    Hebburn Manor Good, 0.3 miles away
  4. G
    21 North View Good, 0.5 miles away
  5. G
    The White House Nursing Home Good, 0.5 miles away

See all care homes in South Tyneside

See all care homes in Hebburn