Cherington
- Care home
- 42 beds
- Nursing care
- Dementia care
- Registered since 2011
- Bognor Regis, West Sussex, South East
Requires improvement
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
At a glance
5 ratings
Its last inspection moved it down from Good to Requires improvement.
9 months
since the latest rating was published.
47 of 309
rated care homes in West Sussex are rated Requires improvement, like this one.
Cherington: inspection record
Rated Requires improvement in January 2026, down from Good.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Compare nearby
Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Arun Lodge Residential Care Home (Good, less than 0.1 miles away) and Shaftesbury Ashley Place (Good, 0.1 miles away).
Nearest care homes:
- RI Albany House - Bognor Regis Requires improvement, less than 0.1 miles away
- G Arun Lodge Residential Care Home Good, less than 0.1 miles away
- RI Homebeech Requires improvement, less than 0.1 miles away
- G Shaftesbury Ashley Place Good, 0.1 miles away
- G Oban House Residential Care Home Good, 0.1 miles away
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 7 January 2026 (assessment visit 30 October 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
Date of Assessment: 21 November to 5 December 2025. The service is a residential care home providing support to older people, including people living with dementia, and additional nursing care needs. This assessment was undertaken in response to concerns raised by the local authority, and to follow-up on improvements implemented since the last inspection undertaken in March 2019. We found 4 breaches of regulations relating to staffing, dignity and respect, person-centred care and good governance.
- Safe No rating
- Effective Good
- Caring No rating
- Responsive No rating
- Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary
The service is registered for use by autistic people or people with a learning disability. At the time of the assessment, the service was not used by anyone with a learning disability or an autistic person. However, we assessed the care provision under Right Support, Right Care, Right Culture, as it is registered as a specialist service for this population group.
Staffing levels, including staff deployment, were not sufficient to ensure people received an acceptable standard of care which put them at risk. The home was dependent on a high use of agency staff as they had difficulty recruiting permanent staff, and this impacted on the consistency of care. Not all staff had completed the mandatory updates to training required by the provider, including infection prevention and control and safeguarding.
People were not always treated with dignity and respect, and the care delivered was task-led rather than person-centred. There was a lack of meaningful activities organised for people and a lack of mental stimulation. The physical environment was not dementia-friendly. Systems were not sufficiently robust to measure and monitor the home overall in order to drive improvement.
Accidents and incidents were logged and analysed, with any lessons learned shared with staff. Information was shared with other providers when people moved between services. The home provided a safe environment for people, and adaptations enabled people to move freely around the home. The environment, whilst accessible and uncluttered, did not provide inspiration for people living with dementia.
The home was generally clean and well maintained. Medicines were managed safely.
Assessments of people’s care and support needs were completed before they came to live at the home. Staff worked with a variety of services and shared information appropriately. Consent to care and treatment was gained lawfully. People’s end of life wishes were listened to and documented.
At the end of the inspection, we received assurances from the provider that issues found as part of this assessment were being addressed.
We have asked the provider for an action plan in response to the concerns found at this assessment.
-
Safe
No rating
Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.
At our last inspection we rated this key question good. At this assessment, the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed. We found a breach of legal regulation in relation to staffing.
-
Effective
Good
Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.
At our last inspection we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained the same. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.
-
Caring
No rating
Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.
At our last inspection we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant people did not always feel well-supported, cared for or treated with dignity and respect. We found a breach of legal regulation in relation to dignity and respect.
-
Responsive
No rating
Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.
At our last inspection we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant people’s needs were not always met. We found a breach of legal regulation in relation to person-centred care.
-
Well-led
No rating
Well led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care, supported learning and innovation, and promoted an open, fair culture.
At our last inspection we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has remained the same. This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care. We found a breach of legal regulation in relation to governance.
Questions to ask when you visit
- Safe was rated Requires improvement on 7 January 2026. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
- Caring was rated Requires improvement on 7 January 2026. Ask how staff protect dignity and how residents are involved in decisions about their care.
- Responsive was rated Requires improvement on 7 January 2026. Ask to see how care plans are kept up to date, how complaints are handled and what activities are on offer.
- Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 7 January 2026. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
Registration details
- Registered with the CQC since
- What it provides
- Care home service with nursing
- Who it supports
- Dementia, Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Older People, Younger Adults
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)8 inspection reports, latest 16 April 2021. Latest assessment published 7 January 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.
The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
- Provider
- Homebeech LimitedBrand: Saffronland Homes
- Ownership type
- Organisation
- Companies House number
- 03532708 (opens Companies House)
Homebeech Limited runs 2 services, all in the South East. 0 are rated Good or Outstanding and 2 are rated Requires improvement or Inadequate.
Other services run by Homebeech Limited
- RI Homebeech Requires improvement. Care home with nursing, West Sussex
Getting help from West Sussex County Council
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at West Sussex County Council
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 01243 642121, Monday to Friday, 9am to 5pm
- Contact adult social care online
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: West Sussex County Council
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does Cherington provide nursing care?
- Yes. The Care Quality Commission lists Cherington as a care home with nursing.
- How many beds does Cherington have?
- The Care Quality Commission's register lists 42 beds at Cherington.
- When was Cherington last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Cherington was published on 7 January 2026.
- Who runs Cherington?
- Cherington is run by Homebeech Limited. It runs 2 services, all in the South East.
- What is Cherington's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 7 January 2026.
Contact
- Phone
- 01243 865936
- Address
- 15-17 Stocker Road, Bognor Regis, PO21 2QL Map (opens Google Maps)
Compare nearby
Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Arun Lodge Residential Care Home (Good, less than 0.1 miles away) and Shaftesbury Ashley Place (Good, 0.1 miles away).
Nearest care homes:
- RI Albany House - Bognor Regis Requires improvement, less than 0.1 miles away
- G Arun Lodge Residential Care Home Good, less than 0.1 miles away
- RI Homebeech Requires improvement, less than 0.1 miles away
- G Shaftesbury Ashley Place Good, 0.1 miles away
- G Oban House Residential Care Home Good, 0.1 miles away