Rated Care Homes

Parkview Care Home

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 7 ratings

    Its last inspection improved it from Requires improvement to Good.

  • 1 month

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 72 of 83

    rated care homes in Brighton and Hove are rated Good, like this one.

Parkview Care Home: inspection record

Care home, 10 beds, Brighton and Hove

Rated Good in September 2026, up from Requires improvement.

Parkview Care Home: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. RI
    Asher Nursing Home Requires improvement, 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Wilbury Gardens Good, 0.1 miles away
  3. G
    Regent House Nursing Home Good, 0.1 miles away
  4. G
    Crescent House Good, 0.1 miles away
  5. G
    Downlands Good, 0.1 miles away

See all care homes in Brighton and Hove

See all care homes in Hove

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 14 September 2026 (assessment visit 9 July 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment 14 July to 5 August 2026.

Parkview care home provides accommodation and personal care to younger adults and people with mental health conditions. Not everyone living at Parkview was being supported with the regulated activity of personal care. We only comment on the care of people receiving personal care, as this is the regulated activity we assess.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

A registered manager was in place, who was committed to the ongoing improvement of people’s experience and the support they receive. The registered manager acknowledged some areas of care delivery needed further development but had made significant progress in several areas including staff development and training compliance.

The provider had systems in place to assess people’s needs and the quality-of-care delivery, whilst we identified some shortfalls in the process of reviewing peoples care plans staff knew the needs of the people they were supporting who spoke about the positive outcomes they experienced.

Incidents, accidents and complaints were being recorded and investigated by the registered manager in line with the providers policy. People told us they were happy with their support, and had their choices respected and promoted by kind, caring staff who understood their needs and promoted their independence. Staff demonstrated a good knowledge of people’s rights to make their own choices, understanding the principles of the Mental Capacity Act (MCA) 2005 and promoting independence.

Staff had received training to fulfil their roles and develop the skills needed to support peoples’ specific conditions; this included the providers mandatory online courses alongside additional in person courses the registered manager had sourced which included managing people’s anxiety, learning disability awareness and supporting autistic people among others.

We observed staff treating people with dignity and respect, who were confident in their roles and described the leadership culture as open, in which they could raise concerns and believed action would be taken to address their concerns.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  2. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Carmen Toth-Kalocsai
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Mental Health, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

8 inspection reports, latest 13 July 2023. Latest assessment published 14 September 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
03699449 (opens Companies House)

Parkview Care Homes Limited runs 2 services, all in the South East. 1 is rated Good or Outstanding and 1 is rated Requires improvement or Inadequate.

Other services run by Parkview Care Homes Limited

  1. RI
    Asher Nursing Home Requires improvement. Care home with nursing, Brighton and Hove

Getting help from Brighton and Hove City Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Parkview Care Home provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Parkview Care Home as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Parkview Care Home have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 10 beds at Parkview Care Home.
When was Parkview Care Home last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Parkview Care Home was published on 14 September 2026.
Who runs Parkview Care Home?
Parkview Care Home is run by Parkview Care Homes Limited. It runs 2 services, all in the South East.
What is Parkview Care Home's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 14 September 2026.

Contact

Phone
01273 720120
Address
70 Old Shoreham Road, Hove, BN3 6HJ Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. RI
    Asher Nursing Home Requires improvement, 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Wilbury Gardens Good, 0.1 miles away
  3. G
    Regent House Nursing Home Good, 0.1 miles away
  4. G
    Crescent House Good, 0.1 miles away
  5. G
    Downlands Good, 0.1 miles away

See all care homes in Brighton and Hove

See all care homes in Hove