Rated Care Homes

Fern Hill House Care Home

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 6 ratings

    Its last inspection improved it from Inadequate to Requires improvement.

  • 6 years

    since the latest rating was published. A rating this old may not show how the service is today.

  • 61 of 381

    rated care homes in Lancashire are rated Requires improvement, like this one.

Fern Hill House Care Home: inspection record

Care home, 24 beds, Lancashire

Rated Requires improvement in April 2021, up from Inadequate.

Fern Hill House Care Home: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: The Laurels Care and Nursing Home (Good, 0.3 miles away) and Hollybank House (Good, 1.3 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    The Laurels Care and Nursing Home Good, 0.3 miles away
  2. RI
    Olive House Home for Older People Requires improvement, 0.7 miles away
  3. G
    Hollybank House Good, 1.3 miles away
  4. G
    Freehold Cottage Residential Home Good, 1.8 miles away
  5. G
    Woodleigh House Good, 2.2 miles away

See all care homes in Lancashire

See all care homes in Bacup

About the service

From the Care Quality Commission's inspection report published 9 April 2021. Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Fern Hill House Care Home is a residential care home providing accommodation, care and support for up to 24 people aged 65; some people using the service were living with dementia. Accommodation is provided over three floors. During our inspection the top floor was not in use. There were 17 people living in the home.

What inspectors found

Since the last inspection, there had been improvements made but time was needed to embed new systems to ensure they were effective and could be sustained. The provider had addressed the serious concerns raised in the fire safety enforcement notice. However, additional work needed to be completed and signed off by the fire safety officer. Quality monitoring systems had improved with evidence shortfalls had been identified and acted on. However, further improvements were needed in areas such as developing action plans and ensuring care records, equipment servicing and medicines management audits were fully effective.

Read the rest of CQC's summary

The management of risks to people's health, safety and wellbeing had improved. However, we found areas that could be improved further to ensure staff were provided with guidance about how to provide care in a safe way. Accident and incident management had improved, and lessons were learnt from any incidents. Staff had been provided with the provider's mandatory safety training. Training and supervision sessions were used to ensure learning and improvements took place. The manager and staff were clear about when to report incidents and safeguarding concerns to other agencies. Relatives had no concerns about the safety of their family members. We observed good interactions between staff and people.

People's medicines were managed and stored safely, and records were clear. However, improvements were needed in relation to recording the application of creams, medicines for disposal and keeping records of medicines ordered. We were assured the provider was preventing visitors from catching and spreading infections and there had been no COVID-19 outbreaks in the home. The service was clean and odour free. During the inspection, the cleaning schedules were reviewed to ensure staff were following safe guidance.

Staff were recruited safely, and records showed there were consistent numbers of staff available to meet people's needs. Relatives made positive comments about the care and support provided by staff particularly during the pandemic. New care planning records reflected people's choices and considered people's diverse needs. People looked settled and happy and we observed them being treated with care and respect. People's views and opinions were sought through day to day discussions and surveys; resident meetings were due to recommence. Relatives confirmed they had been kept up to date and involved in any changes and decisions.

The manager and provider understood their responsibility to be open and honest when something went wrong. Staff said the manager was approachable. The manager and staff worked in partnership with a range of professionals to ensure people received the care and support they needed. The manager was supported

by the management team and had enrolled on training to support him with the role. Staff told us they were supported and enjoyed working at the service. Staff and relatives made positive comments about the manager's contribution to improvement and ongoing communication.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 9 April 2021. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 9 April 2021. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
  3. The last rating is 6 years old. Ask what has changed since then.

Registration details

Registered manager
Terence Magraw
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Mental Health, Older People, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

6 inspection reports, latest 9 April 2021. The reports are on the Care Quality Commission website.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
09311072 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Lancashire County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Fern Hill House Care Home provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Fern Hill House Care Home as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Fern Hill House Care Home have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 24 beds at Fern Hill House Care Home.
When was Fern Hill House Care Home last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Fern Hill House Care Home was published on 9 April 2021.
Who runs Fern Hill House Care Home?
Fern Hill House Care Home is run by Burwood Care Home Limited.
What is Fern Hill House Care Home's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 9 April 2021.

Contact

Phone
01706 873466
Address
2-8 Todmorden Road, Bacup, OL13 9BA Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: The Laurels Care and Nursing Home (Good, 0.3 miles away) and Hollybank House (Good, 1.3 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    The Laurels Care and Nursing Home Good, 0.3 miles away
  2. RI
    Olive House Home for Older People Requires improvement, 0.7 miles away
  3. G
    Hollybank House Good, 1.3 miles away
  4. G
    Freehold Cottage Residential Home Good, 1.8 miles away
  5. G
    Woodleigh House Good, 2.2 miles away

See all care homes in Lancashire

See all care homes in Bacup