Rated Care Homes

Eastfield

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 4 ratings

    Its last inspection improved it from Inadequate to Good.

  • 14 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 332 of 445

    rated care homes in Kent are rated Good, like this one.

Eastfield: inspection record

Care home, 43 beds, Kent

Rated Good in August 2025, up from Inadequate.

Eastfield: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Cavell Park Care Home Good, 0.5 miles away
  2. RI
    Maidstone Care Centre Requires improvement, 0.5 miles away
  3. G
    Glenhurst Lodge Good, 0.5 miles away
  4. –
    Invicta Court Not yet rated, 0.8 miles away
  5. G
    Aspen House Good, 1.1 miles away

See all care homes in Kent

See all care homes in Maidstone

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 14 August 2025 (assessment visit 25 June 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

We carried out this inspection to Eastfield on 30 July 2025. Eastfield is a care home providing personal care and accommodation for up to 43 people, some of whom have a health condition or are living with dementia. At our last inspection, we found breaches of regulations relating to safe care and treatment, safeguarding, staffing, the need for consent, person-centred care, dignity and respect and good governance at the service. We placed conditions on the provider’s registration meaning they could not admit anyone new to the service without the agreement of the Care Quality Commission. We also took additional enforcement action. This inspection was carried out to see if the service had improved in the way the provider had told us it had and that the provider was no longer in breach of these regulations. We found a marked changed in the service which had resulted in a positive impact on staff and an improved culture. Staff said they felt things had improved significantly since our last inspection. They told us they took more time in the way they cared for people and were more conscious of how they interacted with them. Staff told us how much they enjoyed working at the service and that they felt fully supported by management who were approachable, proactive and listened. We found sufficient staff on duty throughout our inspection which meant people did not have to wait for care. Staff had received the necessary training for the role resulting in a confident and competent workforce. Medicines practices were safe and staff worked closely with external health professionals to help ensure people received appropriate care from across various services when they needed it. Staff had undergone safeguarding training and put this training into practice. They demonstrated a good knowledge of which types of concerns needed reporting. Staff took time to get to know people and understood the need to obtain consent or make decisions in a person’s best interests should they lack capacity. This service has been in Special Measures since 18 October 2024. The provider demonstrated improvements have been made. The service is no longer rated as inadequate overall or in any of the key questions. Therefore, this service is no longer in Special Measures.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary
  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question Inadequate. At this assessment the rating has changed to Good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question Requires Improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to Good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question Requires Improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to Good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question Requires Improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to Good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question Inadequate. At this assessment the rating has changed to Good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  2. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Lauren Traveller
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

7 inspection reports, latest 22 June 2018. Latest assessment published 14 August 2025; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
Bureaucom LimitedBrand: Nicholas James and Regal Care Trading Limited
Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
01648028 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Kent County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Eastfield provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Eastfield as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Eastfield have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 43 beds at Eastfield.
When was Eastfield last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Eastfield was published on 14 August 2025.
Who runs Eastfield?
Eastfield is run by Bureaucom Limited.
What is Eastfield's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 14 August 2025.

Contact

Phone
01622 755153
Address
76 Sittingbourne Road, Maidstone, ME14 5HY Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Cavell Park Care Home Good, 0.5 miles away
  2. RI
    Maidstone Care Centre Requires improvement, 0.5 miles away
  3. G
    Glenhurst Lodge Good, 0.5 miles away
  4. –
    Invicta Court Not yet rated, 0.8 miles away
  5. G
    Aspen House Good, 1.1 miles away

See all care homes in Kent

See all care homes in Maidstone