Rated Care Homes

Calvert House

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 3 ratings

    Rated Good at every inspection since 2017.

  • 1 month

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 306 of 381

    rated care homes in Lancashire are rated Good, like this one.

Calvert House: inspection record

Care home, 8 beds, Lancashire

Rated Good in September 2026.

Calvert House: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Reiver House Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    The Meadows Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  3. G
    The Barn Good, 0.1 miles away
  4. G
    Lostock Grove Rest Home Good, 0.3 miles away
  5. G

See all care homes in Lancashire

See all care homes in Leyland

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 16 September 2026 (assessment visit 2 July 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment: 22 July 2026. This assessment was partly prompted by concerns around safety raised by a person who had previously used the service, although they had not been in receipt of a regulated activity. We reviewed those areas of concern and did not find evidence of risk.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

Calvert House is registered to provide accommodation for up to 8 people who require nursing or personal care. The service supports younger adults, including people who may have a substance use disorder and those living with mental health challenges.The service is also registered to provide accommodation with nursing or personal care for people with sensory impairments, learning disabilities, autistic spectrum disorder, and/or physical disabilities.

At the time of our assessment, 7 people were living at Calvert House. Of these, 1 person was receiving a regulated activity, and they chose not to participate in this assessment.

People had enough to eat and drink to stay healthy. Staff worked with all agencies involved in people’s care for the best outcomes. They monitored people’s health and consulted with health professionals to support healthy living.

Staff were recruited safely and received the training and support they needed to conduct their roles effectively. The home was clean[GS1][EH2], and systems were in place to support effective infection prevention and control. Medicines were managed and administered safely.

Staff were caring and respectful in their approach and understood people's individual needs and preferences. People were encouraged to maintain their independence and make choices about how they wished to spend their time. They were supported to develop relationships, pursue interests, take part in activities, and had the option to participate or not.

People received person-centred care based on assessments of their health, wellbeing, communication, and support needs. Staff knew people well and were able to respond in a timely manner to changes in their clinical, emotional, and behavioural needs.

Staff treated people with kindness, dignity, and respect. Interactions were positive and focused on people's individual wishes and preferences. Care plans reflected what was important to people and provided guidance on how staff should support them to achieve their goals and aspirations.

The registered manager was visible within the service, knowledgeable and demonstrated a commitment to achieving positive outcomes for people. Staff spoke positively about the support they received and the provider’s investment in their wellbeing, development, and career progression. Governance systems and quality assurance processes were in place to monitor the quality of care, identify areas for improvement and support the ongoing development of the service.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  2. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Samantha Mcginnigle
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Mental Health, People who misuse drugs and alcohol, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

3 inspection reports, latest 25 September 2019. Latest assessment published 16 September 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
Voyage 1 LimitedBrand: Voyage
Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
02215899 (opens Companies House)

Voyage 1 Limited runs 278 services in England, 16 of them in the North West. 239 are rated Good or Outstanding, 24 are rated Requires improvement or Inadequate and 15 have no rating yet.

Other services run by Voyage 1 Limited

  1. O
    1 Sheringham Avenue Outstanding. Care home, Enfield, London
  2. O
    23 Cecil Road Outstanding. Care home, Derbyshire, East Midlands
  3. O
    4 Pages Orchard Outstanding. Care home, Oxfordshire, South East
  4. O
    Bewick House Outstanding. Care home, Darlington, North East

See all 278 services run by Voyage 1 Limited

Getting help from Lancashire County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Calvert House provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Calvert House as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Calvert House have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 8 beds at Calvert House.
When was Calvert House last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Calvert House was published on 16 September 2026.
Who runs Calvert House?
Calvert House is run by Voyage 1 Limited. It runs 278 services in England, 16 of them in the North West.
What is Calvert House's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 16 September 2026.

Contact

Phone
01772 459978
Address
Mill Lane, Leyland, PR25 1HY Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Reiver House Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    The Meadows Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  3. G
    The Barn Good, 0.1 miles away
  4. G
    Lostock Grove Rest Home Good, 0.3 miles away
  5. G

See all care homes in Lancashire

See all care homes in Leyland