Drumconner Lancing
- Care home
- 60 beds
- Nursing care
- Registered since 2010
- Lancing, West Sussex, South East
Good
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
At a glance
5 ratings
Its last inspection improved it from Inadequate to Good.
5 months
since the latest rating was published.
250 of 309
rated care homes in West Sussex are rated Good, like this one.
Drumconner Lancing: inspection record
Rated Good in May 2026, up from Inadequate.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Compare nearby
- – Lancing Beach Care Home Not yet rated, 0.2 miles away
- G Stanbridge House Good, 0.7 miles away
- G Mermaid Lodge Good, 0.9 miles away
- G Ball Tree Croft Good, 1 mile away
- G Appletree House Residential Care Home Good, 1 mile away
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 28 May 2026 (assessment visit 28 April 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
Date of Assessment: 6 May to 12 May 2026. Drumconner Lancing provide accommodation with nursing and personal care for up to 60 people. At inspection 47 people were receiving a service. People’s needs included clinical nursing care, physical disabilities and fragility of old age. Some people with health care needs were living with dementia. Three people with healthcare needs had a learning disability.
- Safe Good
- Effective Good
- Caring Good
- Responsive Good
- Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary
This comprehensive assessment was undertaken to follow up enforcement and assess improvements since the last inspection. At this inspection improvements had been made, and the required level of compliance had been met.
The previous rating for this service was inadequate. The provider was previously in breach of 6 legal regulations in relation to person-centred care, safeguarding, staffing, dignity and respect, governance and safe care and treatment. Sustained improvements were identified at this assessment, and the provider was no longer in breach of these regulations The service is now rated good.
People now received respectful and dignified care. Restrictions placed on people were now proportionate and lawful. Care plans were now person-centred and reflected people’s needs and preferences. Risks were now identified, assessed and mitigated including health and safety and environmental risks. Governance processes were now effective to assess, monitor and drive service improvements. There was now safe and effective deployment of staff.
People’s needs were assessed and reflected in person-centred care plans, including their health, communication needs and preferences. Care plans for people with a learning disability reflected national best practice guidance, including the principles of Right support, right care and right culture (RSRCRC). This is a framework that promotes person-centred care, independence, dignity, choice and positive outcomes for people with a learning disability and autistic people. Staff worked closely with health and social care professionals to support people’s wellbeing and promote positive outcomes, independence and meaningful experiences.
Staff were consistently respectful, warm and attentive. Staff supported people to maintain their independence and make choices about their care. Relatives and professionals spoke positively about the caring relationships within the service and the welcoming and supportive atmosphere.
People received responsive care that reflected their individual needs, preferences and diverse backgrounds. Staff promoted equality and diversity and supported equitable access to care, activities and community opportunities. Staff worked closely with families and professionals to ensure people received coordinated support and meaningful experiences which improved their wellbeing.
The service was well-led by a consistent and supportive management team who promoted a positive and inclusive culture. Staff felt valued, respected and proud of the care they provided and felt able to speak up. Leaders demonstrated a commitment to continuous learning and sustained improvement, using feedback and shared learning to strengthen quality monitoring systems, improve compliance and drive positive change across the service.
This service has been in Special Measures since 14 January 2026. The provider demonstrated improvements that have been made. The service is no longer rated as inadequate overall or in any of the key questions. Therefore, this service is no longer in Special Measures.
-
Safe
Good
Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.
At our last assessment we rated this key question inadequate. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.
The provider was previously in breach of 3 legal regulations in relation to people’s safe care and treatment, safeguarding and staffing. Sustained improvements were identified at this assessment, and the provider was no longer in breach of regulation.
-
Effective
Good
Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.
At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.
-
Caring
Good
Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.
At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect and involved as partners in their care.
The provider was previously in breach of the legal regulation in relation to dignity and respect. Sustained improvements were found at this assessment, and the provider was no longer in breach of this regulation.
-
Responsive
Good
Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.
At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.
The provider was previously in breach of the legal regulation in relation to person-centred care. Improvements were found at this assessment, and the provider was no longer in breach of this regulation.
-
Well-led
Good
Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.
At our last assessment we rated this key question inadequate. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.
Theproviderwas previously in breach of the legal regulation in relation to governance at the service and of their regulation conditions. Sustained improvements were found at this assessment, and theproviderwas no longer in breach of this regulation.
Questions to ask when you visit
- Ask how nursing cover works at night and at weekends.
- Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
- Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.
Registration details
- Registered manager
- Samantha White
- Registered with the CQC since
- What it provides
- Care home service with nursing
- Who it supports
- Older People, Physical Disability
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)7 inspection reports, latest 25 August 2018. Latest assessment published 28 May 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.
The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
- Provider
- Drumconner Limited
- Ownership type
- Organisation
- Companies House number
- 01636296 (opens Companies House)
Getting help from West Sussex County Council
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at West Sussex County Council
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 01243 642121, Monday to Friday, 9am to 5pm
- Contact adult social care online
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: West Sussex County Council
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does Drumconner Lancing provide nursing care?
- Yes. The Care Quality Commission lists Drumconner Lancing as a care home with nursing.
- How many beds does Drumconner Lancing have?
- The Care Quality Commission's register lists 60 beds at Drumconner Lancing.
- When was Drumconner Lancing last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Drumconner Lancing was published on 28 May 2026.
- Who runs Drumconner Lancing?
- Drumconner Lancing is run by Drumconner Limited.
- What is Drumconner Lancing's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 28 May 2026.
Contact
- Phone
- 01903 753516
- Address
- 13-21 Brighton Road, Lancing, BN15 8RJ Map (opens Google Maps)
Compare nearby
- – Lancing Beach Care Home Not yet rated, 0.2 miles away
- G Stanbridge House Good, 0.7 miles away
- G Mermaid Lodge Good, 0.9 miles away
- G Ball Tree Croft Good, 1 mile away
- G Appletree House Residential Care Home Good, 1 mile away