Rated Care Homes

Chaxhill Hall

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 4 ratings

    First rated Good in 2015, most recently Requires improvement in December 2022.

  • 4 years

    since the latest rating was published. A rating this old may not show how the service is today.

  • 25 of 184

    rated care homes in Gloucestershire are rated Requires improvement, like this one.

Chaxhill Hall: inspection record

Care home, 36 beds, Gloucestershire

Rated Requires improvement in December 2022.

Chaxhill Hall: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Gatwick Rise (Good, 0.5 miles away) and Dean Grange (Good, 2.1 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    Gatwick Rise Good, 0.5 miles away
  2. G
    Dean Grange Good, 2.1 miles away
  3. RI
    Stepping Stones Requires improvement, 2.3 miles away
  4. G
    Riverside House Good, 2.4 miles away
  5. G
    Orchard End Good, 2.9 miles away

See all care homes in Gloucestershire

See all care homes in Broadoak

About the service

From the Care Quality Commission's inspection report published 16 December 2022. Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Chaxhill Hall is a residential care home providing accommodation and personal care up to a maximum of 36 people. The service provides support to older people, some of whom live with dementia. At the time of our inspection there were 30 people using the service. People were accommodated in one adapted building.

What inspectors found

Medicines had not always been administered as prescribed and processes designed to support safe medicines management had not always been followed by the staff. Although no-one had been harmed, the failure to identify shortfalls in safe practice and process, had put people at risk. During the inspection immediate action was taken to prevent further shortfalls and more frequent monitoring of staff practice was put into place to ensure correct procedures were followed.

Read the rest of CQC's summary

We found since our last inspection, improvements made to several other aspects of medicines management. People told us they were provided with support to take their medicines.

The provider had made improvements in how they quality monitored the service which the registered manager had found supportive. We also found improvement to how areas of the service were audited, but also found gaps in the completion of the audits. Time was needed for these to be used more effectively so they could robustly support, an already improving system, to maintain compliance and service improvement.

Safeguarding processes had been reviewed to ensure the reporting of safeguarding concerns, to the local authority and other relevant agencies took place in a timely manner. There were now arrangements in place to ensure appropriate investigation and action took place in response to safeguarding concerns. People told us they felt safe and people's representatives told us their relatives were looked after safely.

Improvements had been made to ensure risks to people were assessed in a timely manner and action taken to reduce these. Staff had been supported to understand their roles and responsibilities regarding risk management. A new care records system had been implemented to ensure risk assessments and associated care plans were detailed and regularly reviewed for staff reference. We observed some arrangements put into place to help people remain safe, which included the use of technology such as alarmed sensor mats and specialised equipment.

Improvement had been made to the cleaning arrangements and to infection, prevention and control practices. Staff were following national guidance regarding the use of face masks and other personal, protective, equipment (PPE) to prevent the spread of infection. People told us their bedrooms were cleaned daily and they had been supported to have Flu and COVID-19 vaccinations. There were no visiting restrictions and visitors were being supported to visit their relatives and friends safely.

Arrangements were in place to keep the environment secure and safe for people who lived with dementia. We observed staff supporting people skilfully, who sometimes became distressed due to dementia, to stay safe and regain a better state of wellbeing.

The registered manager was visible to people who used the service and their visitors. Relatives described them as 'helpful' and 'easy to talk with'. Staff appreciated the support and leadership they provided and felt positive and invested in the service. Feedback was sought from relatives and people to support service improvement. Learning had been taken from past inspections, complaints, concerns raised and errors to help develop staff practice.

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 16 December 2022. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 16 December 2022. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
  3. The last rating is 4 years old. Ask what has changed since then.

Registration details

Registered manager
Portia Brown
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Mental Health, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

10 inspection reports, latest 16 December 2022. The reports are on the Care Quality Commission website.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Partnership

Getting help from Gloucestershire County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Chaxhill Hall provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Chaxhill Hall as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Chaxhill Hall have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 36 beds at Chaxhill Hall.
When was Chaxhill Hall last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Chaxhill Hall was published on 16 December 2022.
Who runs Chaxhill Hall?
Chaxhill Hall is run by Mr & Mrs P A Whitehouse.
What is Chaxhill Hall's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 16 December 2022.

Contact

Phone
01452 760717
Address
Chaxhill, Nr Westbury on Severn, GL14 1QW Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Gatwick Rise (Good, 0.5 miles away) and Dean Grange (Good, 2.1 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    Gatwick Rise Good, 0.5 miles away
  2. G
    Dean Grange Good, 2.1 miles away
  3. RI
    Stepping Stones Requires improvement, 2.3 miles away
  4. G
    Riverside House Good, 2.4 miles away
  5. G
    Orchard End Good, 2.9 miles away

See all care homes in Gloucestershire

See all care homes in Broadoak