Vine House Older Persons Residence
- Care home
- 17 beds
- No nursing
- Dementia care
- Registered since 2014
- West Sussex, South East
Good
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
At a glance
3 ratings
Rated Good at every inspection since 2016.
12 months
since the latest rating was published.
250 of 309
rated care homes in West Sussex are rated Good, like this one.
Vine House Older Persons Residence: inspection record
Rated Good in October 2025.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Compare nearby
- G Pendean House Care Home Good, 1.4 miles away
- G Rotherlea Good, 5.3 miles away
- G St Magnus Hospital and St Magnus Nursing Good, 5.4 miles away
- RI Barlavington Manor Requires improvement, 5.6 miles away
- G Weyspring Park Good, 5.8 miles away
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 29 October 2025 (assessment visit 3 September 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
Date of Assessment: 16 September to 10 October 2025
Vine house older persons residence is a 'care home' that provides accommodation for older people, some of whom require support with their personal care needs.
- Safe Good
- Effective Good
- Caring Good
- Responsive Good
- Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary
This home is not required by condition of registration to employ a manager registered with CQC. However, the provider chooses to do so. There had been 4 managers in the past 3 years, which had caused some disruption in the governance of the home. The provider has appointed another manager and is awaiting checks and a start date.
The home was not always consistently and effectively managed by leaders. Changes in management, revised management structure and governance responsibilities, system changes and inconsistent delivery of quality assurance processes had meant that leaders did not always have consistent and organised oversight of the home.
Improvements were needed on the home’s approach to assessing people’s capacity while more work needed to be completed to ensure that staff had the skills and readiness to use systems effectively and maintain consistency.
Whilst there were improvements needed to governance structures, care systems, staffing and quality assurance systems, we found that this did not impact on the care being provided. Staff treated people as individuals. People were encouraged to maintain relationships with family and friends. A relative told us, “Visiting the home is very simple and the staff are always welcoming and offer a drink when I visit. I like the fact that it is relatively small which enables Vine house to have a friendly home from home vibe.”
Staff responded to people in a timely way. People received personalised care that was tailored to meet their individual needs, preferences and choices. Care plans were being updated where needed and guided staff about people's needs and how to meet them. Concerns and complaints were listened to and used to improve the home they received.
Staff provided safe, effective and responsive support. Systems and processes were in place to mitigate the risk of harm to people and to protect them from abuse. Staff understood their responsibilities in reporting potential safeguarding issues, while the provider understood their regulatory responsibilities. People were involved in the management of risk to their care and support. People were supported by enough staff. Appropriate infection control procedures were in place, and the environment was kept clean and a safe place for people to live.
People were involved in assessments of their needs which took into account people’s communication, personal, health and any equality needs. Staff made sure people understood their care and support needs which enabled them to give informed consent.
-
Safe
Good
This means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question good.
At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.
-
Effective
Good
This means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.
At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good.
This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.
-
Caring
Good
This means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good.
This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.
-
Responsive
Good
This means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good.
This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.
-
Well-led
No rating
This means we looked for evidence that home leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement.
This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care.
Questions to ask when you visit
- Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 29 October 2025. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
- Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
- Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.
Registration details
- Registered with the CQC since
- What it provides
- Care home service without nursing
- Who it supports
- Dementia, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)3 inspection reports, latest 26 February 2021. Latest assessment published 29 October 2025; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.
The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
- Provider
- Mr Andrew Kevin Hill
- Ownership type
- Individual
Getting help from West Sussex County Council
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at West Sussex County Council
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 01243 642121, Monday to Friday, 9am to 5pm
- Contact adult social care online
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: West Sussex County Council
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does Vine House Older Persons Residence provide nursing care?
- No. The Care Quality Commission lists Vine House Older Persons Residence as a care home without nursing.
- How many beds does Vine House Older Persons Residence have?
- The Care Quality Commission's register lists 17 beds at Vine House Older Persons Residence.
- When was Vine House Older Persons Residence last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Vine House Older Persons Residence was published on 29 October 2025.
- Who runs Vine House Older Persons Residence?
- Vine House Older Persons Residence is run by Mr Andrew Kevin Hill.
- What is Vine House Older Persons Residence's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 29 October 2025.
Contact
- Phone
- 01730 815441
- Address
- Vanzell Road, Easebourne Lane, Easebourne, Midhurst, GU29 9AZ Map (opens Google Maps)
Compare nearby
- G Pendean House Care Home Good, 1.4 miles away
- G Rotherlea Good, 5.3 miles away
- G St Magnus Hospital and St Magnus Nursing Good, 5.4 miles away
- RI Barlavington Manor Requires improvement, 5.6 miles away
- G Weyspring Park Good, 5.8 miles away