Rated Care Homes

Berrycroft Manor

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 5 ratings

    Its last inspection moved it down from Good to Requires improvement.

  • 10 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 15 of 56

    rated care homes in Stockport are rated Requires improvement, like this one.

Berrycroft Manor: inspection record

Care home, 78 beds, Stockport

Rated Requires improvement in January 2026, down from Good.

Berrycroft Manor: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Silverdale (Good, 0.2 miles away) and Appleton Lodge (Good, 1.2 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    Silverdale Good, 0.2 miles away
  2. RI
    Bankfield House Care Home Requires improvement, 0.9 miles away
  3. G
    Appleton Lodge Good, 1.2 miles away
  4. G
    Appleton Manor Good, 1.2 miles away
  5. RI
    Oakwood Acquired Brain Injury Rehabilitation Service Requires improvement, 1.3 miles away

See all care homes in Stockport

See all care homes in Bredbury

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 2 January 2026 (assessment visit 7 October 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment period: 20 to 29 October 2025.

Berrycroft Manor is a residential care home registered to provide accommodation and personal care for up to 78 people. The service provides support for older people and people with dementia. The home is purpose built and accommodates people within 6 units across 3 floors. At the time of this inspection, there were 68 people living at Berrycroft Manor.

  • Safe No rating
  • Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary

This inspection was prompted in part by notification of an incident following which a person using the service died. This incident is subject to further investigation by CQC as to whether any regulatory action should be taken. As a result, this inspection did not examine the circumstances of the incident. However, the information shared with CQC about the incident indicated potential concerns about the management of risk and staffing levels. This inspection examined those risks.

We found some improvements in the management of medicines since the last inspection, for example, the supporting documentation for ‘when required’ medicines should be given and staff received training and competency checks. However, we found concerns relating to the accurate recording of some medicines and the safe spacing of medicine administration. There was a breach of regulation in relation to medicines.

We found staff were kind and caring during our observations of care delivery. However, we found there was not enough care staff on duty to always respond to people’s needs in a timely way, and we found not all staff had completed training as required. We had specific concerns around night-time staffing levels. There was a breach of regulation in relation to safe staffing.

We found the home to be mostly clean, well maintained and safety checks were in place. However, on our first site visit, we found people could access some areas that may not be safe; this was rectified by the registered manager after we had reported our concerns.

People received medical attention when required and staff made appropriate referrals to healthcare professionals when needed. People had individual care plans and risk assessments in place that were person-centred; however, we found these were not always up to date or reflective of people’s immediate needs and did not always provide clear direction to meet people’s needs safely. Where people required additional monitoring actions, we found records did not always demonstrate that people were receiving care in line with their assessed needs. There was a breach of regulation in relation to individual risk management.

The management team were helpful and quick to take necessary action when we fed back our concerns during the site visits. However, systems and processes to ensure oversight of the service were not always effective. Audits completed had not always identified the concerns we found on inspection. We received mixed feedback from people and staff about the management of the service, and we were not always assured that actions had been taken when concerns had been raised. There was a breach of regulation in relation to governance and oversight of the service.

We have asked the provider for an action plan in response to the breaches found at this inspection.

  1. Safe

    No rating

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed.

    The service was in breach of two legal regulations in relation to safe staffing, the safety of people’s medicines and individual risk management.

  2. Well-led

    No rating

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to governance at the service.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 2 January 2026. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 2 January 2026. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
  3. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.

Registration details

Registered manager
Michael Blissett
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

8 inspection reports, latest 16 September 2022. Latest assessment published 2 January 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
06969431 (opens Companies House)

Finbrook Limited runs 2 services, all in the North West. 1 is rated Good or Outstanding and 1 is rated Requires improvement or Inadequate.

Other services run by Finbrook Limited

  1. G
    Beechwood Lodge Good. Care home, Rochdale

Getting help from Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Berrycroft Manor provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Berrycroft Manor as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Berrycroft Manor have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 78 beds at Berrycroft Manor.
When was Berrycroft Manor last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Berrycroft Manor was published on 2 January 2026.
Who runs Berrycroft Manor?
Berrycroft Manor is run by Finbrook Limited. It runs 2 services, all in the North West.
What is Berrycroft Manor's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 2 January 2026.

Contact

Address
32 Berrycroft Lane, Romiley, Stockport, SK6 3AU Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Silverdale (Good, 0.2 miles away) and Appleton Lodge (Good, 1.2 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    Silverdale Good, 0.2 miles away
  2. RI
    Bankfield House Care Home Requires improvement, 0.9 miles away
  3. G
    Appleton Lodge Good, 1.2 miles away
  4. G
    Appleton Manor Good, 1.2 miles away
  5. RI
    Oakwood Acquired Brain Injury Rehabilitation Service Requires improvement, 1.3 miles away

See all care homes in Stockport

See all care homes in Bredbury