Esmere Gardens
- Care home
- 60 beds
- Nursing care
- Dementia care
- Registered since 2024
- Gloucestershire, South West
Good
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
At a glance
1 rating
Only one rating on record, so there is no trend to show yet.
9 months
since the latest rating was published.
147 of 184
rated care homes in Gloucestershire are rated Good, like this one.
Esmere Gardens: inspection record
Rated Good in January 2026.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Compare nearby
- G Edwardstow Court Care Centre Good, 3.4 miles away
- G Newlands Nursing Care Centre Good, 3.4 miles away
- – Mill House Not yet rated, 5.5 miles away
- O Low Furlong Outstanding, 6.5 miles away
- G The Langston Good, 6.5 miles away
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 21 January 2026 (assessment visit 14 October 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
Date of Assessment: 28 October to 19 November 2025. The service is a nursing home providing support to older adults who may be living with dementia or a physical disability. Esmere Gardens provides care for up to a maximum of 60 people. At the time of the assessment, 19 people were receiving care. This was a planned inspection based on information received and was the first inspection for this service.
- Safe Good
- Effective Good
- Caring Good
- Responsive Good
- Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary
Overall, we rated this service as good.
The provider had a good learning culture and people could raise concerns. Staff were confident they would be heard, and any concerns would be investigated appropriately to keep people safe.
There were sufficient staff deployed to meet people's needs. Staff were recruited safely and had effective training, support and supervision. Medicines were mostly administered safely however, some areas of improvement were noted around administering times.
People’s needs were assessed and regularly reviewed. People and those important to them were involved in decisions about their care. Staff worked with health and social care professionals to enable people to access the care and treatment they required. The service had systems to ensure people’s needs were assessed and their care planned in accordance with best practice guidance and standards.
Staff ensured people’s care and support met individual needs and preferences. Staff told us they enjoyed working at the home and knew people well. People and their relatives praised the care they received and were happy and comfortable living in the home.
Professionals supporting the service were mostly very complimentary about the service.
External professionals who worked with the service mostly gave positive feedback about the care experiences of people and the communication from staff that enabled people to receive timely support where needed.
The home was well managed. The service had a range of quality monitoring processes There was a positive open culture fostered amongst the staff team and management which aligned with the jointly created values. Staff were able to raise concerns and told us the registered manager was approachable and supportive.
However, we did identify some areas of improvement during our assessment. We did see some areas where information provision needed improvement. This related to menu choices, life history information and end of life care planning.
Professionals identified palliative care as an area needing improvement to ensure people received appropriate support.
Improvement was needed to the management and recording of decisions within mental capacity assessments. The provider was responsive to this feedback during our inspection and started to address this.
-
Safe
Good
Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.
This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated Good.This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.
-
Effective
Good
Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.
This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated Good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.
-
Caring
Good
Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.
This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated Good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.
-
Responsive
Good
Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.
This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated Good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.
-
Well-led
Good
Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.
This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated Good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.
Questions to ask when you visit
- Ask how nursing cover works at night and at weekends.
- Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
- Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.
Registration details
- Registered manager
- Kimberly Mae Pascual
- Registered with the CQC since
- What it provides
- Care home service with nursing
- Who it supports
- Dementia, Older People, Physical Disability
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
- Provider
- Shipston House Ltd
- Ownership type
- Organisation
- Companies House number
- 10483894 (opens Companies House)
Shipston House Ltd runs 2 services in England, 1 of them in the South West. 2 are rated Good or Outstanding.
Other services run by Shipston House Ltd
- G Shipston Lodge Good. Care home with nursing, Warwickshire, West Midlands
Getting help from Gloucestershire County Council
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at Gloucestershire County Council
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 01452 426 868, Monday to Friday, 8am to 5pm
- Contact adult social care online
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: Gloucestershire County Council
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does Esmere Gardens provide nursing care?
- Yes. The Care Quality Commission lists Esmere Gardens as a care home with nursing.
- How many beds does Esmere Gardens have?
- The Care Quality Commission's register lists 60 beds at Esmere Gardens.
- When was Esmere Gardens last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Esmere Gardens was published on 21 January 2026.
- Who runs Esmere Gardens?
- Esmere Gardens is run by Shipston House Ltd. It runs 2 services in England, 1 of them in the South West.
- What is Esmere Gardens's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 21 January 2026.
Contact
- Phone
- 01608 692222
- Address
- Stow Road, Moreton-in-marsh, GL56 0DS Map (opens Google Maps)
Compare nearby
- G Edwardstow Court Care Centre Good, 3.4 miles away
- G Newlands Nursing Care Centre Good, 3.4 miles away
- – Mill House Not yet rated, 5.5 miles away
- O Low Furlong Outstanding, 6.5 miles away
- G The Langston Good, 6.5 miles away