Eden Mansions Nursing Home
- Care home
- 102 beds
- Nursing care
- Dementia care
- Registered since 2010
- Cheshire East, North West
Good
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
At a glance
3 ratings
Rated Good at every inspection since 2016.
11 months
since the latest rating was published.
67 of 88
rated care homes in Cheshire East are rated Good, like this one.
Eden Mansions Nursing Home: inspection record
Rated Good in December 2025.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Compare nearby
- – Long Stone Manor Not yet rated, 0.9 miles away
- G Royal College Manchester Good, 1 mile away
- G Jackson House Good, 1.1 miles away
- G Griffin Lodge Good, 1.2 miles away
- – Wilmslow Manor Care Centre Not yet rated, 1.4 miles away
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 2 December 2025 (assessment visit 4 September 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
Date of assessment: 18 September to 8 October 2025. Eden Mansions Nursing Home is a care home providing care and support for up to 102 younger and older people, including those living with dementia and mental health problems. At the time of our assessment there were 95 people living at the service. The home is made up of 4 separate units known as ‘Villas’. We undertook this assessment following a review of the intelligence we hold about the service.
- Safe No rating
- Effective Good
- Caring Good
- Responsive Good
- Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary
The provider had a good learning culture and people could raise concerns. Overall, there were systems in place to assess and manage risks. However, the provider needed to ensure staff always followed procedures and comprehensive risk assessments were undertaken. The environment and equipment were maintained and kept clean. There were some actions in progress to further mitigate identified environmental risks. Whilst systems were in place to ensure people were protected from abuse, with any concerns reported, staff needed to ensure local procedures were always robustly followed. Further training was in progress in relation to this. The provider ensured people received their medicines as prescribed and these were well managed.
The provider ensured there were enough suitably trained staff. Staff felt they were fairly treated and supported through supervisions and other means. However, there were a few gaps in records to demonstrate all staff received supervision in line with the provider’s policy.
Whist staff undertook pre-admission assessments, these were often not in person, which could potentially impact the accuracy and completeness of information. The registered manager agreed to review this approach. Staff sought consent from people and made decisions in line with the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA) where required. People were treated as individuals, and staff supported their preferences and wishes.
Leaders ensured people were at the centre of their care. People’s care plans contained person specific details including information about their lives and histories. We found staff were responsive and acted promptly in response to changes in people's presentation. They worked in partnership with other health and social care professionals. Care plans included information about how to support people’s health conditions. However, some care plans contained contradictory information, which staff addressed immediately.
Staff completed monthly reviews, although some relatives said they had not been involved in these. A team of wellbeing coordinators produced an activity programme including coffee mornings, karaoke sessions and outings.The management team were knowledgeable and understood their roles and responsibilities. We found them to be open and responsive. Quality assurance systems were in place. Leaders carried out various checks and audits and had recently completed an improvement plan. However, these audits did not identify or address all the issues we identified, including gaps in risk management and other records.
The provider continued to invest in the service and there was a strong focus on continuous improvement. They had a refurbishment plan in progress, along with other developments.
-
Safe
No rating
Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed.
-
Effective
Good
Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.
-
Caring
Good
Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.
-
Responsive
Good
Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.
-
Well-led
Good
Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.
Questions to ask when you visit
- Safe was rated Requires improvement on 2 December 2025. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
- Ask how nursing cover works at night and at weekends.
- Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
Registration details
- Registered manager
- Natalee Jackson
- Registered with the CQC since
- What it provides
- Care home service with nursing
- Who it supports
- Dementia, Mental Health, Older People, Younger Adults
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)6 inspection reports, latest 10 March 2021. Latest assessment published 2 December 2025; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.
The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
- Provider
- Barker Care Limited
- Ownership type
- Organisation
- Companies House number
- 01385930 (opens Companies House)
Barker Care Limited runs 9 services in England, 5 of them in the North West. 6 are rated Good or Outstanding, 1 is rated Requires improvement or Inadequate and 2 have no rating yet.
Other services run by Barker Care Limited
- G Arbour Walk Good. Care home with nursing, Bristol, South West
- G Cedar Park Nursing Home Good. Care home with nursing, Bath and North East Somerset, South West
- G Orchid Villa Good. Care home with nursing, Cheshire West and Chester
- G Rose Villa Good. Care home with nursing, Cheshire West and Chester
Getting help from Cheshire East Council
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at Cheshire East Council
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 0300 123 5010. Out-of-hours emergencies: 0300 123 5022
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: Cheshire East Council
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does Eden Mansions Nursing Home provide nursing care?
- Yes. The Care Quality Commission lists Eden Mansions Nursing Home as a care home with nursing.
- How many beds does Eden Mansions Nursing Home have?
- The Care Quality Commission's register lists 102 beds at Eden Mansions Nursing Home.
- When was Eden Mansions Nursing Home last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Eden Mansions Nursing Home was published on 2 December 2025.
- Who runs Eden Mansions Nursing Home?
- Eden Mansions Nursing Home is run by Barker Care Limited. It runs 9 services in England, 5 of them in the North West.
- What is Eden Mansions Nursing Home's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 2 December 2025.
Contact
- Phone
- 01625 524276
- Address
- Station Road, Styal, Wilmslow, SK9 4HD Map (opens Google Maps)
Compare nearby
- – Long Stone Manor Not yet rated, 0.9 miles away
- G Royal College Manchester Good, 1 mile away
- G Jackson House Good, 1.1 miles away
- G Griffin Lodge Good, 1.2 miles away
- – Wilmslow Manor Care Centre Not yet rated, 1.4 miles away