Rated Care Homes

Cranleigh Gardens

Care home, Sutton, 5 beds

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

Cranleigh Gardens: inspection record

Care home, 5 beds, Sutton

Rated Good in March 2023.

Cranleigh Gardens: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Inspected and rated 2 times since 2017. Rated Good in 2017 and March 2023.

It has been rated Good at every inspection since 2017. The latest rating was published about 4 years ago.

How it compares locally

  • One of 58 Good care homes in Sutton, out of 63 with a rating.
  • Smaller than 9 in 10 care homes in Sutton.

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's inspection report published 29 March 2023. Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Cranleigh Gardens was well led. The provider's ethos and values put people at the heart of the service. This vision was driven by the leadership of the nominated individual and of the registered manager. The staff team were empowered to contribute fully to support a person-centred model of effective care. This helped people using the service, with complex needs, to achieve their hopes and aspirations for more independent living.

People, their relatives and professionals all praised the managers and the staff team and gave examples of the care that was delivered.

Read the full summary

People received personalised care and support according to their needs and wishes. This was particularly effective in supporting people to achieve their goals and outcomes as it also helped people to be more confident in developing the skills they needed to achieve more independent living.

The provider created the right culture where their staff could develop and provided the right training and support to make sure they could fulfil their roles appropriately.

The service was flexible and adapted to people's changing needs and wishes and promoted their independence. Care was person centred and risk assessments were in place. Risk management plans helped staff as well as the person to minimise risks and included positive risk taking.

People's diversity and their unique individual needs were well-respected by staff. The staff team knew people extremely well and were able to provide appropriate support discreetly and with compassion.

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service were all focused on achieving these outcomes.

People were encouraged and supported to lead as fulfilled a life as possible. They were supported to follow their hopes and aspirations.

There was clear evidence of collaborative working and excellent communication with other professionals in health and social care as well as in the community and education sectors. The provider used innovative

ways to build excellent relationships with the community and with health and social care professionals so that people using the service would benefit.

Staffing levels were good and appropriate to ensure people's needs were met in a safe, timely and consistent way.

Staff were supported and encouraged to continue their professional development in order to progress and provide the best outcomes for people.

People were kept safe. Staff demonstrated they knew how to raise safeguarding concerns and were aware of the processes to follow in order to keep people safe.

People told us they were kept safe and that they felt safe.

Care and support plans were developed to ensure people's needs and risks were met appropriately. People were assisted to work towards achieving their maximum potential in terms of their independence. Risk management strategies were in place to assist staff to help people to manage these risks and to identify triggers for behaviours that may challenge.

The administration of medicines was managed in a safe way. There were policies and procedures in place for staff to follow and staff told us they found them useful in ensuring people received their medicines safely.

The service was following safe infection prevention and control procedures to keep people safe.

People were assisted to become more independent with their menu planning and budgeting to enable them to eat more healthily and within their budgets. They were helped with developing their meal preparation skills.

People's health care needs were being met and they had access to healthcare services where needed.

Staff were kind and caring, they respected and valued people using the service.

People's privacy was respected, and people were supported to maintain contact with relatives and friends.

There was a comprehensive and effective governance system in place. People, relatives and staff were confident about approaching the registered manager if they needed to. They recognised that their views and feedback were valued and respected and consistently used to support quality service development. A wide range of comprehensive audits took place to ensure the quality of the service was maintained.

Robust processes were in place to manage and respond to complaints and concerns.

Questions to ask when you visit

  • The last rating is 4 years old. Ask what has changed since then.
  • Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  • Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Contact and registration details

Details for Cranleigh Gardens
Address1 Cranleigh Gardens, Sutton, SM1 3EJ
NeighbourhoodSutton town, Sutton
Phone020 8661 7238
Registered managerEileen Simpson
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
  • Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
  • Mental Health
  • Older People
  • Younger Adults
Inspection reports 3 inspection reports, latest 29 March 2023 (opens the Care Quality Commission website) The reports are on the Care Quality Commission website.

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider details for Cranleigh Gardens
ProviderCurado Ltd
Ownership typeOrganisation
Companies House number07489821 (opens Companies House)

Curado Ltd runs 2 services in London. 2 are rated Good or Outstanding.

Other services run by Curado Ltd

  1. G
    Lona Lodge Care home, Sutton
    Good

Nearest alternatives

  1. G
    Orchard House Nursing Home Care home with nursing, 0.2 miles away
    Good
  2. G
    3 The Green Care home, 0.3 miles away
    Good
  3. G
    Rutland House Care Home Care home, 0.4 miles away
    Good
  4. G
    Grennell Lodge Nursing Care Home Care home with nursing, 0.5 miles away
    Good
  5. G
    Lona Lodge Care home, 0.6 miles away
    Good

See all care homes in Sutton

Getting help from London Borough of Sutton

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Cranleigh Gardens provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Cranleigh Gardens as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Cranleigh Gardens have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 5 beds at Cranleigh Gardens.
When was Cranleigh Gardens last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Cranleigh Gardens was published on 29 March 2023.
Who runs Cranleigh Gardens?
Cranleigh Gardens is run by Curado Ltd. It runs 2 services in London.
What is Cranleigh Gardens's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 29 March 2023.