Rated Care Homes

Grey Gables

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 1 rating

    Only one rating on record, so there is no trend to show yet.

  • 2 years

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 306 of 381

    rated care homes in Lancashire are rated Good, like this one.

Grey Gables: inspection record

Care home, 6 beds, Lancashire

Rated Good in August 2024.

Grey Gables: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Bare Hall Residential Care Home Good, 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Craigneil Residential Home Good, 0.2 miles away
  3. G
    Springfield Lodge Good, 0.3 miles away
  4. G
    Across The Bay Good, 0.3 miles away
  5. G
    Whitelow House Nursing Home Good, 0.3 miles away

See all care homes in Lancashire

See all care homes in Morecambe

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 28 August 2024 (assessment visit 14 May 2024). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment 18 June to 22 July 2024

This was the first inspection for this newly rated service. We assessed all quality statements under the five key questions of Safe, Effective, Caring, Responsive and Well Led as good. We found the service provided high quality person-centred care which met people’s individual needs.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

People were supported to live fulfilling lives and staff supported people to partake in meaningful activity. Staff were seen to be kind and considerate to people using this service. Records relating to people’s care and support were detailed and person centred. Staff recruitment processes were robust, and staff had received training relevant to their role. Records relating to the management of this service were detailed and consideration had gone into the analysis of accidents and incidents to help reduce future risks to people. People were safeguarded from the risk of abuse and the environment had been adapted to meet people’s specific needs.

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

We have assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Systems were in place to manage safeguarding incidents and staff were trained in safeguarding people from the risk of abuse. There was a learning culture in place that identified themes, trends and lessons learned from incidents. There were sufficient numbers of suitably trained staff to meet people’s needs. The environment people lived in was safe and medicines were managed, stored and administered safely.

  2. Effective

    Good

    People’s needs were assessed, and care and support were delivered in line with current standards to achieve effective outcomes. People were supported to access healthcare services and were actively involved in their meal planning. Care records reflected this. Mental capacity assessments and best interest decisions had been completed in line with best practice. People were supported to make their own choices and staff understood the need for consent.

  3. Caring

    Good

    People and their relatives consistently told us they were supported and treated well. People were encouraged to express their views and make decisions about their care. People’s privacy, dignity and independence was respected and promoted. We observed people to be treated with kindness and compassion throughout our visit and staff were seen to talk to people with patience and consideration. People were actively encouraged to undertake meaningful activity and analysis was carried out to ensure people were doing things they enjoyed. The registered manager had a great focus on promoting staff wellbeing.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    People’s communication needs were being considered and people were being cared for in a person-centred way. Documents were available in different formats to ensure they were accessible for all. Complaints were responded to, and detailed analysis completed. Advocates were actively involved in people’s care and support. Staff felt people living at this service were happy and cared for well.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    There was a range of audits in place to monitor and improve the quality and safety of the service. The culture of the service was open, honest and positive. Staff felt the registered manager listened and acted on concerns. Staff wellbeing was actively promoted, and lessons learnt were shared during staff meetings and supervisions. Partners felt the registered manager acted on feedback and implemented changes when needed. Staff felt supported in their role and there was a range of policies in place for staff to access.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  2. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Shirley Smyth
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
13299596 (opens Companies House)

Cedar Health And Wellbeing Limited runs 8 services, all in the North West. 2 are rated Good or Outstanding and 6 have no rating yet.

Other services run by Cedar Health And Wellbeing Limited

  1. G
    Holly House Good. Care home, Lancashire
  2. –
    Cedar Health and Wellbeing Limited Not yet rated. Home care, Lancashire
  3. –
    Fulwood Lodge Not yet rated. Care home, Lancashire
  4. –
    Leyland Lane Not yet rated. Care home, Lancashire

See all 8 services run by Cedar Health And Wellbeing Limited

Getting help from Lancashire County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Grey Gables provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Grey Gables as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Grey Gables have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 6 beds at Grey Gables.
When was Grey Gables last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Grey Gables was published on 28 August 2024.
Who runs Grey Gables?
Grey Gables is run by Cedar Health And Wellbeing Limited. It runs 8 services, all in the North West.
What is Grey Gables's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 28 August 2024.

Contact

Phone
07383 895892
Address
1 Lodges Grove, Morecambe, LA4 6HE Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Bare Hall Residential Care Home Good, 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Craigneil Residential Home Good, 0.2 miles away
  3. G
    Springfield Lodge Good, 0.3 miles away
  4. G
    Across The Bay Good, 0.3 miles away
  5. G
    Whitelow House Nursing Home Good, 0.3 miles away

See all care homes in Lancashire

See all care homes in Morecambe