Rated Care Homes

Oakley Grange

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 1 rating

    Only one rating on record, so there is no trend to show yet.

  • 3 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 120 of 153

    rated care homes in Warwickshire are rated Good, like this one.

Oakley Grange: inspection record

Care home, 76 beds, Warwickshire

Rated Good in July 2026.

Oakley Grange: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Cherry Tree Lodge Good, 1 mile away
  2. G
    Jubilee House Care Home Good, 1 mile away
  3. G
    Clarendon Manor Good, 1.4 miles away
  4. G
    Royal Leamington Spa Nursing Home Good, 1.5 miles away
  5. RI
    Thistley Lodge Requires improvement, 1.6 miles away

See all care homes in Warwickshire

See all care homes in Whitnash

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 13 July 2026 (assessment visit 1 April 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

This inspection was carried out between 23 June and 2 July 2026. Oakley Grange is a residential care home for up to 76 people, including older people and people living with dementia. At the time of our inspection there were 34 people living in the home. This was the first inspection of this service, and we reviewed all 5 key questions.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

As part of our inspection, we spoke with people who used the service, their relatives, staff, the registered manager and the provider’s care and quality managers. We reviewed care plans, medication records, recruitment files and quality assurance records.

Oakley Grange presented a welcoming environment which was clean and well-maintained. Staffing levels enabled staff to provide safe care which was responsive to people’s individual needs. Staff received a structured induction when they started working at the home and regular refresher training to ensure their practice reflected current guidance and standards. Staff understood their responsibility to protect people from potential harm, abuse or poor practice and monitored people to identify any deterioration in their health. Effective communication ensured any changes in people’s needs were communicated between teams and shared with other healthcare professionals when people transitioned between services.

Pre-admission assessments involved people and their relatives and explored people’s personal identities, cultural requirements, religious needs and communication preferences. Where people had risks associated with their health or medical conditions, these were identified and planned for. A weekly ward round with the local GP practice meant people had consistent oversight of their health and medication. Safe medicines practice ensured people received their medicines as prescribed.

The provider and registered manager were committed to ensuring everyone in the home had the same access to opportunities and experiences. Assessments and care plans considered any factors that could increase the risk of people being disadvantaged because their needs were not being recognised or met. Staff promoted person centred care by respecting people’s preferences and routines and encouraging their independence.

The provider had a framework of checks and audits to ensure standards were maintained, regulations were met and which supported accountability across the service. There were policies to promote equality and inclusion, and staff felt confident to share their feedback about the service. The provider had established strong and meaningful partnerships with other organisations and health professionals to benefit people living in the home as well as the wider community.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    This is the first inspection for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    This is the first inspection for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    This is the first inspection for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    This is the first inspection for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    This is the first inspection for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  2. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Pam Casey
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
13231893 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Warwickshire County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Oakley Grange provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Oakley Grange as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Oakley Grange have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 76 beds at Oakley Grange.
When was Oakley Grange last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Oakley Grange was published on 13 July 2026.
Who runs Oakley Grange?
Oakley Grange is run by Warwick Care Services Limited.
What is Oakley Grange's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 13 July 2026.

Contact

Phone
01926 351165
Address
Cox Gardens, Warwick, CV34 7AT Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Cherry Tree Lodge Good, 1 mile away
  2. G
    Jubilee House Care Home Good, 1 mile away
  3. G
    Clarendon Manor Good, 1.4 miles away
  4. G
    Royal Leamington Spa Nursing Home Good, 1.5 miles away
  5. RI
    Thistley Lodge Requires improvement, 1.6 miles away

See all care homes in Warwickshire

See all care homes in Whitnash