Rated Care Homes

The Old Vicarage Care Home

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 5 ratings

    First rated Requires improvement in 2015, most recently Requires improvement in June 2025.

  • 16 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 4 of 39

    rated care homes in North Tyneside are rated Requires improvement, like this one.

The Old Vicarage Care Home: inspection record

Care home, 36 beds, North Tyneside

Rated Requires improvement in June 2025.

The Old Vicarage Care Home: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Collingwood Court (Outstanding, 0.4 miles away) and Princes Court (Good, 0.5 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. O
    Collingwood Court Outstanding, 0.4 miles away
  2. G
    Princes Court Good, 0.5 miles away
  3. –
    Kingfisher House Not yet rated, 0.6 miles away
  4. G
    Appleby Good, 0.6 miles away
  5. RI
    Primrose Lodge Care Home Requires improvement, 0.7 miles away

See all care homes in North Tyneside

See all care homes in North Shields

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 18 June 2025 (assessment visit 9 April 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment: 30 April to 29 May 2025. The Old Vicarage is a care home providing accommodation personal and nursing care to a maximum of 36 older people, including people who may live with dementia. At the time of our unannounced visit, 25 people were using the service. A new manager was in post, since the last inspection, who had applied to become registered with the Commission. However, they left straight after the inspection, and an interim manager was employed by the provider, until a new manager was recruited. At our last inspection, improvements were needed to medicine management arrangements and to the governance systems so they ensured an open culture prevailed. At this inspection we found further improvements were required to systems, staffing levels, staff training, care records, activities, infection control, medicines management and governance to ensure people received safe, effective and person-centred care. People, relatives and staff spoke positively about staff, the manager who had just left, and the improvements they had made. The manager had introduced some improvements to the running of the service, including an ongoing programme of refurbishment. The environment was becoming better maintained, there was a programme of refurbishment around the home. However, we signposted the provider to guidance around how to design the environment so that it meets the needs of people who may live with dementia or a dementia related condition to keep them orientated and informed. We discussed with the manager improvements needed to ensure all areas of the home were clean and odour free. People’s care records and medicines records did not all provide guidance to ensure people received safe and person-centred care. Systems were in place to ensure people were kept safe and protected from the risk of harm and abuse, however improvements were needed to care records and the management of risk to ensure people’s safety. People had access to healthcare and support when they needed it. People’s mental capacity and ability to consent was taken into account. People and their representatives were involved in planning their care and support. Improvements were needed to staffing levels and staff deployment to ensure people received safe and person-centred care. There were limited activities and entertainment, and people did not have the opportunity to go out. Staff were busy and people were not kept engaged or occupied, if they wished. Staffing records did not evidence that robust recruitment checks were carried out to ensure people’s safety. A system of staff supervision was in place and staff training was in the process of being updated however further training was needed to give staff more insight into some people’s needs. Governance was not always effective. More frequent audits, and walk arounds were needed to ensure the timeliness of actions and to maintain the quality and safety of service provision. Accidents and incidents were investigated thoroughly, action taken, and lessons learned. Equipment was available to meet people’s needs and to help maintain their independence. Staff spoke positively about working at the service, management and the people they cared for. They were attentive and treated people with kindness and compassion. People, relatives and staff were consulted and asked to give their feedback about service provision. We have asked the provider for an action plan in response to the concerns found at this inspection.

  • Safe No rating
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive No rating
  • Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary
  1. Safe

    No rating

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. ​ At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has remained requires improvement.

    The service was in breach of legal regulations in relation to safe care and treatment and staffing.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.At our last inspection we rated this key question good. At this inspection the rating has remained good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the service involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    No rating

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the service met people’s needs.At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this inspection the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant people’s needs were not always met.

  5. Well-led

    No rating

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has remained requires improvement.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to good governance and record keeping.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 18 June 2025. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Responsive was rated Requires improvement on 18 June 2025. Ask to see how care plans are kept up to date, how complaints are handled and what activities are on offer.
  3. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 18 June 2025. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.

Registration details

Registered manager
Cheryl Tobin
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

7 inspection reports, latest 4 January 2023. Latest assessment published 18 June 2025; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
02236368 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from North Tyneside Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does The Old Vicarage Care Home provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists The Old Vicarage Care Home as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does The Old Vicarage Care Home have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 36 beds at The Old Vicarage Care Home.
When was The Old Vicarage Care Home last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for The Old Vicarage Care Home was published on 18 June 2025.
Who runs The Old Vicarage Care Home?
The Old Vicarage Care Home is run by SVP Health Care Limited.
What is The Old Vicarage Care Home's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 18 June 2025.

Contact

Address
2 Waterville Road, North Shields, NE29 6SL Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Collingwood Court (Outstanding, 0.4 miles away) and Princes Court (Good, 0.5 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. O
    Collingwood Court Outstanding, 0.4 miles away
  2. G
    Princes Court Good, 0.5 miles away
  3. –
    Kingfisher House Not yet rated, 0.6 miles away
  4. G
    Appleby Good, 0.6 miles away
  5. RI
    Primrose Lodge Care Home Requires improvement, 0.7 miles away

See all care homes in North Tyneside

See all care homes in North Shields