Rated Care Homes

Green Lanes Projects

Care home, Haringey, 6 beds

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

Green Lanes Projects: inspection record

Care home, 6 beds, Haringey

Rated Good in July 2026.

Green Lanes Projects: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Inspected and rated 3 times since 2015. Rated Good in 2015, 2017 and July 2026.

It has been rated Good at every inspection since 2015. The latest rating was published 3 months ago.

How it compares locally

  • One of 21 Good care homes in Haringey, out of 24 with a rating.
  • About the middle for size in Haringey.

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 9 July 2026 (assessment visit 30 April 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment: 5 to 29 May 2026

The service is a residential care home providing support mainly to people with a learning disability and autistic people.

Read the full summary

People were supported safely and staff understood and managed risks effectively. The provider had a positive learning culture where people could raise concerns, and managers investigated incidents thoroughly. Facilities and equipment met people’s needs, were clean and well maintained, and any risks were mitigated. Staff were supported through training, regular supervision and appraisals. However, we identified shortfalls in the management of medicines, which placed people at risk of harm. We have asked the provider for an action plan in response to the concerns found at this assessment.

People were involved in the assessments of their needs and had enough to eat and drink to maintain good health. Staff followed best-practice guidance and worked with all agencies involved in people’s care to achieve the best outcomes. They ensured people understood their care and could give informed consent. Staff involved those important to people and made decisions in their best interests when they lacked capacity.

Staff protected people’s privacy and dignity, treated them as individuals, and supported their preferences. Staff responded promptly to people’s needs, and the provider supported staff wellbeing.

People received care tailored to their individual needs. Staff provided information in ways people could understand. People knew how to give feedback and were confident the provider would take it seriously and act on it. People received fair and equal care and support.

There was an open and inclusive culture. Leaders were visible, knowledgeable and supportive, helping staff develop in their roles. Staff felt comfortable speaking up and sharing their views, and they understood their roles and responsibilities. The service worked collaboratively with other agencies and promoted a culture of continuous improvement. However, quality assurance processes required improvement in some areas.

We assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed autistic people and people with a learning disability respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted. We found the service provided care and support in line with this guidance.

  1. Safe

    No rating

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed.

    The service was in breach of the regulation relating to safe care and treatment, particularly in relation to the management of people’s medicines.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  • Safe was rated Requires improvement on 9 July 2026. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  • Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  • Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Contact and registration details

Details for Green Lanes Projects
Address40 Myddleton Road, Wood Green, London, N22 8NR
NeighbourhoodWood Green, Haringey
Phone020 8829 0996
Registered managerTheodora Arabou
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
  • Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
  • Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder
Inspection reports 5 inspection reports, latest 7 June 2017 (opens the Care Quality Commission website) Latest assessment published 9 July 2026; CQC's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider details for Green Lanes Projects
ProviderGreen Lanes Projects Limited
Ownership typeOrganisation
Companies House number05026476 (opens Companies House)

Nearest alternatives

  1. G
    Camden Lodge Residential Care Home Care home, 0.3 miles away
    Good
  2. RI
    Sidney Avenue Lodge Residential Care Home Care home, 0.4 miles away
    Requires improvement
  3. G
    The Fer View Residential Care Home Care home, 0.6 miles away
    Good
  4. –
    Brook Water House Care home with nursing, 0.7 miles away
    Not yet rated
  5. G
    Granville Road Care home, 0.8 miles away
    Good

See all care homes in Haringey

Getting help from London Borough of Haringey

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Green Lanes Projects provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Green Lanes Projects as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Green Lanes Projects have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 6 beds at Green Lanes Projects.
When was Green Lanes Projects last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Green Lanes Projects was published on 9 July 2026.
Who runs Green Lanes Projects?
Green Lanes Projects is run by Green Lanes Projects Limited.
What is Green Lanes Projects's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 9 July 2026.