Rated Care Homes

The Lodge

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 6 ratings

    Its last inspection improved it from Requires improvement to Good.

  • 3 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 149 of 181

    rated care homes in North Yorkshire are rated Good, like this one.

The Lodge: inspection record

Care home, 38 beds, North Yorkshire

Rated Good in July 2026, up from Requires improvement.

The Lodge: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. RI
    Norwood House Requires improvement, 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    St Bernadettes Nursing Home Good, 0.1 miles away
  3. G
    St. Cecilia's Nursing Home Good, 0.2 miles away
  4. G
    Beechwood Nursing Home Good, 0.2 miles away
  5. RI
    Marina Lodge Requires improvement, 0.3 miles away

See all care homes in North Yorkshire

See all care homes in Scarborough

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 8 July 2026 (assessment visit 9 April 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of Assessment: 29 April 2026 to 22 May 2026.


The service is a residential care home providing support to older people, including some people living with a dementia. At the time of our inspection 29 people were living at this service and receiving a regulated activity.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary


Overall, people received safe, caring and effective support. The provider had made clear improvements since the last inspection, particularly in addressing previous safety concerns. The provider was previously in breach of the legal regulation in relation to good governance. Further work was required to ensure improvements were consistently embedded and sustained.


The quality of care had improved since the last inspection, particularly in relation to safety. At the previous inspection, the provider was in breach of the legal regulation in relation to risk management and medicines systems. At this inspection, systems were in place to assess and manage risks, and people generally received their medicines safely. Staff demonstrated good knowledge of people’s needs, and care was delivered in a safe and responsive way. This showed the provider had taken action to address previous concerns and improve the delivery of safe care and treatment.


People were supported by kind and attentive staff who understood their needs and preferences. Observations and feedback indicated people were treated with dignity and respect, and staff responded promptly to requests for support. Partnership working with health professionals had improved, with staff seeking advice appropriately and responding to changes in people’s needs.

However, improvements were not yet fully embedded. While care was generally delivered safely and effectively, this was not always supported by accurate and consistent documentation. Care plans, risk assessments and monitoring records did not always reflect people’s current needs or the care being delivered.


Governance and oversight systems were not always effective. Although audits and monitoring processes were in place, and had improved since our last inspection, they had not identified all the issues found during this inspection, including inconsistencies in care planning, medicines monitoring and record keeping. This demonstrated that systems to assess, monitor and improve the quality and safety of the service were not operating as effectively as they could.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant overall, people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    No rating

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has remained requires improvement. This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care.

    The service was in breach of the legal regulation in relation to the governance and oversight at this service.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 8 July 2026. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
  2. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  3. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Julia Anderson
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

9 inspection reports, latest 11 August 2023. Latest assessment published 8 July 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
04305291 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from North Yorkshire Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does The Lodge provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists The Lodge as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does The Lodge have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 38 beds at The Lodge.
When was The Lodge last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for The Lodge was published on 8 July 2026.
Who runs The Lodge?
The Lodge is run by Hamilton Care Limited.
What is The Lodge's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 8 July 2026.

Contact

Phone
01723 374800
Address
Westbourne Road, Scarborough, YO11 2SP Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. RI
    Norwood House Requires improvement, 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    St Bernadettes Nursing Home Good, 0.1 miles away
  3. G
    St. Cecilia's Nursing Home Good, 0.2 miles away
  4. G
    Beechwood Nursing Home Good, 0.2 miles away
  5. RI
    Marina Lodge Requires improvement, 0.3 miles away

See all care homes in North Yorkshire

See all care homes in Scarborough