Rated Care Homes

Bon Secours

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 3 ratings

    Its last inspection moved it down from Good to Requires improvement.

  • 5 years

    since the latest rating was published. A rating this old may not show how the service is today.

  • 89 of 445

    rated care homes in Kent are rated Requires improvement, like this one.

Bon Secours: inspection record

Care home, 3 beds, Kent

Rated Requires improvement in June 2021, down from Good.

Bon Secours: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Cameron Lodge (Good, 0.1 miles away) and St Winifreds Care Centre (Good, 0.2 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    Cameron Lodge Good, 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    St Winifreds Care Centre Good, 0.2 miles away
  3. G
    Brook Lodge Good, 0.4 miles away
  4. RI
    Sholden Hall Residential Home Requires improvement, 0.5 miles away
  5. G
    Westbury House Good, 0.6 miles away

See all care homes in Kent

About the service

From the Care Quality Commission's inspection report published 25 June 2021. Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Bon Secours is a residential care home providing care for up to three people. At the time of our inspection, the service supported three people who were living with a learning disability, two of whom are also supported with their mental health. Two people who used the service received support with personal care. This is help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where people received this support, we also considered any wider social care provided.

What inspectors found

People told us they felt safe, they were happy living at Bon Secours and liked the staff who supported them.

Read the rest of CQC's summary

The premises looked clean and tidy and had controls in place to minimise the risks posed by COVID-19. However, the provider was sharing some staff between two locations run by the same registered manager and operated by the same provider. This was contrary to current guidance and following the inspection the provider was told to stop this practice.

People received care and support personalised to their individual needs and suited to their communication preferences. Risks had been identified and care plans mostly provided guidance how to minimise risk. When pointed out to them, the registered manager gathered more information for people who may be at risk of epileptic episodes. Staff had received training about how to meet people's needs and how to identify areas of concern.

The registered manager had identified outstanding notifications of events which should have been sent to CQC, when they had occurred. These were retrospectively submitted to us before this inspection. However, this had not permitted our oversight of events at the service as and when they occurred; without notification, CQC would not have known to take action if required. This demonstrated a lack of effective oversight and systems within the service.

Medicines were stored and managed safely; people received their medicines as prescribed. Guidance set out when 'as and when needed' (PRN) medicines should be given. However, administration of some PRN medicine was not always recorded in line with the protocol relating to it. The registered manager reviewed and revised this process immediately following the inspection.

Staff told us how they would recognise signs of abuse and the actions needed if abuse was suspected. There were enough staff to provide safe care. Safe recruitment checks were completed to ensure staff were suitable to work with people.

The registered manager had a clear vision for the service and had developed an action plan for ways to improve the service.

The service was able to demonstrate how they were meeting the underpinning principles of Right support, right care, right culture.

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice. People's support focused on them having as many opportunities as possible for them to gain new skills and become more independent.

Right support: • The model of care and setting maximised people's choice, control and Independence.

Right care: • Care was person-centred and promoted people's dignity, privacy and human Rights.

Right culture: • Ethos, values, attitudes and behaviours of leaders and care staff ensured people using services could lead confident, inclusive and empowered lives.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 25 June 2021. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 25 June 2021. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
  3. The last rating is 5 years old. Ask what has changed since then.

Registration details

Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

7 inspection reports, latest 25 June 2021. The reports are on the Care Quality Commission website.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
02768075 (opens Companies House)

Optima Care Limited runs 5 services, all in the South East. 0 are rated Good or Outstanding, 4 are rated Requires improvement or Inadequate and 1 has no rating yet.

Other services run by Optima Care Limited

  1. RI
    Eastry House Requires improvement. Care home, Kent
  2. RI
    Seahaven Requires improvement. Care home, Kent
  3. RI
    The Chilterns Requires improvement. Care home with nursing, Kent
  4. –
    The Meadows Not yet rated. Care home with nursing, Kent

Getting help from Kent County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Bon Secours provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Bon Secours as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Bon Secours have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 3 beds at Bon Secours.
When was Bon Secours last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Bon Secours was published on 25 June 2021.
Who runs Bon Secours?
Bon Secours is run by Optima Care Limited. It runs 5 services, all in the South East.
What is Bon Secours's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 25 June 2021.

Contact

Phone
01304 366325
Address
250 Middle Deal Road, Deal, CT14 9SW Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Cameron Lodge (Good, 0.1 miles away) and St Winifreds Care Centre (Good, 0.2 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    Cameron Lodge Good, 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    St Winifreds Care Centre Good, 0.2 miles away
  3. G
    Brook Lodge Good, 0.4 miles away
  4. RI
    Sholden Hall Residential Home Requires improvement, 0.5 miles away
  5. G
    Westbury House Good, 0.6 miles away

See all care homes in Kent