Sholden Hall Residential Home
- Care home
- 27 beds
- No nursing
- Dementia care
- Registered since 2022
- Kent, South East
Requires improvement
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
At a glance
3 ratings
Its last inspection improved it from Inadequate to Requires improvement.
5 months
since the latest rating was published.
89 of 445
rated care homes in Kent are rated Requires improvement, like this one.
Sholden Hall Residential Home: inspection record
Rated Requires improvement in May 2026, up from Inadequate.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Compare nearby
Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: St Winifreds Care Centre (Good, 0.4 miles away) and Cameron Lodge (Good, 0.6 miles away).
Nearest care homes:
- G St Winifreds Care Centre Good, 0.4 miles away
- RI Bon Secours Requires improvement, 0.5 miles away
- G Cameron Lodge Good, 0.6 miles away
- G Brook Lodge Good, 0.9 miles away
- O The Goodwins Outstanding, 1.1 miles away
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 22 May 2026 (assessment visit 19 December 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
Date of assessment: 9 February to 23 February 2026. The service is a residential care home supporting up to 27 older people, some who were living with dementia. At our last assessment we identified breaches of regulation in relation to safe care, good governance, safeguarding and employment of fit and proper people. We issued warning notices in relation to safe care and good governance. We completed this assessment to check the provider had taken action to address the breaches and found improvements had been made.
- Safe No rating
- Effective Good
- Caring Good
- Responsive Good
- Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary
The provider had complied with the warning notices and the breaches in relation to safe care and treatment, safeguarding and employment of fit and proper people had been met. However, we found there continued to be a breach of good governance.
There was a new manager who had been in post 2 months at the time of our assessment who was in the process of starting their registration with CQC. They had prioritised improvements related to the warning notices and keeping people safe, they acknowledged further improvements were needed. Concerns relating to infection control and the environment included, chipped tiles in rooms, or tiles which were falling off the wall. There was furniture which was chipped and peeling which could not be cleaned effectively. The manager had completed an audit of the service and identified some shortfalls. However, they had not compiled an action plan to show how they were going to rectify the shortfalls. The provider had completed regular checks but had not identified the shortfalls found by our assessment or the manager. Following the assessment, the provider had replaced the tiles and some furniture.
People were now protected from potential harm, abuse and discrimination. Staff understood their role to report concerns and were confident they would be acted upon. Potential risks to people’s health and welfare had been assessed and there were detailed person-centred guidance for staff to mitigate risks. There had been improvements in the management of medicines, however, some of the records were not always accurate. There were enough staff to meet people’s needs. Staff had received training and supervision; the manager had started to complete competency assessments. There had been no new staff employed since the last assessment, but the manager had reviewed staff recruitment files to make sure all the required information had been obtained.
People’s capacity had been assessed and detailed in their care plans, staff supported people following the principles of the Mental Capacity Act. Staff referred people to healthcare professionals when their needs changed and had followed the guidance given.
This service has been in Special Measures since 11 November 2025. The provider demonstrated improvements had been made. The service is no longer rated as Inadequate overall or in any of the key questions. Therefore, this service is no longer in Special Measures.
-
Safe
No rating
Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.
At our last assessment we rated this key question inadequate. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed.
-
Effective
Good
Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.
At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.
-
Caring
Good
Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.
-
Responsive
Good
Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met.
-
Well-led
No rating
Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.
At our last assessment we rated this key question inadequate. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care.
There was a breach of regulation in relation to good governance.
Questions to ask when you visit
- Safe was rated Requires improvement on 22 May 2026. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
- Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 22 May 2026. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
- Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
Registration details
- Registered manager
- Amanda May
- Registered with the CQC since
- What it provides
- Care home service without nursing
- Who it supports
- Dementia, Older People, Younger Adults
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)1 inspection report, latest 24 May 2023. Latest assessment published 22 May 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.
The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
- Provider
- Good Shepherd Care Limited
- Ownership type
- Organisation
- Companies House number
- 12174936 (opens Companies House)
Getting help from Kent County Council
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at Kent County Council
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 03000 41 61 61, Monday to Friday, 9am to 5pm
- Contact adult social care online
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: Kent County Council
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does Sholden Hall Residential Home provide nursing care?
- No. The Care Quality Commission lists Sholden Hall Residential Home as a care home without nursing.
- How many beds does Sholden Hall Residential Home have?
- The Care Quality Commission's register lists 27 beds at Sholden Hall Residential Home.
- When was Sholden Hall Residential Home last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Sholden Hall Residential Home was published on 22 May 2026.
- Who runs Sholden Hall Residential Home?
- Sholden Hall Residential Home is run by Good Shepherd Care Limited.
- What is Sholden Hall Residential Home's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 22 May 2026.
Contact
- Phone
- 01304 375445
- Address
- Sholden Hall, London Road, Sholden, Deal, CT14 0AB Map (opens Google Maps)
Compare nearby
Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: St Winifreds Care Centre (Good, 0.4 miles away) and Cameron Lodge (Good, 0.6 miles away).
Nearest care homes:
- G St Winifreds Care Centre Good, 0.4 miles away
- RI Bon Secours Requires improvement, 0.5 miles away
- G Cameron Lodge Good, 0.6 miles away
- G Brook Lodge Good, 0.9 miles away
- O The Goodwins Outstanding, 1.1 miles away