Rated Care Homes

Seahaven

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 5 ratings

    First rated Good in 2017, most recently Requires improvement in June 2023.

  • 3 years

    since the latest rating was published. A rating this old may not show how the service is today.

  • 89 of 445

    rated care homes in Kent are rated Requires improvement, like this one.

Seahaven: inspection record

Care home, 19 beds, Kent

Rated Requires improvement in June 2023.

Seahaven: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Glendale Lodge (Good, 0.5 miles away) and Bradfield Residential Home (Good, 0.9 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    Glendale Lodge Good, 0.5 miles away
  2. G
    Bradfield Residential Home Good, 0.9 miles away
  3. G
    Meadowside Good, 0.9 miles away
  4. G
    Generals Meadow Good, 1 mile away
  5. I
    St Anselm's Nursing Home Inadequate, 1 mile away

See all care homes in Kent

See all care homes in Kingsdown

About the service

From the Care Quality Commission's inspection report published 21 June 2023. Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Seahaven is a residential care home providing personal care to up to 19 people who have a learning disability and or autism. The service was delivered in 2 adjoining houses, registered as a single location. At the time of our inspection, one house accommodated 11 people and 6 people lived in the other. Most people who used the service received support with personal care. This is help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where people receive this support, we also consider any wider social care provided.

What inspectors found

Right Support: Risks to people were identified and there was full guidance in place to mitigate the risks. However, staff did not always follow the guidance and failed to report to management when incidents occurred. This meant that appropriate actions were not taken to mitigate the risks.

Read the rest of CQC's summary

Staff supported people with their medicines in a way that promoted their independence and achieved the best possible health outcome. However, when people were prescribed 'as and when' medicines for when they were distressed there was no guidance in place to make sure these medicines were given consistently and safely. At night there were times when people might have to wait to receive their 'as and when' medicines as not all staff were trained to administer medicines.

People were supported by staff who understood best practice in relation to the wide range of strengths, impairments or sensitivities people with a learning disability and/or autistic people may have. People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

Staff were recruited safely and there was enough staff deployed to ensure people received the care and support they needed when they needed it.

People were assisted to achieve their aspirations and goals. Staff focused on people's strengths and abilities to learn and develop new skills. People pursued their chosen interests.

Right Culture:

Quality assurance systems were in place to monitor the service people received. However, they had not identified the shortfalls we found at this inspection regarding risk assessments and medicines.

People led inclusive and empowered lives because of the ethos, values, attitudes and behaviours of the management and staff. Staff placed people's wishes, needs and rights at the heart of everything they did. The stable management and core staff team supported people to receive consistent care from staff who knew them well. People received compassionate and empowering care which was tailored to their needs. People and those important to them, were involved in planning their care. People's relatives felt that there was good communication, and they were kept informed of any changes to people's wellbeing.

Staff evaluated the quality of support provided to people, involving the person, their families and other professionals as appropriate. All the relative we had contact with were complimentary and positive about the service and the care and support their loved ones received.

Right Care People were treated with kindness and care. Staff showed genuine affection in their approach. Staff knew people well. Day to day choices were offered to people and staff demonstrated a good understanding of people. Some people were not always encouraged to take an active role with tasks such as making meals and helping around the service. At times staff did things for people and not with them. Staff protected and respected people's privacy and dignity. They understood and responded to their individual needs.

Staff understood how to protect people from poor care and abuse. People indicated and said they felt safe living at Seahaven. We observed people to be relaxed in the company of staff. Safeguarding concerns had been responded to promptly. Staff had training on how to recognise and report abuse and they knew how to apply it.

Staff promoted equality and diversity in their support for people. They understood people's cultural needs and provided culturally appropriate care. People could communicate with staff and understand information given to them because staff supported them consistently and understood their individual communication needs.

People's care, treatment and support promoted their wellbeing and enjoyment of life.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 21 June 2023. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 21 June 2023. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
  3. The last rating is 3 years old. Ask what has changed since then.

Registration details

Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

12 inspection reports, latest 21 June 2023. The reports are on the Care Quality Commission website.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
02768075 (opens Companies House)

Optima Care Limited runs 5 services, all in the South East. 0 are rated Good or Outstanding, 4 are rated Requires improvement or Inadequate and 1 has no rating yet.

Other services run by Optima Care Limited

  1. RI
    Bon Secours Requires improvement. Care home, Kent
  2. RI
    Eastry House Requires improvement. Care home, Kent
  3. RI
    The Chilterns Requires improvement. Care home with nursing, Kent
  4. –
    The Meadows Not yet rated. Care home with nursing, Kent

Getting help from Kent County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Seahaven provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Seahaven as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Seahaven have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 19 beds at Seahaven.
When was Seahaven last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Seahaven was published on 21 June 2023.
Who runs Seahaven?
Seahaven is run by Optima Care Limited. It runs 5 services, all in the South East.
What is Seahaven's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 21 June 2023.

Contact

Phone
01304 364704
Address
110 Wellington Parade, Kingsdown, Deal, CT14 8AF Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Glendale Lodge (Good, 0.5 miles away) and Bradfield Residential Home (Good, 0.9 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    Glendale Lodge Good, 0.5 miles away
  2. G
    Bradfield Residential Home Good, 0.9 miles away
  3. G
    Meadowside Good, 0.9 miles away
  4. G
    Generals Meadow Good, 1 mile away
  5. I
    St Anselm's Nursing Home Inadequate, 1 mile away

See all care homes in Kent

See all care homes in Kingsdown